UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how is it a smear when you used the exact same euphemism for your alternate reality?
Mark Blyth, the economist who's making sense
- Thread starter ttystikk
- Start date
- Status
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/08/04/dawn-of-the-dead-why-american-politics-cant-be-reformed/
Astute readers may detect a pattern...
Astute readers may detect a pattern...
Skip to content
patribotics
BY PATRIBOTICS POSTED ON MAY 29, 2017
Donald Trump Sealed Indictment Started With Eric Schneiderman
We have New York State Attorney Eric Schneiderman to thank for the genesis of the sealed indictment against Donald Trump currently being held in the Eastern District of Virginia, which has formed the basis of the case of impeachment already begun against him. This is how that happened:
AG Schneiderman began a case of Enterprise Corruption, the state name for RICO, against Donald Trump. The case was based on the activities of Russian mobsters like Semion Moglievich who lived in Trump Tower, Russian oligarchs, and others.
Upon his own judgement and belief, Scheiderman decided that his case touched both Federal issues, and issues of National Security. He took his case to the Federal authorities. While the appropriate Federal District can often be location-based, if a federal case is to start on the same factual basis, the court chosen can also be based on subject matter. Because National Security is involved, Schneiderman brought his case to FISC to be heard.
FISC does not empanel Grand Juries. Per procedure, Schneiderman dismissed his case, which as a state AG he can do without a judge’s ruling; he had the right to dispose of it. The case was then restarted Federal Court on the facts offered by Schneiderman, as a RICO case. FISC provided evidence under seal to a Grand Jury, drawn from the Eastern District of Virginia, who read the evidence in a SCIF, a secure facility in the building sealed away from the public.
Sources report FISC retained some jurisdiction over this case, although jurors were empaneled from EDVA. Separate sources report this: it was unclear to me if the FISC power over the case was solely related to sealing the matter, or if perhaps there was more evidence heard at FISC than was shared with the Grand Jury. But that ‘some jurisdiction’ was retained was told me by several sources.
Editor’s Note: Donations and Whistleblowing
Patribotics hopes to expand reporting and commission other writers. If you would like to donate, there are buttons around the site, or you could make a contribution here. If whistleblowers wish to contact patribotics they are encouraged to get in touch on Twitter, or via the secure email listed here.
Earlier this month, Claude Taylor and I reported exclusively that the indictment was granted. We were pulled up on use of the term “granted”, but it is the correct term when, as in this case, no prosecution is yet possible, since a sitting President has immunity; but he can be indicted, and he has been.
We reported as fact that the case was intended by prosecutors to form the basis of impeachment. This too was absolutely correct. Following the granting of the indictment on Trump, DAG Rosenstein took the matter to the Senate and presented it to lawmakers including Lindsey Graham in closed session. That is why Senator Graham came out and said ‘this investigation is now very clearly a criminal one.’ He had to say that; there was an existing criminal indictment and he had been shown it.
The following day, Rep. Green called for impeachment on the floor of the House. Contrary to what some ignoramuses are pushing on social media, a case of impeachment was begun against Trump at that moment:
Impeachment proceedings may be commenced in the House of Representatives by a Member declaring a charge of impeachment on his or her own initiative
Per procedure in the case of impeachment of individuals, the matter then went to the House Judiciary Committee.
Trump was then notified by both the other branches that a case of impeachment was commenced against him. I can report as fact that the Sergeant At Arms of the Senate, Frank Larkin (correction sorry needed tea), went to the White House on that Wednesday night. We did not report that the Marshal of the SCOTUS did so – only that she spoke to him before he left the country, on the matter of preserving evidence and complying with the orders of the courts. Sources linked to the enforcement arm of the judicial branch report Donald Trump was also told that he had not followed procedure to declassify evidence to the Russians; and that it would constitute an offense were he to share intelligence without declassifying it in the legal way on this trip. These sources do not report the location of that warning nor who delivered it to Trump, but it happened after the case of impeachment was begun and prior to his departure on Air Force One.
Sources report that AG Schneiderman, whose evidence was used to form the basis of a criminal indictment of the President, has been placed under an even heavier armed guard than usual for his protection.
patribotics
BY PATRIBOTICS POSTED ON MAY 29, 2017
Donald Trump Sealed Indictment Started With Eric Schneiderman
We have New York State Attorney Eric Schneiderman to thank for the genesis of the sealed indictment against Donald Trump currently being held in the Eastern District of Virginia, which has formed the basis of the case of impeachment already begun against him. This is how that happened:
AG Schneiderman began a case of Enterprise Corruption, the state name for RICO, against Donald Trump. The case was based on the activities of Russian mobsters like Semion Moglievich who lived in Trump Tower, Russian oligarchs, and others.
Upon his own judgement and belief, Scheiderman decided that his case touched both Federal issues, and issues of National Security. He took his case to the Federal authorities. While the appropriate Federal District can often be location-based, if a federal case is to start on the same factual basis, the court chosen can also be based on subject matter. Because National Security is involved, Schneiderman brought his case to FISC to be heard.
FISC does not empanel Grand Juries. Per procedure, Schneiderman dismissed his case, which as a state AG he can do without a judge’s ruling; he had the right to dispose of it. The case was then restarted Federal Court on the facts offered by Schneiderman, as a RICO case. FISC provided evidence under seal to a Grand Jury, drawn from the Eastern District of Virginia, who read the evidence in a SCIF, a secure facility in the building sealed away from the public.
Sources report FISC retained some jurisdiction over this case, although jurors were empaneled from EDVA. Separate sources report this: it was unclear to me if the FISC power over the case was solely related to sealing the matter, or if perhaps there was more evidence heard at FISC than was shared with the Grand Jury. But that ‘some jurisdiction’ was retained was told me by several sources.
Editor’s Note: Donations and Whistleblowing
Patribotics hopes to expand reporting and commission other writers. If you would like to donate, there are buttons around the site, or you could make a contribution here. If whistleblowers wish to contact patribotics they are encouraged to get in touch on Twitter, or via the secure email listed here.
Earlier this month, Claude Taylor and I reported exclusively that the indictment was granted. We were pulled up on use of the term “granted”, but it is the correct term when, as in this case, no prosecution is yet possible, since a sitting President has immunity; but he can be indicted, and he has been.
We reported as fact that the case was intended by prosecutors to form the basis of impeachment. This too was absolutely correct. Following the granting of the indictment on Trump, DAG Rosenstein took the matter to the Senate and presented it to lawmakers including Lindsey Graham in closed session. That is why Senator Graham came out and said ‘this investigation is now very clearly a criminal one.’ He had to say that; there was an existing criminal indictment and he had been shown it.
The following day, Rep. Green called for impeachment on the floor of the House. Contrary to what some ignoramuses are pushing on social media, a case of impeachment was begun against Trump at that moment:
Impeachment proceedings may be commenced in the House of Representatives by a Member declaring a charge of impeachment on his or her own initiative
Per procedure in the case of impeachment of individuals, the matter then went to the House Judiciary Committee.
Trump was then notified by both the other branches that a case of impeachment was commenced against him. I can report as fact that the Sergeant At Arms of the Senate, Frank Larkin (correction sorry needed tea), went to the White House on that Wednesday night. We did not report that the Marshal of the SCOTUS did so – only that she spoke to him before he left the country, on the matter of preserving evidence and complying with the orders of the courts. Sources linked to the enforcement arm of the judicial branch report Donald Trump was also told that he had not followed procedure to declassify evidence to the Russians; and that it would constitute an offense were he to share intelligence without declassifying it in the legal way on this trip. These sources do not report the location of that warning nor who delivered it to Trump, but it happened after the case of impeachment was begun and prior to his departure on Air Force One.
Sources report that AG Schneiderman, whose evidence was used to form the basis of a criminal indictment of the President, has been placed under an even heavier armed guard than usual for his protection.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
yawnSkip to content
patribotics
BY PATRIBOTICS POSTED ON MAY 29, 2017
Donald Trump Sealed Indictment Started With Eric Schneiderman
We have New York State Attorney Eric Schneiderman to thank for the genesis of the sealed indictment against Donald Trump currently being held in the Eastern District of Virginia, which has formed the basis of the case of impeachment already begun against him. This is how that happened:
AG Schneiderman began a case of Enterprise Corruption, the state name for RICO, against Donald Trump. The case was based on the activities of Russian mobsters like Semion Moglievich who lived in Trump Tower, Russian oligarchs, and others.
Upon his own judgement and belief, Scheiderman decided that his case touched both Federal issues, and issues of National Security. He took his case to the Federal authorities. While the appropriate Federal District can often be location-based, if a federal case is to start on the same factual basis, the court chosen can also be based on subject matter. Because National Security is involved, Schneiderman brought his case to FISC to be heard.
FISC does not empanel Grand Juries. Per procedure, Schneiderman dismissed his case, which as a state AG he can do without a judge’s ruling; he had the right to dispose of it. The case was then restarted Federal Court on the facts offered by Schneiderman, as a RICO case. FISC provided evidence under seal to a Grand Jury, drawn from the Eastern District of Virginia, who read the evidence in a SCIF, a secure facility in the building sealed away from the public.
Sources report FISC retained some jurisdiction over this case, although jurors were empaneled from EDVA. Separate sources report this: it was unclear to me if the FISC power over the case was solely related to sealing the matter, or if perhaps there was more evidence heard at FISC than was shared with the Grand Jury. But that ‘some jurisdiction’ was retained was told me by several sources.
Editor’s Note: Donations and Whistleblowing
Patribotics hopes to expand reporting and commission other writers. If you would like to donate, there are buttons around the site, or you could make a contribution here. If whistleblowers wish to contact patribotics they are encouraged to get in touch on Twitter, or via the secure email listed here.
Earlier this month, Claude Taylor and I reported exclusively that the indictment was granted. We were pulled up on use of the term “granted”, but it is the correct term when, as in this case, no prosecution is yet possible, since a sitting President has immunity; but he can be indicted, and he has been.
We reported as fact that the case was intended by prosecutors to form the basis of impeachment. This too was absolutely correct. Following the granting of the indictment on Trump, DAG Rosenstein took the matter to the Senate and presented it to lawmakers including Lindsey Graham in closed session. That is why Senator Graham came out and said ‘this investigation is now very clearly a criminal one.’ He had to say that; there was an existing criminal indictment and he had been shown it.
The following day, Rep. Green called for impeachment on the floor of the House. Contrary to what some ignoramuses are pushing on social media, a case of impeachment was begun against Trump at that moment:
Impeachment proceedings may be commenced in the House of Representatives by a Member declaring a charge of impeachment on his or her own initiative
Per procedure in the case of impeachment of individuals, the matter then went to the House Judiciary Committee.
Trump was then notified by both the other branches that a case of impeachment was commenced against him. I can report as fact that the Sergeant At Arms of the Senate, Frank Larkin (correction sorry needed tea), went to the White House on that Wednesday night. We did not report that the Marshal of the SCOTUS did so – only that she spoke to him before he left the country, on the matter of preserving evidence and complying with the orders of the courts. Sources linked to the enforcement arm of the judicial branch report Donald Trump was also told that he had not followed procedure to declassify evidence to the Russians; and that it would constitute an offense were he to share intelligence without declassifying it in the legal way on this trip. These sources do not report the location of that warning nor who delivered it to Trump, but it happened after the case of impeachment was begun and prior to his departure on Air Force One.
Sources report that AG Schneiderman, whose evidence was used to form the basis of a criminal indictment of the President, has been placed under an even heavier armed guard than usual for his protection.
Last edited:
travisw
Well-Known Member
It's funny you say that, because I've noticed a pattern.
I wonder if other "astute" members see it too.
Why Israel Needs Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/22/why-israel-needs-anti-semitism/
Anti-Israel and the Myth of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/03/anti-israel-and-the-myth-of-anti-semitism/
On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/12/82580/
The Fallacy of Rising Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/20/the-fallacy-of-rising-anti-semitism/
The New Anti-Semitism: the Case of Joy Karega
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/26/the-new-anti-semitism-the-case-of-joy-karega/
Here's an interesting article. Another publication apologized for using them as a source.
"What I did not realize was that Counterpunch has engaged in a consistent pattern of anti-semitism, all of which has been well-documented."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/5/4/1206902/-An-Apology-for-the-Counterpunch-Diary
Guardian Praises Anti-Semitic Site “CounterPunch” as Progressive
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/07/25/guardian-praises-anti-semitic-site-counterpunch-as-progressive/
Counterpunch has repeatedly run articles by prolific anti-Semite, Gilad Atzmon. Briefly, Atzmon has questioned whether the Holocaust occurred, while simultaneously arguing that, if Hitler’s genocide did occur, it can partly be explained by Jews’ villainous behavior. Atzmon also explicitly charged that Jews are indeed trying to take over the world, and has endorsed the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, arguing about the document that “it is impossible to ignore its prophetic qualities and its capacity to describe” later Jewish behavior.
The Most Common Mistakes of Israelis https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/08/28/the-most-common-mistakes-of-israelis/
Counterpunch published an article by Alison Weir which alleges that the blood libel, (the charge that Jews ritually murdered gentiles), is true and is related to the false reports, in 2009, regarding Israeli thefts of human organs from Palestinians.
CounterPunch has made a cause celebre of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel.http://hurryupharry.org/2005/02/27/counterpunch/
CounterPunch’s Alexander Cockburn has advanced the argument that Jews have a stranglehold on the U.S. media.https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/03/12/when-billy-graham-planned-to-kill-one-million-people/
CounterPunch has published bizarre conspiracy theories, such as one piece written by Paul Craig Roberts about the Iranian protests in 2009, with the title “Are the Iranian protests another American orchestrated ‘Color Revolution‘?”
https://www.counterpunch.org/2009/06/19/are-the-iranian-protests-another-us-orchestrated-quot-color-revolution-quot/
CounterPunch‘s Alexander Cockburn has cheered on mass-murderingIslamist terrorists in Iraq.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/07/14/support-their-troops/
CounterPunch has advanced dual loyalty canards about Jews, and xenophobic narratives about how Washington is “occupied” by Israel
https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/05/09/israel-and-congress/
Counterpunch also has often welcomed Eric Walburg, a neo Nazi, to publish at their site. Walburg is also a Holocaust denier who, on the pages of CounterPunch, engaged in pro-Taliban propaganda.
http://hurryupharry.org/2011/08/05/atzmon-and-walberg-two-nazis-discuss-marxism/
CounterPunch published a rant by Jennifer Loewenstein, about a “Gazan Holocaust”, which included a passage referring to Israelis as “Neo-Jewish Masters” who used the Gaza war as a “pretext to carry out mass murder of the Arab Untermenschen.”
CounterPunch published the fascist Holocaust denier, and blood libel promoter, ‘Israel Shamir‘.
https://www.thejc.com/news/world/antisemitic-holocaust-denier-in-charge-of-wikileaks-russian-distribution-1.20035
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
This reader, whether astute or not is up to others to decide, see's tty following the pattern of other old unattached white male geezers who are hooked on fake conspiracy stories and uses them to excuse their failures. Yes, his antisemitism is getting to be starkly noticeable. If we would just stop talking about it, the problem would be solved.It's funny you say that, because I've noticed a pattern.
I wonder if other "astute" members see it too.
Why Israel Needs Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/22/why-israel-needs-anti-semitism/
Anti-Israel and the Myth of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/03/anti-israel-and-the-myth-of-anti-semitism/
On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/12/82580/
The Fallacy of Rising Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/20/the-fallacy-of-rising-anti-semitism/
The New Anti-Semitism: the Case of Joy Karega
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/26/the-new-anti-semitism-the-case-of-joy-karega/
Here's an interesting article. Another publication apologized for using them as a source.
"What I did not realize was that Counterpunch has engaged in a consistent pattern of anti-semitism, all of which has been well-documented."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/5/4/1206902/-An-Apology-for-the-Counterpunch-Diary
Guardian Praises Anti-Semitic Site “CounterPunch” as Progressive
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/07/25/guardian-praises-anti-semitic-site-counterpunch-as-progressive/
Counterpunch has repeatedly run articles by prolific anti-Semite, Gilad Atzmon. Briefly, Atzmon has questioned whether the Holocaust occurred, while simultaneously arguing that, if Hitler’s genocide did occur, it can partly be explained by Jews’ villainous behavior. Atzmon also explicitly charged that Jews are indeed trying to take over the world, and has endorsed the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, arguing about the document that “it is impossible to ignore its prophetic qualities and its capacity to describe” later Jewish behavior.
The Most Common Mistakes of Israelis https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/08/28/the-most-common-mistakes-of-israelis/
Counterpunch published an article by Alison Weir which alleges that the blood libel, (the charge that Jews ritually murdered gentiles), is true and is related to the false reports, in 2009, regarding Israeli thefts of human organs from Palestinians.
CounterPunch has made a cause celebre of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel.http://hurryupharry.org/2005/02/27/counterpunch/
CounterPunch’s Alexander Cockburn has advanced the argument that Jews have a stranglehold on the U.S. media.https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/03/12/when-billy-graham-planned-to-kill-one-million-people/
CounterPunch has published bizarre conspiracy theories, such as one piece written by Paul Craig Roberts about the Iranian protests in 2009, with the title “Are the Iranian protests another American orchestrated ‘Color Revolution‘?”
https://www.counterpunch.org/2009/06/19/are-the-iranian-protests-another-us-orchestrated-quot-color-revolution-quot/
CounterPunch‘s Alexander Cockburn has cheered on mass-murderingIslamist terrorists in Iraq.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/07/14/support-their-troops/
CounterPunch has advanced dual loyalty canards about Jews, and xenophobic narratives about how Washington is “occupied” by Israel
https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/05/09/israel-and-congress/
Counterpunch also has often welcomed Eric Walburg, a neo Nazi, to publish at their site. Walburg is also a Holocaust denier who, on the pages of CounterPunch, engaged in pro-Taliban propaganda.
http://hurryupharry.org/2011/08/05/atzmon-and-walberg-two-nazis-discuss-marxism/
CounterPunch published a rant by Jennifer Loewenstein, about a “Gazan Holocaust”, which included a passage referring to Israelis as “Neo-Jewish Masters” who used the Gaza war as a “pretext to carry out mass murder of the Arab Untermenschen.”
CounterPunch published the fascist Holocaust denier, and blood libel promoter, ‘Israel Shamir‘.
https://www.thejc.com/news/world/antisemitic-holocaust-denier-in-charge-of-wikileaks-russian-distribution-1.20035
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I know you can't understand this, but I'm a peace loving and kind person.
you can't belittle or make me angry..but you CAN look the fool.
<@fauxdog clicks open his meme generator>
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Except that I did not reference any of those articles.It's funny you say that, because I've noticed a pattern.
I wonder if other "astute" members see it too.
Why Israel Needs Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/22/why-israel-needs-anti-semitism/
Anti-Israel and the Myth of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/03/anti-israel-and-the-myth-of-anti-semitism/
On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/12/82580/
The Fallacy of Rising Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/20/the-fallacy-of-rising-anti-semitism/
The New Anti-Semitism: the Case of Joy Karega
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/26/the-new-anti-semitism-the-case-of-joy-karega/
Here's an interesting article. Another publication apologized for using them as a source.
"What I did not realize was that Counterpunch has engaged in a consistent pattern of anti-semitism, all of which has been well-documented."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/5/4/1206902/-An-Apology-for-the-Counterpunch-Diary
Guardian Praises Anti-Semitic Site “CounterPunch” as Progressive
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/07/25/guardian-praises-anti-semitic-site-counterpunch-as-progressive/
Counterpunch has repeatedly run articles by prolific anti-Semite, Gilad Atzmon. Briefly, Atzmon has questioned whether the Holocaust occurred, while simultaneously arguing that, if Hitler’s genocide did occur, it can partly be explained by Jews’ villainous behavior. Atzmon also explicitly charged that Jews are indeed trying to take over the world, and has endorsed the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, arguing about the document that “it is impossible to ignore its prophetic qualities and its capacity to describe” later Jewish behavior.
The Most Common Mistakes of Israelis https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/08/28/the-most-common-mistakes-of-israelis/
Counterpunch published an article by Alison Weir which alleges that the blood libel, (the charge that Jews ritually murdered gentiles), is true and is related to the false reports, in 2009, regarding Israeli thefts of human organs from Palestinians.
CounterPunch has made a cause celebre of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel.http://hurryupharry.org/2005/02/27/counterpunch/
CounterPunch’s Alexander Cockburn has advanced the argument that Jews have a stranglehold on the U.S. media.https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/03/12/when-billy-graham-planned-to-kill-one-million-people/
CounterPunch has published bizarre conspiracy theories, such as one piece written by Paul Craig Roberts about the Iranian protests in 2009, with the title “Are the Iranian protests another American orchestrated ‘Color Revolution‘?”
https://www.counterpunch.org/2009/06/19/are-the-iranian-protests-another-us-orchestrated-quot-color-revolution-quot/
CounterPunch‘s Alexander Cockburn has cheered on mass-murderingIslamist terrorists in Iraq.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/07/14/support-their-troops/
CounterPunch has advanced dual loyalty canards about Jews, and xenophobic narratives about how Washington is “occupied” by Israel
https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/05/09/israel-and-congress/
Counterpunch also has often welcomed Eric Walburg, a neo Nazi, to publish at their site. Walburg is also a Holocaust denier who, on the pages of CounterPunch, engaged in pro-Taliban propaganda.
http://hurryupharry.org/2011/08/05/atzmon-and-walberg-two-nazis-discuss-marxism/
CounterPunch published a rant by Jennifer Loewenstein, about a “Gazan Holocaust”, which included a passage referring to Israelis as “Neo-Jewish Masters” who used the Gaza war as a “pretext to carry out mass murder of the Arab Untermenschen.”
CounterPunch published the fascist Holocaust denier, and blood libel promoter, ‘Israel Shamir‘.
https://www.thejc.com/news/world/antisemitic-holocaust-denier-in-charge-of-wikileaks-russian-distribution-1.20035
Are you saying that any mention of Palestinian mistreatment is by definition anti-Semitic?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
And a personal attack in place of any argument whatsoever.
I do hope you don't have any firearms.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Honestly though, when everyone says you're wrong continuiously do you not have the self actualization to question your beliefs?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Yeah that is definitely an antisemitic propaganda rag. I think it would be obvious to anyone that citing such a source is a clear indication of the sort of thing one wants to be exposed to and spread.It's funny you say that, because I've noticed a pattern.
I wonder if other "astute" members see it too.
Why Israel Needs Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/07/22/why-israel-needs-anti-semitism/
Anti-Israel and the Myth of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/03/anti-israel-and-the-myth-of-anti-semitism/
On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/12/82580/
The Fallacy of Rising Anti-Semitism
https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/20/the-fallacy-of-rising-anti-semitism/
The New Anti-Semitism: the Case of Joy Karega
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/08/26/the-new-anti-semitism-the-case-of-joy-karega/
Here's an interesting article. Another publication apologized for using them as a source.
"What I did not realize was that Counterpunch has engaged in a consistent pattern of anti-semitism, all of which has been well-documented."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/5/4/1206902/-An-Apology-for-the-Counterpunch-Diary
Guardian Praises Anti-Semitic Site “CounterPunch” as Progressive
http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/07/25/guardian-praises-anti-semitic-site-counterpunch-as-progressive/
Counterpunch has repeatedly run articles by prolific anti-Semite, Gilad Atzmon. Briefly, Atzmon has questioned whether the Holocaust occurred, while simultaneously arguing that, if Hitler’s genocide did occur, it can partly be explained by Jews’ villainous behavior. Atzmon also explicitly charged that Jews are indeed trying to take over the world, and has endorsed the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, arguing about the document that “it is impossible to ignore its prophetic qualities and its capacity to describe” later Jewish behavior.
The Most Common Mistakes of Israelis https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/08/28/the-most-common-mistakes-of-israelis/
Counterpunch published an article by Alison Weir which alleges that the blood libel, (the charge that Jews ritually murdered gentiles), is true and is related to the false reports, in 2009, regarding Israeli thefts of human organs from Palestinians.
CounterPunch has made a cause celebre of Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel.http://hurryupharry.org/2005/02/27/counterpunch/
CounterPunch’s Alexander Cockburn has advanced the argument that Jews have a stranglehold on the U.S. media.https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/03/12/when-billy-graham-planned-to-kill-one-million-people/
CounterPunch has published bizarre conspiracy theories, such as one piece written by Paul Craig Roberts about the Iranian protests in 2009, with the title “Are the Iranian protests another American orchestrated ‘Color Revolution‘?”
https://www.counterpunch.org/2009/06/19/are-the-iranian-protests-another-us-orchestrated-quot-color-revolution-quot/
CounterPunch‘s Alexander Cockburn has cheered on mass-murderingIslamist terrorists in Iraq.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/07/14/support-their-troops/
CounterPunch has advanced dual loyalty canards about Jews, and xenophobic narratives about how Washington is “occupied” by Israel
https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/05/09/israel-and-congress/
Counterpunch also has often welcomed Eric Walburg, a neo Nazi, to publish at their site. Walburg is also a Holocaust denier who, on the pages of CounterPunch, engaged in pro-Taliban propaganda.
http://hurryupharry.org/2011/08/05/atzmon-and-walberg-two-nazis-discuss-marxism/
CounterPunch published a rant by Jennifer Loewenstein, about a “Gazan Holocaust”, which included a passage referring to Israelis as “Neo-Jewish Masters” who used the Gaza war as a “pretext to carry out mass murder of the Arab Untermenschen.”
CounterPunch published the fascist Holocaust denier, and blood libel promoter, ‘Israel Shamir‘.
https://www.thejc.com/news/world/antisemitic-holocaust-denier-in-charge-of-wikileaks-russian-distribution-1.20035
It is damaging to the Palestinian cause that such a bigoted source is used in its defense.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
First; not everyone, just the usual group of your sycophants who mistake groupthink for answers.
Second, stay in your lane; what you know about self actualization would get lost in a speck of dust.
Third, if you thought for yourself you'd quickly realize those you spend all this time defending are taking advantage of you.
But keep flinging poo. It's what you're best at.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Blah blah.
Your usual debunked canned bullshit.
No-one likes you or your ideas, dumbass.
Take the hint.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Blah blah
Your usual flinging poo without substance.
You're a no one, trying to speak for others and it rings hollow.
Take the hint.
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
Leave for two more days, you're welcome.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Again you see and notice the harsh presentation but fail to see the point being made.
This is why you can't get a woman, you're just completely full of deluded shit talk and never question your views.
You're like a Trunp supporter cos at least they know they're no good at "book learning" and "filling brain with no-ledge and fancy sciency-stuff".
st0wandgrow
Well-Known Member
I like him and his ideas, but what does that matter? Is this a popularity contest? Do you come here and post stuff just to feel liked?
- Status