Instead of replying to individual postings, I'll just sum it up in this post as best as I can.
1.
How many times do I have to explain why I titled this thread like that? Heck, I even apologized for it. Pls read the thread.
2.
How many times do I have to admit that this informal experiment is INCONCLUSIVE? (there in caps).
3.
How many times do I have to admit that this experiment is not controlled, that there's not enough data, not enough plant population, etc.?
4.
How many times do I have to point out that this thread is not about to convince anybody that defoliation works? It's a study(loosely).
=============
I think that pretty much sum it up.
My questions to you guys are these....
1. Assuming that this experiment is a failure, what is a few grams lost to you?
2. Since this is not a 'precise' experiment, is it a failure?
You decide and do what you want to do, either do nothing or duplicate this experiment(loosely). Either way, it doesnt matter to me.
The real conclusion to this issue is....... its not proven or proven that defoliation works.
My final thoughts and I'm ending this thread
I thought that this would be a fun experiment to do (a few grams to sacrifice is worth it) in which we can 'discuss' the different factors(hormones, environment, etc) that might be affected by defoliation, good or bad...I didnt expect to start a war(most be the longest thread in defoliation)
.
So, having said that, I'm not going to re-explain and re-explaining things over and over again.
What is unrational with trying for yourself unproven techniques?
Again, Budley got it right and aptly said, yea or nay.
In that note, I'll keep the final harvest comparison to myself. If you are curious enough, do spare a few grams to try it yourself, it's not the end of the world.
Thread close or continue. I dont care.