We've been over that a dozen times in a dozen threads. Do you need me to reiterate it here, again?
Not straight: she attempted to intimidate members of the media so they would project a more favorable image of Hillary Clinton. Dishonest: she orchestrated a smear campaign against Sanders in WV that he was an atheist, just before the primary, being the chairperson of the DNC. Immoral: she ignored her own bylaws to enrich herself. Evasive: she has denied every corruption charge against her even after the proof was presented and she quite because of it. It's like Trump supporters support 'fake news' that doesn't corroborate their preconceived beliefs, neither do corporate Democrats.
I have no clear idea what specific action DWS took that you refer to. Was it the one where she complained about press coverage at NBC with Chuck Todd? If so, the whole thing isn't a "corrupt act". This is how Todd described it:
Todd told
Mediaite that the email was not remarkable. “I think it’s clear what it was. Someone complaining about coverage,” he said. “Something that happens daily from every campaign we interact with.”
That WV thing never even happened, dumb shit. It was a back and forth what if discussion between two low level derps. Schultz didn't even appear on the distribution list for those memos. It's not even clear that she knew about the discussion. It was banal chatter.
And so, you can't be taken seriously. Your memory of this event is ooooooh so dark and despicable DNC, when the reality is something quite different.
It's clear that the DNC had zero regard for Bernie's campaign and from what you say, it's completely understandable.