It was is more of an estimate than you try to make out, more was destroyed than you say. You should also understand who the party's involved in making the estimates were. With that, you can not guarantee it was impartial. It's like asking Hillary to audit Trump.
You are giving me a angle that I do not hold.. I've already stated I was totally against Hitlers actions, just as much as I was against Churchill bombings and Roose dropping nukes. I have no sympathy what so ever for Nazis or Hitler, I have a shared hate for him, church and roos but this somehow makes me racist against Jews?. I do see the charismatic side of all three, they didn't lead country's for nothing. I do have sympathy for normal German civilians, as with other nations civilians including Jews living both in Germany and neighboring country's. What I do have is massive contempt for historians and all others involved who continually highlighted the Jewish holocaust to the point most other deaths and atrocity's (some equally or greater) during and after the war have been forgotten or over looked, just a foot note. I have no contempt at all for the millions of Jewish people who were caught up in the Nazi machine in any shape or form. If that by your measure makes me a racist nazi sympathetic then check your logic.
The atrocities committed by the allies do not change what Hitler did, I agree and never stated otherwise. How those events are played down historically and the lack of public disgust around them is the difference, they do mater, including Vietnam. If stood close enough, they called Bob Marley the tree that blocked the woods, the woods being all the other reggae musicians of his era. Western history has made the Jewish holocaust such a tree, blocking many other atrocities including it's own.
No race baiting here. You are the intelligent type of person who knows it's better to stick to the easy opinions in order to avoid ridicule. You think and have conflicting opinions of your own but don't have the balls to voice them on risky topics. That makes you worse than the out right ignorant.
I do not lie. On a grey topic like this it is more than possible to acquire miss information and conclusion and if that were true then that would be the case, quite different to out right deceit.
A lie would be to come here and tell you the holocaust never happened at all, knowing it did. I have not made any counter claims to any of the other facts surrounding the holocaust (because I believe them to be true) aside from the figure. I hold that opinion due to the below.
Typed in google ''How many jews died in the holocaust''. The first site states between 5 and 6 million, the rest claim up to or exactly 6 million, point is the number is a constant.
Watch
this / Yes it is a YouTube vid but it shows live evidence of actual newspapers, rather than me linking you to some paraphrased website. Now it's either a huge coincidence that 6 million is the figure used in those separate events in the papers and so happened to be the WW2 holocaust figure or it is a fabrication. When you take into account the constant use of that number and the party's involved in counting the death toll after WW2 I lean towards fabrication.
Again I fail to see how this makes me racist or sympathetic. I dispute one point alone due to the above... because it is genuinely iffy. If in-fact 6 million did die I am very sorry to God and those who suffered. The standing point was the tree that blocked the woods. Look at how offended everybody is getting for questioning part of that tree and focusing only on that.. while down playing the other atrocities I've mentioned. Only goes to show..
