vahpor
Well-Known Member
@sunny747 Efficiency, driver options, and light spread are limiting factors to a single LES design. There are some large cobs (Opto Luna's for ex, check out the thread about them here on RIU) that are designed to be driven hard. They are less efficient, but would probably handle a 4x4 tent by itself. You will need some serious cooling. So, with a larger driver and larger heatsink, you lose some of your 'savings'. It is simpler, but you have a lack of redundancy.
imo/e, cobs advantage is more pronounced when using many les. you get far less heat, far better coverage, w/o that single intense/hot spot. potentially allowing your plants grow more uniform and consistently.
The less efficient, the more heat you have to manage. Efficiency is how much power is converted to light. What isn't converted to light is turned into waste-heat.
Some chips are more efficient than others when driven hard, generally the large chips. ~45% efficiency would be my personal minimum from a modern chip.
Another thing to keep in mind, the cooler the chip, the more efficient it is as well.
Bring on the 1 cob revolution! Even 1 cob is better than throwing away more HID bulbs. And hopefully will get you to build some more LED devices.
imo/e, cobs advantage is more pronounced when using many les. you get far less heat, far better coverage, w/o that single intense/hot spot. potentially allowing your plants grow more uniform and consistently.
The less efficient, the more heat you have to manage. Efficiency is how much power is converted to light. What isn't converted to light is turned into waste-heat.
Some chips are more efficient than others when driven hard, generally the large chips. ~45% efficiency would be my personal minimum from a modern chip.
Another thing to keep in mind, the cooler the chip, the more efficient it is as well.
Bring on the 1 cob revolution! Even 1 cob is better than throwing away more HID bulbs. And hopefully will get you to build some more LED devices.
Last edited: