One Doctor Certifies 11,800 in a year-- Let's lose our Freaking Minds...

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
LARA Audits MMJ Doctors
Audit Says Doctor Sees 11,800 Patients a Year- Waiting Rooms Still Full

LARA has just released the results of an audit of medical marijuana certification doctors. As always, they are making a big play that less that 25 doctors have seen some 56% of all certification patients in Michigan and one doctor (gasp) saw 11,800 patients in 2015. First, let me make it clear, that one doctor was not me, though I wish it was and so does my checking account. I think a good number of attorneys wish it was me as well, because my certifications are pretty easy to defend and use for Section 8 hearings due to our high standards and procedures. But as an experienced primary care doctor, I think I should put some of these numbers in perspective.

First, the quote we are seeing that the ‘average’ doctor sees 11-20 patients a day is nonsense. That volume may be at the ‘peak’ of the bell curve, but it is a pretty wide bell curve. Problems with this average is that it seems to be the answer to ‘how many do you want to see’ rather than how many do you actually see. Second there is no breakdown between doctors that are paid by the hour and those in private practice that are paid by the patient. When I was in private practice in Internal Medicine, I worked from 8-5 or later every day. Assuming an hour for breaks, food, bathroom, or whatever, that is a good 8 hours a day. I averaged about 5 patients an hour, or 40 per day. Some had simple problems and only took 5 min, other were more complicated and took an hour. Each got as much time as they needed. Of note, when I worked for the VA, my ‘full load’ was 8-12 patients a day. With 1/2 a day off on Thursdays to do ‘administrative paperwork’. Volumes depend on the setting and need.

Five patients an hour is 12 min a patient. Is that enough? Actually, yes for an organized and experienced doctor. My first full history and physical in medical school took 5 hours. My last hospital H&P took 20min, but the patient had quite a few problems. Second, I don’t greet the patient at the door to the office, get their clipboard and paperwork together, help them fill it out, see them, and check them out. That whole process may take an hour. That’s why I have staff. Trained staff. They get the patient and paperwork together, I meet the patient and evaluate them/answer questions, the staff then helps them with the nuts and bolts of the application and gets signatures, etc. We all do our part to give the patient a comprehensive visit. In Internal Medicine, I saw between 30 and 45 patients a day, and I was on the LOW end of the volume in my town. Plus 10-15 in the Hospital after work. As a small town doctor, I worked 7 days a week for months at a time, and when not seeing patients, was required to be within 45 min of the hospital.

A typical, but busy, primary care doctor such as me seeing a typical patient load of 35 patients a day and working a 5 day week would see 9,100 patients a year. Note that isn’t even at ‘full capacity’ of 40 patients per day, nor does it account for weekends (recall I had a hospital load of 10-15 per day, weekends included, and I didn’t count that in the numbers for my outpatient office practice). So to get real for a moment, the headline of ‘One Doctor Saw 11,800 Patients’ is only abnormal because it was ‘presented’ as abnormal. I would present it as a ‘light load’ for a small town solo practitioner.

Are There Problems with Certification Clinics?
Are there problems with certification clinics? OF COURSE THERE ARE. The Main Problem is that they are needed at all. When 63% of Michigan Voters approved the MMMA in 2008, there was an implied understanding that, once approved, qualified patients would be able to see their primary care doctors and get their certification. Unfortunately, this did not occur. In fact, many patients are now AFRAID to discuss it with their doctors. First, we see many offices post signs in their (full) waiting rooms instructing patients not to even ask about medical marijuana. Second, many doctors not only refuse to look into medical marijuana, they dismiss or cut off pain medication when they discover their patient has a card.

This is something that really concerns me as a physician. In order to properly treat my patients, I need them to feel comfortable telling me their secrets. I need to know about the state of their health, their complaints, and what they are doing about it. I need to know their vices and marital infidelities, so I know to look for things. I need to know if they find something that helps them, not only because I want to know about what they are doing, but because it may help my other patients.

That is how my patients working through narcotic withdrawals got me interested in medical marijuana (which was helping them greatly with withdrawal). If the average primary care physician learned that they had several patients reduce their need for narcotic pain medicine by 50% simply by eating celery, how long would it be before they recommended celery to all their pain management patients? Not long at all, because doctors don’t like writing narcotics. Yet change celery to medical marijuana, and they lose their freaking minds and start punishing patients by cutting them off, putting them in withdrawal and dismissing them from their practice. How do you reconcile that with ‘Do No Harm’??? Don’t even get me started on lawyers (judges and prosecutors) demanding people be taken off ‘celery’ and put back on hard narcotics and ulcer causing NSAID’s.

Where to from here?
Without getting into legalization and decriminalization, what should we do with the current certification system? First, since primary care doctors are not participating, we will have certification clinics and doctors that spend most of their time doing certifications. It is not unexpected that there are relatively low numbers of doctors in this field. Hospitals and large clinics generally do not allow their doctors to do certifications, either does the VA. As a result only private practice doctors (especially solo providers) are the only ones that can really become certification doctors, and there are relatively few available. Many already have busy practices, don’t know much about the field, or simply don’t wish to be known as ‘pot doctors’. But there were 55 doctors doing most of the certifications in 2011 (the last time a number was reported), now we are fewer than 25. Patient numbers are higher than ever. Our waiting rooms are full, and we are seeing the patients.

Using patient numbers to imply improper certifications or to label individual doctors as ‘problem doctors’ is not accurate. Assuming physicians are following the law- Seeing patients in person (not on Skype or through the mail), reviewing records and doing follow ups, more power to them. They found a market and are meeting the needs of that market in a professional way. If I were LARA, I would concentrate on doctors that don’t do certifications correctly. Doctors that do renewals through the mail, or see patients on Skype. Doctors that have been to court and have had their certifications overturned. Was it an isolated ‘bad’ visit or a pattern of cutting corners or ‘signing for dollars’? That is a question for a LARA investigator to answer. Perhaps rather than look at a spreadsheet and say a doctor is ‘bad’ because they are busy, they should actually work and identify problems in procedures and those that don’t follow the law.

Bonus Feature!
Do you want to learn more about medical marijuana and the patients that use it? Have a look at the last 2 years worth of statistics from our practice– Average ages, condition breakdowns, ages by conditions etc.
 

Michiganjesse

Well-Known Member
LARA Audits MMJ Doctors
Audit Says Doctor Sees 11,800 Patients a Year- Waiting Rooms Still Full

LARA has just released the results of an audit of medical marijuana certification doctors. As always, they are making a big play that less that 25 doctors have seen some 56% of all certification patients in Michigan and one doctor (gasp) saw 11,800 patients in 2015. First, let me make it clear, that one doctor was not me, though I wish it was and so does my checking account. I think a good number of attorneys wish it was me as well, because my certifications are pretty easy to defend and use for Section 8 hearings due to our high standards and procedures. But as an experienced primary care doctor, I think I should put some of these numbers in perspective.

First, the quote we are seeing that the ‘average’ doctor sees 11-20 patients a day is nonsense. That volume may be at the ‘peak’ of the bell curve, but it is a pretty wide bell curve. Problems with this average is that it seems to be the answer to ‘how many do you want to see’ rather than how many do you actually see. Second there is no breakdown between doctors that are paid by the hour and those in private practice that are paid by the patient. When I was in private practice in Internal Medicine, I worked from 8-5 or later every day. Assuming an hour for breaks, food, bathroom, or whatever, that is a good 8 hours a day. I averaged about 5 patients an hour, or 40 per day. Some had simple problems and only took 5 min, other were more complicated and took an hour. Each got as much time as they needed. Of note, when I worked for the VA, my ‘full load’ was 8-12 patients a day. With 1/2 a day off on Thursdays to do ‘administrative paperwork’. Volumes depend on the setting and need.

Five patients an hour is 12 min a patient. Is that enough? Actually, yes for an organized and experienced doctor. My first full history and physical in medical school took 5 hours. My last hospital H&P took 20min, but the patient had quite a few problems. Second, I don’t greet the patient at the door to the office, get their clipboard and paperwork together, help them fill it out, see them, and check them out. That whole process may take an hour. That’s why I have staff. Trained staff. They get the patient and paperwork together, I meet the patient and evaluate them/answer questions, the staff then helps them with the nuts and bolts of the application and gets signatures, etc. We all do our part to give the patient a comprehensive visit. In Internal Medicine, I saw between 30 and 45 patients a day, and I was on the LOW end of the volume in my town. Plus 10-15 in the Hospital after work. As a small town doctor, I worked 7 days a week for months at a time, and when not seeing patients, was required to be within 45 min of the hospital.

A typical, but busy, primary care doctor such as me seeing a typical patient load of 35 patients a day and working a 5 day week would see 9,100 patients a year. Note that isn’t even at ‘full capacity’ of 40 patients per day, nor does it account for weekends (recall I had a hospital load of 10-15 per day, weekends included, and I didn’t count that in the numbers for my outpatient office practice). So to get real for a moment, the headline of ‘One Doctor Saw 11,800 Patients’ is only abnormal because it was ‘presented’ as abnormal. I would present it as a ‘light load’ for a small town solo practitioner.

Are There Problems with Certification Clinics?
Are there problems with certification clinics? OF COURSE THERE ARE. The Main Problem is that they are needed at all. When 63% of Michigan Voters approved the MMMA in 2008, there was an implied understanding that, once approved, qualified patients would be able to see their primary care doctors and get their certification. Unfortunately, this did not occur. In fact, many patients are now AFRAID to discuss it with their doctors. First, we see many offices post signs in their (full) waiting rooms instructing patients not to even ask about medical marijuana. Second, many doctors not only refuse to look into medical marijuana, they dismiss or cut off pain medication when they discover their patient has a card.

This is something that really concerns me as a physician. In order to properly treat my patients, I need them to feel comfortable telling me their secrets. I need to know about the state of their health, their complaints, and what they are doing about it. I need to know their vices and marital infidelities, so I know to look for things. I need to know if they find something that helps them, not only because I want to know about what they are doing, but because it may help my other patients.

That is how my patients working through narcotic withdrawals got me interested in medical marijuana (which was helping them greatly with withdrawal). If the average primary care physician learned that they had several patients reduce their need for narcotic pain medicine by 50% simply by eating celery, how long would it be before they recommended celery to all their pain management patients? Not long at all, because doctors don’t like writing narcotics. Yet change celery to medical marijuana, and they lose their freaking minds and start punishing patients by cutting them off, putting them in withdrawal and dismissing them from their practice. How do you reconcile that with ‘Do No Harm’??? Don’t even get me started on lawyers (judges and prosecutors) demanding people be taken off ‘celery’ and put back on hard narcotics and ulcer causing NSAID’s.

Where to from here?
Without getting into legalization and decriminalization, what should we do with the current certification system? First, since primary care doctors are not participating, we will have certification clinics and doctors that spend most of their time doing certifications. It is not unexpected that there are relatively low numbers of doctors in this field. Hospitals and large clinics generally do not allow their doctors to do certifications, either does the VA. As a result only private practice doctors (especially solo providers) are the only ones that can really become certification doctors, and there are relatively few available. Many already have busy practices, don’t know much about the field, or simply don’t wish to be known as ‘pot doctors’. But there were 55 doctors doing most of the certifications in 2011 (the last time a number was reported), now we are fewer than 25. Patient numbers are higher than ever. Our waiting rooms are full, and we are seeing the patients.

Using patient numbers to imply improper certifications or to label individual doctors as ‘problem doctors’ is not accurate. Assuming physicians are following the law- Seeing patients in person (not on Skype or through the mail), reviewing records and doing follow ups, more power to them. They found a market and are meeting the needs of that market in a professional way. If I were LARA, I would concentrate on doctors that don’t do certifications correctly. Doctors that do renewals through the mail, or see patients on Skype. Doctors that have been to court and have had their certifications overturned. Was it an isolated ‘bad’ visit or a pattern of cutting corners or ‘signing for dollars’? That is a question for a LARA investigator to answer. Perhaps rather than look at a spreadsheet and say a doctor is ‘bad’ because they are busy, they should actually work and identify problems in procedures and those that don’t follow the law.

Bonus Feature!
Do you want to learn more about medical marijuana and the patients that use it? Have a look at the last 2 years worth of statistics from our practice– Average ages, condition breakdowns, ages by conditions etc.
Very good read
 

Skylor

Well-Known Member
Well the ones who do not care for MM are now seeing its a lost cause to fight it, so they are now trying to scare the doctors from certifying people.

If I seen a sign in my doctors office saying don;t talk-ask about MM, that be the first thing out of my mouth, ha ha. IMO, too many people are using other drugs to treat issues that MM is better to help. I feel its better to first try MM and give it a chance to work before using other drugs. Don't forget that alcohol is also a drug, a very powerful drug that can interfere with your sleep. Just cause you might pass out after drinking and sleep all night long, doesn't mean it was a restful sleep.

When I was in my 20's and 30's, I could get by with just 3 to 5 hours of sleep and yet feel great most all day long. I stopped drinking booze when I was just 25 years old. I noticed if i never drank alcohol, I needed less sleep to feel good the next day. Sure I get thirsty, that is what water and Koolaid is for.
 
Last edited:

Skylor

Well-Known Member
"Seeing patients in person (not on Skype or through the mail)"




U know many courts use video feeds for court hearings. U don't have to be at the court house to "see" a judge, they now do it with video cameras , so why isn't video OK for MM certification's ?

If i got no leg and are having pain issues with my missing limb, does a doctor really need to see me in person to recommend MM for my pain, NOPE. That is an extreme example but saying a doctor needs to see every person, in person and not by video, isn't always correct. Getting out of the house and to a doctors office can be a major workout for some people, I could see how mailing your medical records to the doctor and "visiting" him by video feed, could be OK for a few of the people out there.
 
Last edited:

Skylor

Well-Known Member
Very sad to see that those over the age of 75 years are the least percentage. I would think that those over 75 years, would be the ones that MM could help the most ! I bet the oldies are the ones pooping the most pills each day !
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
"Seeing patients in person (not on Skype or through the mail)"




U know many courts use video feeds for court hearings. U don't have to be at the court house to "see" a judge, they now do it with video cameras , so why isn't video OK for MM certification's ?

If i got no leg and are having pain issues with my missing limb, does a doctor really need to see me in person to recommend MM for my pain, NOPE. That is an extreme example but saying a doctor needs to see every person, in person and not by video, isn't always correct. Getting out of the house and to a doctors office can be a major workout for some people, I could see how mailing your medical records to the doctor and "visiting" him by video feed, could be OK for a few of the people out there.
iI agreed and argued for telemed but they were very clear they were not going to allow it and didn't. but that is the rule.
 

phaquetoo

Well-Known Member
That would be 118k a yr, I would think the dr. that wrote that many did alot more dr.ing lol, that isnt alot of money for their kind of education!

I would like to think if I went to med school for as long as these guys go they would make more than 118k a yr!

we need around 20 dr.s doing that many certs a yr, we need our own pc's writing rec's and renew's!

Peace
 

outsideinthecold

Active Member
I see an MD locally (Doctor of Internal Medicine) as my primary care physician. Not unusual to spend about as much time with him, or less than I do with MJ Doctor in Kalamazoo for my MMJ certs. I have my local physician linked to my MJ doctor so my records are available to either.

My mom was Michigan's oldest MMJ patient until she died at 99 (I am 70). She used a topical oil externally on her degenerative arthritic back with some positive results. It was humorous to watch the local lead judge wife's reaction when my mom would promote MMJ at her bridge club.

One reason I see two doctors is I appreciate and support those who have spent years in medical school and hospitals to earn the certifications Prohibitionists are determined to put at risk. Doctor a Bob won't remember but I thanked him once personally at the SWMiCC in Buchanan.

While my recent experiences during visits to Oregon and Washington haven't completely sold me on legalization, I am a strong believer in MMJ. I only wonder why alcohol and/or tobacco users aren't required to obtain the same certification MMJ patients do. This is a question I enjoy asking my local MI legislators during their local meet-and-greets. Try it yourself sometime.

I would encourage every MMJ patient to attend their Michigan representatives and senators public events. It can make a difference. MMJ isn't about Democrats or Republicans, it is about personal choice and lifestyle wellness.

Thanks to RIU and the Michigan patients who frequent this site. Let's make it better.
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
I see an MD locally (Doctor of Internal Medicine) as my primary care physician. Not unusual to spend about as much time with him, or less than I do with MJ Doctor in Kalamazoo for my MMJ certs. I have my local physician linked to my MJ doctor so my records are available to either.

My mom was Michigan's oldest MMJ patient until she died at 99 (I am 70). She used a topical oil externally on her degenerative arthritic back with some positive results. It was humorous to watch the local lead judge wife's reaction when my mom would promote MMJ at her bridge club.

One reason I see two doctors is I appreciate and support those who have spent years in medical school and hospitals to earn the certifications Prohibitionists are determined to put at risk. Doctor a Bob won't remember but I thanked him once personally at the SWMiCC in Buchanan.

While my recent experiences during visits to Oregon and Washington haven't completely sold me on legalization, I am a strong believer in MMJ. I only wonder why alcohol and/or tobacco users aren't required to obtain the same certification MMJ patients do. This is a question I enjoy asking my local MI legislators during their local meet-and-greets. Try it yourself sometime.

I would encourage every MMJ patient to attend their Michigan representatives and senators public events. It can make a difference. MMJ isn't about Democrats or Republicans, it is about personal choice and lifestyle wellness.

Thanks to RIU and the Michigan patients who frequent this site. Let's make it better.
Well thank you, I am sure with your real name I would remember you!
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
"Seeing patients in person (not on Skype or through the mail)"




U know many courts use video feeds for court hearings. U don't have to be at the court house to "see" a judge, they now do it with video cameras , so why isn't video OK for MM certification's ?

If i got no leg and are having pain issues with my missing limb, does a doctor really need to see me in person to recommend MM for my pain, NOPE. That is an extreme example but saying a doctor needs to see every person, in person and not by video, isn't always correct. Getting out of the house and to a doctors office can be a major workout for some people, I could see how mailing your medical records to the doctor and "visiting" him by video feed, could be OK for a few of the people out there.
Actually you are preaching to the choir. I personally argued for telemedicine before the house judiciary and in the formulation of the bonafide dr/pt relationship bill. It was one thing I was NOT able to get into the definition. Despite pointing out the committee in the next room was approving telemedicine for traditional medicine, they INSISTED in an 'in person' visit with the doctor and the patient in the same room. Clinics continue to do Skype, and will argue all day it is allowed, but I was there and know personally that they were very specific when they did not allow it for certifications.

To my knowledge, no one has gone to jail over Skype.... YET... but the state is auditing certification clinics and gathering data (read that evidence) for the next round of attacks. Don't be a test case, get an in person visit with the doctor just as the 'plain reading' of the law says to.

Dr. Bob
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
Very sad to see that those over the age of 75 years are the least percentage. I would think that those over 75 years, would be the ones that MM could help the most ! I bet the oldies are the ones pooping the most pills each day !
There are several areas we could be doing better. Those over 75 are a low percentage of the population, yet have many conditions that qualify them for a card. Also, we have a relatively low percentage of cancer, aids and glaucoma patients. Back when the state first started breaking down by condition, I calculated less than 300 AIDS patients had a card out of 19,000 or so in the state.

The reason we have low percentages of AIDS and Cancer patients is, as I see it, they are generally treated in specialty clinics where they don't get information about cannabis. Pain patients are everywhere, in every practice, and talk about their conditions with each other, so word gets out. We need to get AIDS and Cancer patients talking... The more they are engaged and looking at different treatments, the more they will take notice of MMJ.

Have YOU talked to a cancer patient, or aids/glaucoma, crohn's patient today? If not, help get the word out about cannabis. Join a BB for AIDS, Cancer or one of the other conditions, especially if you have it yourself. Tell of your experience and encourage them to learn more. I don't really care where they get their card, as long as they get into the program somewhere and start getting some benefit from cannabis.

Dr. Bob
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
Sadly Dr Bob most of our families stricken with terminal illness such as cancer and AIDS are bankrupt by our medical establishment quickly and forced into Medicaid (if lucky). These families simply cannot afford a medical marijuana certification and licence, no less to purchase cannabis regularly on such a fixed income leaving only 30$ per month for incidentals.

Sadly any relief many of these individuals will ever find is generosity in secrecy by someone risking their families well being along with the patients to the criminal justice system ...

We need to address the problems with the top 10% if we ever hope to address this systematic poverty and suffering. The failures of the War on Drugs is not so different from the failures of the War on Poverty. Regulatory Capture designed by wealthy elitists morality is always at a cost to the "protected" no? We need new answers to the same old problems ...

 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
Sadly Dr Bob most of our families stricken with terminal illness such as cancer and AIDS are bankrupt by our medical establishment quickly and forced into Medicaid (if lucky). These families simply cannot afford a medical marijuana certification and licence, no less to purchase cannabis regularly on such a fixed income leaving only 30$ per month for incidentals.

Sadly any relief many of these individuals will ever find is generosity in secrecy by someone risking their families well being along with the patients to the criminal justice system ...

We need to address the problems with the top 10% if we ever hope to address this systematic poverty and suffering. The failures of the War on Drugs is not so different from the failures of the War on Poverty. Regulatory Capture designed by wealthy elitists morality is always at a cost to the "protected" no? We need new answers to the same old problems ...
Point taken, but you should know we take care of Hospice patients an a very low cost. I've also not turned away patients in need over money. One gave me our dog Gracie after I comp'ed his cert and paid his state fee myself.

Dr. Bob
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
I'm not trying to shame you Dr. Bob, I'm just trying to share the perception/reality of these patients you speak of.

Having worked over a decade in our healthcare system, I know many front line (patient contact) Docs see/feel the financial pain of their patients. It's when those doctors work their way up into healthcare administration becoming a vested part of the Broker/Deal Maker game that things get ugly. Without patient contact (aka reality) to ground these individuals, all they can see is the wealthy elitist ladder ...
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
I'm not trying to shame you Dr. Bob, I'm just trying to share the perception/reality of these patients you speak of.

Having worked over a decade in our healthcare system, I know many front line (patient contact) Docs see/feel the financial pain of their patients. It's when those doctors work their way up into healthcare administration becoming a vested part of the Broker/Deal Maker game that things get ugly. Without patient contact (aka reality) to ground these individuals, all they can see is the wealthy elitist ladder ...
I wasn't shamed, I just wanted to throw that out.
 

pergamum362

Well-Known Member
I have had a few aids patients over the years. These individuals are usually as you say. All of the ones that were connected to me, now grow thier own. I can tell you that mm helped them immensly, not so much with the actual condition, but by combating the nasty side effects of the pharma they HAVE to take.
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
I have had a few aids patients over the years. These individuals are usually as you say. All of the ones that were connected to me, now grow thier own. I can tell you that mm helped them immensly, not so much with the actual condition, but by combating the nasty side effects of the pharma they HAVE to take.
We need to get the word out, these are people we can help...
 

chemphlegm

Well-Known Member
Aids patients seeing a physician who will desert him if said patient tests positive for marijuana. thats the problem. YOU need to get the word out, other physicians dont listen much to us patients on that matter. People who could really benefit using this natural plant
are being oppressed by physicians daily. Their pain is continued because a medical professional or their guideline rules sate NO marijuana. This is the problem. The DEA says cbd oil has NO medical value, its now scheduled 1 !DEA says cannabis has NO medical value. Where is the revolution, this is absurd government in bed with big pharma quite clearly, they all are. The doctors that desert their patients, the physicians that wont allow or help a patient with a marijuana referral are doing this for money. they do it for stock dividends. they do it for greed, they do it at the expense of every patient, and every citizen at that. This needs to change, someone needs to get the word out that we are being scammed by the medical community this very moment, while they suck the pharma nipple. no amount of obamacare will keep up with the no cap pricing of pharma products. why can they charge anything they want....because its a scam. physicians, gubment, pharmacies, big pharma, wall street, all in bed, facking us hard.

doctors like yourself are pioneers, brave souls that wont be forgotten. I understand what you put on the line for the marijuana community, at least some of it. I commend what you do, thank you Dr. Bob
 

Dr. Bob

Well-Known Member
I do talk to other physicians about this. Unfortunately many simply do not listen to their patients or care. Same goes with good pain management, addiction therapy, and many other things. Rather sad in fact. Even sued a pharmacy for refusing to fill a script for a patient once and won. There are things that can be done.
 

Skylor

Well-Known Member
Michigan has MM but one group of people who could really benefit from MM can not use it.

I'm thinking about those who live a group therapy home, or are in the hospital. u can get morphine in any hospital but light up a joint and U risk being booted out so fast.

Getting chemo, how dare you light up but u can pop as many pain pills as U please.
 
Top