londonfog
Well-Known Member
Running a stop sign is illegal and unlawful. End of story
All the news that isn't
- Thread starter choomer
- Start date
-
- Tags
- fake news political
- Status
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
You got fined cos you were driving like a retard.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So, you would have told a slave (maybe your ancestor) that he had to stay enslaved, because his running away was "illegal and unlawful" , end of story!
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I see you have no answer. You make statements but yet you can't back them up. How do you think you will get people to see your point ?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
You literally just said "every rectangle is a square. End of story".
Congrats on your logical fallacy.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Are you comparing traffic laws that can save lives to slavery which took lives ? Damn you want to win this argument bad. sorry you fail.
I'm so disappointment in my ancestor for not killing all slave owners. Nat Turner was an underachiever
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
I got fined because I have a contract with my signature on it that says I may be fined on a technicality even though there was no crime.
For no other reason. There was not crime. No victim. No wrong doing. Yet you advocate this system, the same exact system that would let an actual crime skeet on a technicality because they can afford the best lawyer.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
nope I said running a stop sign is illegal and unlawful. To say otherwise is retarded and can bring harm to others.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Preemptive action is what you're about then. The Minority Report. Then you condone US military action as well.
You condone racial profiling because according to you it would fall under "legal and lawful".
Mind you, you're doing all this while being completely ignorant of what is Legal and what is Lawful. I dare say it's technically "legal" to go to war without a declaration. However its completely unLawful.
Yet you don't see a difference, interesting.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
were is racial profiling legal ? Please name state.
Sorry you hate traffic laws. I feel they are needed to assure safe driving. I would hate to see everyone just running stop signs because they think it is not unlawful to do so. I guess you also think driving drunk is awesome. You do realize Minority Report was a movie and not the news.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
I've given up replying, he's obviously very very high on methamphetamine.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Sorry, just don't buy it. Its a scientific fact that most people do the right thing most of the time.
Leave the traffic signs up. They're great suggestions. Fine and imprison anyone who causes harm or loss by negligently ignoring those suggestions we, society, all agree are reasonable.
But stop harassing poor people because safely speeding 10mph over the limit.
You literally are saying "my feelings are needed for you to drive safely".
Screw your feelings. I feel I didn't harm anyone and will argue that successfully, in court. Regardless of your arbitrary feelings because you are ignorant of what a law is.
Finally, on topic. I realize "the news" is largely theater these days. Kudos on your being able to pick up in that innuendo.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
"is it wrong to be more sexually attracted to your own daughter than your wife?"
the guy you voted for said this in reference to his own daughter when she was just 13 years old.
he will also be going to court on the charge of raping a 13 year old child at the house of convicted pedophile jeffrey epstein.
worry about your own mess first, pietard.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Lame. Negligence is negligence with running a stop sign without looking or passing out cannabis to minors.
There is absolutely nothing unlawful about cannabis for adults and safely running a stop sign in the middle of the night with no others present except the cops.
I can't believe that you cannot grasp this concept.
Where is the Constitutional Amendment that bans cannabis again Mr Turbo Tax?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Simple question for @londonfog ...
I ran a stop sign safely. No one and no property was injured.
Can you show us all who is the victim?
I ran a stop sign safely. No one and no property was injured.
Can you show us all who is the victim?
choomer
Well-Known Member
For those that wanted to turn this into a pedo thread I have one word for you........
pizzagate.
For those that think the wealthy and powerful don't get away w/ it I have one name......
Jimmy Savile.
Now back to the original topic of the news (not being the news):
'The Washington Post has a history of misrepresenting Ron Paul’s views. Last year the supposed newspaper of record ran a feature article by David A. Fahrenthold in which Fahrenthold grossly mischaracterized Paul as an advocate for calamity, oppression, and poverty — the opposite of the goals Paul routinely expresses and, indeed, expressed clearly in a speech at the event upon which Fahrenthold’s article purported to report. Such fraudulent attacks on the prominent advocate for liberty and a noninterventionist foreign policy fall in line with the newspaper’s agenda. As Future of Freedom Foundation President Jacob G. Hornberger put it in a February editorial, the Post’s agenda is guided by “the interventionist mindset that undergirds the mainstream media.”
On Thursday, the Post published a new article by Craig Timberg complaining of a “flood” of so-called fake news supported by “a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy,” To advance this conclusion, Timberg points to PropOrNot, an organization of anonymous individuals formed this year, as having identified “more than 200 websites as routine peddlers of Russian propaganda during the election season.” Look on the PropOrNot list. There is the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity’s (RPI) website RonPaulInstitute.org listed among websites termed “Russian propaganda outlets.”
What you will not find on the PropOrNot website is any particularized analysis of why the RPI website, or any website for that matter, is included on the list. Instead, you will see only sweeping generalizations from an anonymous organization. The very popular website drudgereport.com even makes the list. While listed websites span the gamut of political ideas, they tend to share in common an independence from the mainstream media.
Timberg’s article can be seen as yet another big media attempt to shift the blame for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s loss of the presidential election away from Clinton, her campaign, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) that undermined Sen Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) challenge to Clinton in the Democratic primary.
The article may also be seen as another step in the effort to deter people from looking to alternative sources of information by labeling those information sources as traitorous or near-traitorous.
At the same time, the article may be seen as playing a role in the ongoing push to increase tensions between the United States and Russia — a result that benefits people, including those involved in the military-industrial complex, who profit from the growth of US “national security” activity in America and overseas.
This is not the first time Ron Paul and his institute has been attacked for sounding pro-Russian or anti-American. Such attacks have been advanced even by self-proclaimed libertarians.
Expect that such attacks will continue. They are an effort to tar Paul and his institute so people will close themselves off from information Paul and RPI provide each day in furtherance of the institute’s mission to continue and expand Paul’s “lifetime of public advocacy for a peaceful foreign policy and the protection of civil liberties at home.” While peace and liberty will benefit most people, powerful interests seek to prevent the realization of these objectives. Indeed, expect attacks against RPI to escalate as the institute continues to reach growing numbers of people with its educational effort.'
pizzagate.
For those that think the wealthy and powerful don't get away w/ it I have one name......
Jimmy Savile.
Now back to the original topic of the news (not being the news):
'The Washington Post has a history of misrepresenting Ron Paul’s views. Last year the supposed newspaper of record ran a feature article by David A. Fahrenthold in which Fahrenthold grossly mischaracterized Paul as an advocate for calamity, oppression, and poverty — the opposite of the goals Paul routinely expresses and, indeed, expressed clearly in a speech at the event upon which Fahrenthold’s article purported to report. Such fraudulent attacks on the prominent advocate for liberty and a noninterventionist foreign policy fall in line with the newspaper’s agenda. As Future of Freedom Foundation President Jacob G. Hornberger put it in a February editorial, the Post’s agenda is guided by “the interventionist mindset that undergirds the mainstream media.”
On Thursday, the Post published a new article by Craig Timberg complaining of a “flood” of so-called fake news supported by “a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy,” To advance this conclusion, Timberg points to PropOrNot, an organization of anonymous individuals formed this year, as having identified “more than 200 websites as routine peddlers of Russian propaganda during the election season.” Look on the PropOrNot list. There is the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity’s (RPI) website RonPaulInstitute.org listed among websites termed “Russian propaganda outlets.”
What you will not find on the PropOrNot website is any particularized analysis of why the RPI website, or any website for that matter, is included on the list. Instead, you will see only sweeping generalizations from an anonymous organization. The very popular website drudgereport.com even makes the list. While listed websites span the gamut of political ideas, they tend to share in common an independence from the mainstream media.
Timberg’s article can be seen as yet another big media attempt to shift the blame for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s loss of the presidential election away from Clinton, her campaign, and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) that undermined Sen Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) challenge to Clinton in the Democratic primary.
The article may also be seen as another step in the effort to deter people from looking to alternative sources of information by labeling those information sources as traitorous or near-traitorous.
At the same time, the article may be seen as playing a role in the ongoing push to increase tensions between the United States and Russia — a result that benefits people, including those involved in the military-industrial complex, who profit from the growth of US “national security” activity in America and overseas.
This is not the first time Ron Paul and his institute has been attacked for sounding pro-Russian or anti-American. Such attacks have been advanced even by self-proclaimed libertarians.
Expect that such attacks will continue. They are an effort to tar Paul and his institute so people will close themselves off from information Paul and RPI provide each day in furtherance of the institute’s mission to continue and expand Paul’s “lifetime of public advocacy for a peaceful foreign policy and the protection of civil liberties at home.” While peace and liberty will benefit most people, powerful interests seek to prevent the realization of these objectives. Indeed, expect attacks against RPI to escalate as the institute continues to reach growing numbers of people with its educational effort.'
- Status