I remember people here promoting the idea that her 30 years of prior public experience was one of the reasons she won the Democratic primary. Now that she lost, it turns into "25 years of propaganda against her"...
Agreed with everything but the bold
I'm not sure I understand your question
Yeah here on RIU some are so stuck in what they say and believe it is no getting trough to them, so calling them a dumb arse ignorant POS is the best thing to do. Think Thickstemz and let me know if I'm right.
In what way is that "the best thing to do"?
Oh the irony
I will send this your way. You can have all the decent conversations you like.
I know I know I should stop acting so uppity and just accept what is being said.
With the -- trigger warning -- retarded? No thanks
Right, because once you're a Supreme Court Justice, you live at least 100 more years
I don't believe that Hillary was wrong for calling Trump out for his racist and sexist remarks. Of course that needs to be done. In fact, I don't take issue with much of what Hillary said throughout the election. The problem was, it was Hillary saying it. When you have a candidate that gives speeches to wall st execs at $250k a pop, tells those same bankers that she believes one thing privately but tells the rest of us lemmings another thing publicly, and has a 30 year track record of being in bed with big business...do you think people are going to trust her? Do you think people are going to believe that she is going to go to bat for the working class? Do you think they're going to believe anything she says?
Damn, it does seem like it sometimes, doesn't it?
something that happens on november 6th will not show up on polls by november 7th, dummy.
Why the fuck would I want to let the Chump dictate MY message?!
Umm, no, it's OK to call racists racist, or at least that's what I've gleaned from our conversation. I haven't seen you say that to anybody who isn't. What could possibly be wrong with calling @Flaming Pie one after the pains she's gone to to make sure we know she is one?
You don't have to accept it. You just have to realize that not everyone is going to have the same level of outrage as you over perceived racism, and by branding those people racists because they don't lose their shit over every single comment you're alienating people, and reinforcing the stereotype that liberals are a bunch of overly- sensitive, whiny babies.
good job on telling a black man to stop complaining about racism so much.
Did you even read my post? I never told him to stop complaining about racism. I told him that not everyone is going to find something racist when he does, and just because they don't, that doesn't in turn make them "racist".
you told him that by pointing out racism, he is "alienating people" and coming off as an "overly sensitive, whiny baby".
The 25 years of propaganda against her was just made up shit or stretched truth that never went anywhere. It was baggage going into the campaign. Her experience was based upon fact. I see no conflict in recognizing both.
Not crying foul here but am recognizing that the FBI broke DOJ's own guidelines, first by commenting on an open investigation, second by taking an action that could influence an election. Did it shift the vote by a few percent? I don't know but it sure looks like it.
What I said:
Why was the only alternative to her an unknown old white man?
No, read it again. Twice if you have to. I told him that by branding people as racists because they don't share his same level of outrage, he is alienating people.
You are stiff as a wooden dowel over Trump, admit it. You've gone over to him like a teenager over his first sweetheart.