FBI NOT GOING TO RECOMMEND INDICTMENT!!

[londonfog]

Giving a person legal license to initiate force to determine the use of another persons property and body...how does that protect everyone's right to self determine ?


What is an "official citizen" ?

you are a official citizen when you accepted and used that social security number. The same one you use to file taxes with. Your kids became citizens when you agreed to it by signing the Birth certificate and allowing them to get a SS

 

[Rob Roy]

you are a official citizen when you accepted and used that social security number. The same one you use to file taxes with. Your kids became citizens when you agreed to it by signing the Birth certificate and allowing them to get a SS

We need more people like this guy..,

 

[Ry16]

you are a official citizen when you accepted and used that social security number. The same one you use to file taxes with. Your kids became citizens when you agreed to it by signing the Birth certificate and allowing them to get a SS

Which is clearly flawed and if that process continued the entire econemy would collapse due to lack of labour and resources due to the increased amount consumers unable to find labour to feed themselves which would lead to riots and the deterioration of that country. Countries can only support a certain amount of people and I'm sorry to say it but its the cold hard truth.

 

[Rob Roy]

Some one who is either born in that country or has a professional level contribution to that countries economy in my opinion.

So what establishes the legitimacy of a political entity known as a "country" ?

 

[Ry16]

So what establishes the legitimacy of a political entity known as a "country" ?

I would think it is a collection of individuals working towards a safe and stable environment for future generations to flourish in.

Our current state is exactly the opposite.

 

[doublejj]

We need more people like this guy..,

View attachment 3818361

Hillary supporter...

 

[Fogdog]

You really think he would have a chance at that? We have evolved a lot as a species over the last few decades and we are a lot more tolerant to other peoples ways of life.

Trump will not be able to change this if elected and everyone knows this.

First off, Trumps chances are slim to none to even win this election. So his ability to roll back civil rights is pretty much hypothetical. Start off with his slogan "Make America Great Again".

That slogan was first coined by David Duke a former leader of white supremacist KKK and now wannabe politician who spouts white supremacist rhetoric that is even more extreme than simply a return to segregation and Jim Crow. Duke and the cadre of white supremacist leaders are ecstatic about Trump and his validation of white racist beliefs.

They believe he can damage progress made by the civil rights movement. And Trump's followers eat that shit up. Can he demolish the Civil Rights Act first day in office? No. Can he begin by executive orders to the enforcement branches of government that he would head? Absolutely. Can he help southern states roll back the Voting Rights Act, which is already in shreds after some key Supreme Court rulings that were dominated by right wing justices? Absolutely.

So, would Jim Crow return? Not right away and not in its original form. But rolling back the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act is what he's promising to do.

 

[Fogdog]

Clinton is a warmonger and will do literally anything to take control which has become blatantly obvious throughout this election.

Imagine what she will do if she actually got that power?

Its would be a shitstorm!

Clinton is definitely more hawkish than Obama who tended towards non-intervention, at least as far as using US troops in foreign conflicts. That said, in her speeches during this campaign, she's shown no inclination to the kind of wars that the Bush administration embraced. In 2004, Senator Clinton voted to support Bush and Rumsfeld's war. A few years later, she admits she made a mistake. I'm not comfortable with this. It's not a deal breaker to me but anybody who wants to criticize her for this are welcome to do so.

Are you suggesting Clinton would take over the US government as a dictator? Come on man!

Is Clinton the absolute best candidate ever? I think she's enormously qualified for the job. I'm not completely in line with her stances on the environment, use of military power in international affairs and her cozy ties to Wall Street lobbyists. So, I don't think she's the best candidate ever.

Is she a dictator in waiting? I don't think so.

Would she start a new war like Bush did? I don't think so.

Is she going to raise taxes on the wealthy in order to pay for some of her more progressive initiative? I think so.

Will she try to get the Citizens United ruling rolled back by working with Congress to pass an amendment or by appointing 2 or 3 Supreme Court Justices and shifting the balance of power in the SCOTUS? I think so.

Is she the better choice compared to Trump? Absolutely, this I believe to be true.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm not arguing FOR what a racist does.

except for the fact that you said it would be "polite and reasonable" to hang a sign that says "no negroes allowed".

 

[UncleBuck]

Lol there are certain processes that each law change would have to undergo which wouldnt have a chance if it affects people because of their race or colour.

Your clearly all afraid of what trump will do but do you really think he could take us back to the 50s?

If you actually believe that then your obviously dillusional.

harrekin. not bluntmassa.

 

[Ry16]

Clinton is definitely more hawkish than Obama who tended towards non-intervention, at least as far as using US troops in foreign conflicts. That said, in her speeches during this campaign, she's shown no inclination to the kind of wars that the Bush administration embraced. In 2004, Senator Clinton voted to support Bush and Rumsfeld's war. A few years later, she admits she made a mistake. I'm not comfortable with this. It's not a deal breaker to me but anybody who wants to criticize her for this are welcome to do so.

Are you suggesting Clinton would take over the US government as a dictator? Come on man!

Is Clinton the absolute best candidate ever? I think she's enormously qualified for the job. I'm not completely in line with her stances on the environment, use of military power in international affairs and her cozy ties to Wall Street lobbyists. So, I don't think she's the best candidate ever.

Is she a dictator in waiting? I don't think so.

Would she start a new war like Bush did? I don't think so.

Is she going to raise taxes on the wealthy in order to pay for some of her more progressive initiative? I think so.

Will she try to get the Citizens United ruling rolled back by working with Congress to pass an amendment or by appointing 2 or 3 Supreme Court Justices and shifting the balance of power in the SCOTUS? I think so.

Is she the better choice compared to Trump? Absolutely, this I believe to be true.

In the classified emails exposed she stated she wanted to put a ring of missiles around China...

 

[Big_Lou]

harrekin. not bluntmassa.

(Jots down small liner note.)

They are VERY similar in scumminess, to be fair.

 

[UncleBuck]

(Jots down small liner note.)

They are VERY similar in scumminess, to be fair.

i'm also leaving open the possibility that it might be a 6ohmax/yessica shared account too.

 

[Ry16]

harrekin. not bluntmassa.

Your obviously in need of mental rehabilitation if you think that I am either of those people and its clear your very upset that what I'm stating is factual.

To be honest its people like yourself that actually cause tension between people with different sexual views.

You have the same rights as hetro or bi people so get over it..

 

[Ry16]

i'm also leaving open the possibility that it might be a 6ohmax/yessica shared account too.

Clearly London fog and FogDog are the same person and I wouldnt be surprised if they were both you lol such a pathetic waste of life...

 

[Ry16]

(Jots down small liner note.)

They are VERY similar in scumminess, to be fair.

To be honest since you got rights you obviously think your better than the rest of us.

Which obviously your not...

Shame!

 

[Big_Lou]

Your obviously in need of mental rehabilitation if you think that I am either of those people and its clear your very upset that what I'm stating is factual.

To be honest its people like yourself that actually cause tension between people with different sexual views.

You have the same rights as hetro or bi people so get over it..

Clearly London fog and FogDog are the same person and I wouldnt be surprised if they were both you lol such a pathetic waste of life...

Wanton sock rage!!

 

[Ry16]

Wanton sock rage!!

Lol if you think stating the facts is raging then you need behavioural therapy

 

[Big_Lou]

just a point to this so called admin potroast you think because people are from another country they don't know shit about american politics just go's to show how and I assume you are american, dumb you yanks can be [explains trump popularity] no offence to right thinking yanks IE. anyone who thinks trump is a fuckbag so you can go fuck yourself you hippie fuck potroast bann me you puissant.

LOL!

Man, I'm gonna need a LOT of popcorn for later!

I'd better hit the showers and get ready!

 

[Fogdog]

In the classified emails exposed she stated she wanted to put a ring of missiles around China...

Oh really. So, e-mails. Not her policy speeches, not what she has been putting forward in her site stating what she'd do if she were president but e-mails. In what context? While in State Dept, I guess. Did she actually say this in an e-mail or was it one of the many hopeless and useless people that I've unfortunately learned too much about in this so-called scandal. .

I'm not interested in searching and reading those e-mails. The ones I have read are banal and never actually say what is claimed. So, if you really think Clinton is going to ring fence China with missiles -- this would require Russia's cooperation, as well as Burma, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Mongolia and other countries, then by all means, post the information and show us all how much you know.

How about if we start calling the wikileaks "scandal" something that is more descriptive of what it actually is, how about calling it a spamdal.