Bad Girl With A Gun..

londonfog

Well-Known Member
This is indeed tragic but I'm wondering why in the heck he would walk back to his door and reach into his truck. It's a shame we don't have access to the full audio feed but I could never imagine the officers saying "with your hands up please mosey on back over to your door and grab some ID through your window".

@schuylaar why would you consider this "the litmus if there ever was one"?

Just 2 minutes worth of digging reveals that at one point during his lifelong criminal career we have this incident, which was before the 4 your prison stint he recently served for trafficking:

"Records obtained by The Associated Press on Tuesday show that when Crutcher was ordered to exit the vehicle for a pat-down search, he began making a movement to his right ankle before an officer managed to get control of Crutcher. A .25-caliber pistol was found in his right sock, the arresting officer wrote in an affidavit."

Src: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-tulsa-police-shooting-20160921-story.html
WTF does a 1995 case have to do with 2016.
How can you reach in a window when it is rolled up ?
Keep making excuses for these unfit police.
 

slow_grow

Well-Known Member
WTF does a 1995 case have to do with 2016.
How can you reach in a window when it is rolled up ?
Keep making excuses for these unfit police.

Ahhh didn't catch the window being rolled up. I stand corrected and thanks for pointing that out, totally changes my view on the situation. I honestly thought he was tazed and then decided it would be a good idea to start rummaging through his truck.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
This is indeed tragic but I'm wondering why in the heck he would walk back to his door and reach into his truck.
Too bad they killed him or they could have asked him about Aleppo too.


I just read the rest of your post... Are you fucking serious? Are you really rooting around in this guy's record to see if the police were justified in gunning him down?

Go shoot yourself. I suspect you are breaking the law in some way and should die.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
This is indeed tragic but I'm wondering why in the heck he would walk back to his door and reach into his truck. It's a shame we don't have access to the full audio feed but I could never imagine the officers saying "with your hands up please mosey on back over to your door and grab some ID through your window".

@schuylaar why would you consider this "the litmus if there ever was one"?

Just 2 minutes worth of digging reveals that at one point during his lifelong criminal career we have this incident, which was before the 4 your prison stint he recently served for trafficking:

"Records obtained by The Associated Press on Tuesday show that when Crutcher was ordered to exit the vehicle for a pat-down search, he began making a movement to his right ankle before an officer managed to get control of Crutcher. A .25-caliber pistol was found in his right sock, the arresting officer wrote in an affidavit."

Src: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-tulsa-police-shooting-20160921-story.html
You aren't really doing this, are you? Playing devil's advocate/apologist for yet another unmerited PUBLIC EXECUTION of an INNOCENT MAN?
 

slow_grow

Well-Known Member
You aren't really doing this, are you? Playing devil's advocate/apologist for yet another unmerited PUBLIC EXECUTION of an INNOCENT MAN?
As I mentioned above, I mistakenly thought he was rooting around his truck post taze after deciding to head back to the truck in the first place. Even with that understanding I felt it was over the top but my point was that maybe it shouldn't be lumped into the assassination bucket. Now that I know the window was down, yeah this was murder to be certain...
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
As I mentioned above, I mistakenly thought he was rooting around his truck post taze after deciding to head back to the truck in the first place. Even with that understanding I felt it was over the top but my point was that maybe it shouldn't be lumped into the assassination bucket. Now that I know the window was down, yeah this was murder to be certain...
What about the rest of your post? Why is his 1995 arrest being brought up? Did the police know who he was? Did they look up his 21 year old arrest?

Why is your avi a T-34-85?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
He has a point. I did some digging and found that the perp once cheated on his girlfriend junior year of high school. Good riddance mother fucker. He was a bad skittle. Now the bowl is safer for us all.
My dogs killed my neighbors cat that came into my back yard. I buried the remains and kept silent. I guess I will now be shot to death for my crime. I did however help get them a puppy months later.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
As I mentioned above, I mistakenly thought he was rooting around his truck post taze after deciding to head back to the truck in the first place. Even with that understanding I felt it was over the top but my point was that maybe it shouldn't be lumped into the assassination bucket. Now that I know the window was down, yeah this was murder to be certain...
you mean the window was UP
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Guy's got four kids.... :(
>:(

Prison for life/public executions for all pigs involved. Case closed. These monsters aren't going to stop unless examples are made. And the 'inadequate police training'/inexperience argument is pure bullshit.
 

slow_grow

Well-Known Member
What about the rest of your post? Why is his 1995 arrest being brought up? Did the police know who he was? Did they look up his 21 year old arrest?

Why is your avi a T-34-85?
I mentioned the arrest because I was wondering what in the hell was in the cops minds when approaching him guns armed like that in the first place. His arrest entails him reaching for a weapon in a previous incident, how can that not be applicable regardless if it was the day before or years ago?

The following factors led to my initial opinion:

1. Guy has reached for a weapon in the past with police.
2. Guy disobeys orders (unless by some otherworldly reason the police say "ok sir walk back to your truck").
3. Guy reaches into truck after being tazed.
4. Forum member claims this to be the litmus test if there ever was one.

The only factor that led me to believe that this might not be be the best candidate for the "litmus test" is item 3. Now knowing that was wrong changes everything man.

Lastly, I dig world of tanks.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Why was the guy rolling it up? That certainly would have terrified me.

What if Hitlery poisoned the officer with a drone-fired dart and it caused her finger to spasm?

You tell me!

Milo is so fab.
No he was not rolling the window up. It was already up which make the police a lying POS, when they said he was reaching inside the car window. Bitch police was to ready to pull that trigger to quickly
 

slow_grow

Well-Known Member
Bitch police was to ready to pull that trigger to quickly
For sure. You can see the glare & reflection from the glass in the video pretty easily. My attention was drawn to his body which is why I didn't even notice the window being up at first.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
No he was not rolling the window up. It was already up which make the police a lying POS, when they said he was reaching inside the car window. Bitch police was to ready to pull that trigger to quickly
Seems to me that there is a lot of controversy over his actions regarding the window. You really have to believe the police when the facts are in dispute. They have training.

(you realize I am being ironic about all this)
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Bitch police was to ready to pull that trigger to quickly
As always. The sort of hateful/bullied/fearful/cowardice/racist filth that desires to join 'law enforcement' in the first place.

Watch the video, people, if you can stomach it (I barely could, looking away seconds before the beasts slaughtered the father of four)....it depicts a blatant execution.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
I mentioned the arrest because I was wondering what in the hell was in the cops minds when approaching him guns armed like that in the first place. His arrest entails him reaching for a weapon in a previous incident, how can that not be applicable regardless if it was the day before or years ago?

The following factors led to my initial opinion:

1. Guy has reached for a weapon in the past with police.
2. Guy disobeys orders (unless by some otherworldly reason the police say "ok sir walk back to your truck").
3. Guy reaches into truck after being tazed.
4. Forum member claims this to be the litmus test if there ever was one.

The only factor that led me to believe that this might not be be the best candidate for the "litmus test" is item 3. Now knowing that was wrong changes everything man.

Lastly, I dig world of tanks.
1. So what? Did they know this? How did it enter into the action?
2. He did? Where?
3. Derp
4. Forum members here say some fucked up shit. And you thought that was worth responding to?

Lastly. That was a great tank. It really helped you guys beat the nazis.
 
Top