Voter ID Laws

OMG you enter into a conversation not knowing shit.
Texas for one wanted to except CCW but denied student ID. They also issue CCW to non citizens

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/rsd/chl/faqs/index.htm
scroll down to question 12.

Also you can actually join the military without being a citizen. Guess what you can use that same ID to get a CCW.
So the question still remains.
Why did Voter ID law want to accept CCW permit but not student ID ?
You can be angry or have a calm discussion. You expect people to know what you know? How about sharing instead of being grouchy.

I'm being perfectly respectful towards you.

I don't expect you to do all the work, I provided a bit of info too. I expect others will jump in with sources as well.

Take a smoke break. I will read your links and get back to you.
 
You can be angry or have a calm discussion. You expect people to know what you know? How about sharing instead of being grouchy.

I'm being perfectly respectful towards you.

I don't expect you to do all the work, I provided a bit of info too. I expect others will jump in with sources as well.

Take a smoke break. I will read your links and get back to you.
angry is not the emotion I would describe for me. I do have a low- tolerance for stupidity that can be avoided
I stated before people that support Trump are a special case with me...even if they are Trolls.
You support Trump and Voter ID laws
 
angry is not the emotion I would describe for me. I do have a low- tolerance for stupidity that can be avoided
I stated before people that support Trump are a special case with me...even if they are Trolls.
You support Trump and Voter ID laws
I support trump but I am currently making up my mind about voter id laws.

Quit assuming.
 
I'm being perfectly respectful towards you.

you're standing side by side with avowed white supremacists like desert dude and muyloco to defend a law that was written specifically to disenfranchise black voters like londonfog "with surgical precision".

how you can claim that you are being respectful to him while defending a position that makes it harder for him to have his constitutional right to vote be honored is beyond me.

it reminds me of when the holocaust deniers get angry at me for berating them and they ask why we can't just have a civil discussion about how my family members are lying about being systematically eliminated by a jew-hating madman.
 
you're standing side by side with avowed white supremacists like desert dude and muyloco to defend a law that was written specifically to disenfranchise black voters like londonfog "with surgical precision".

how you can claim that you are being respectful to him while defending a position that makes it harder for him to have his constitutional right to vote be honored is beyond me.

it reminds me of when the holocaust deniers get angry at me for berating them and they ask why we can't just have a civil discussion about how my family members are lying about being systematically eliminated by a jew-hating madman.
Troll
 

i only wish.

my comment was completely on topic, was dispassionate in its analysis, and condemned you for very valid reasons.

compare that with what an internet troll actually does:

In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1]extraneous, or off-topicmessages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion,[3] often for their own amusement.


if anyone fits that definition right now, it is you. you are the one telling a black member not to be upset that you are supporting a law written with the intent to disenfranchise voters like him "with surgical precision".

if i did want to troll you, i would say something like "well, you are a woman, and women really have no place in politics, so stick to what you know best, like cooking shitty food that you bought with food stamps or sucking your husband's dick to make him feel better about the fact that he cannot provide for his family without government assistance".

now that would be a troll.
 
OMG you enter into a conversation not knowing shit.
Texas for one wanted to except CCW but denied student ID. They also issue CCW to non citizens

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/rsd/chl/faqs/index.htm
scroll down to question 12.

Also you can actually join the military without being a citizen. Guess what you can use that same ID to get a CCW.
So the question still remains.
Why did Voter ID law want to accept CCW permit but not student ID ?

It's quite simple, CCW permits and military IDs are issued by the government. Student IDs are issued by liberal douchebag businesses/institutions that are operated and administered by liberal douchebags known to bend or break any law to further their agenda. Ends justifies the means, doesn't buy you much credibility.
 
It's quite simple, CCW permits and military IDs are issued by the government. Student IDs are issued by liberal douchebag businesses/institutions that are operated and administered by liberal douchebags known to bend or break any law to further their agenda. Ends justifies the means, doesn't buy you much credibility.

an avowed white supremacist who is throwing his full-throated support behind a bill designed to disenfranchise black voters "with surgical precision" is accusing other people of having an "agenda".

and that agenda is to allow people their constitutional right to vote.

not only that, but he is saying that the government is the only one we can trust to issue IDs while simultaneously accusing the federal judges appointed by that government of not being trustworthy in determining what a fair law is in regards to which IDs may count.

yeah, i'd hate myself just as much as muyloco does if i had to contort logic in such a way as to actually try to justify such blatant hypocrisy.
 
It's quite simple, CCW permits and military IDs are issued by the government. Student IDs are issued by liberal douchebag businesses/institutions that are operated and administered by liberal douchebags known to bend or break any law to further their agenda. Ends justifies the means, doesn't buy you much credibility.
WTF. You do realize you have public and private universities. Public founded and operated by state government . Private university is what you are TRYING to describe.
 
an avowed white supremacist who is throwing his full-throated support behind a bill designed to disenfranchise black voters "with surgical precision" is accusing other people of having an "agenda".

and that agenda is to allow people their constitutional right to vote.

not only that, but he is saying that the government is the only one we can trust to issue IDs while simultaneously accusing the federal judges appointed by that government of not being trustworthy in determining what a fair law is in regards to which IDs may count.

yeah, i'd hate myself just as much as muyloco does if i had to contort logic in such a way as to actually try to justify such blatant hypocrisy.
He also does not understand how universities are funded and operated. I guess he wouldn't know if he didn't attend.
 
an avowed white supremacist who is throwing his full-throated support behind a bill designed to disenfranchise black voters "with surgical precision" is accusing other people of having an "agenda".

and that agenda is to allow people their constitutional right to vote.

not only that, but he is saying that the government is the only one we can trust to issue IDs while simultaneously accusing the federal judges appointed by that government of not being trustworthy in determining what a fair law is in regards to which IDs may count.

yeah, i'd hate myself just as much as muyloco does if i had to contort logic in such a way as to actually try to justify such blatant hypocrisy.

Remember muylocofordick is black. Yeah right.
 
you're standing side by side with avowed white supremacists like desert dude and muyloco to defend a law that was written specifically to disenfranchise black voters like londonfog "with surgical precision".

how you can claim that you are being respectful to him while defending a position that makes it harder for him to have his constitutional right to vote be honored is beyond me.

it reminds me of when the holocaust deniers get angry at me for berating them and they ask why we can't just have a civil discussion about how my family members are lying about being systematically eliminated by a jew-hating madman.


London`s too poor to vote ? He`s diving in the Islands somewhere in the S. Pacific.

The law does no such thing as you claim buck. "With surgical precision" should be pretty easy stuff to explain and prove.
 
London`s too poor to vote ? He`s diving in the Islands somewhere in the S. Pacific.

meanwhile, you are too white trash and poor to afford a plane ticket to go fight ISIS.

broke ass pussy.

The law does no such thing as you claim buck.

not my claim. just repeating what a panel of bipartisan federal judges said.

"With surgical precision" should be pretty easy stuff to explain and prove.

it already has been proven and explained to the satisfaction of the supreme court.

but that bunch of harvard graduates has nothing on a lying, jew hating, racist little internet pussy like yourself, eh?

retard.
 
meanwhile, you are too white trash and poor to afford a plane ticket to go fight ISIS.

broke ass pussy.



not my claim. just repeating what a panel of bipartisan federal judges said.



it already has been proven and explained to the satisfaction of the supreme court.

but that bunch of harvard graduates has nothing on a lying, jew hating, racist little internet pussy like yourself, eh?

retard.

1) I`ll get a free boat, no ship ride. I don`t do boats.

2) So was Marijuana Prohibition. We both know how that went.

3) I will be and so will my grandkids before I get done paying for that damn race car.
 
meanwhile, you are too white trash and poor to afford a plane ticket to go fight ISIS.

broke ass pussy.



not my claim. just repeating what a panel of bipartisan federal judges said.



it already has been proven and explained to the satisfaction of the supreme court.

but that bunch of harvard graduates has nothing on a lying, jew hating, racist little internet pussy like yourself, eh?

retard.


With my best Adrian voice,.....You can`t explain...............
 
Out for 218,000,000 eligible voters in the US, there are 1,500,000 deceased people lurking on the county voter registration rolls. You are worried about the possibility of a fraction of 0.7% voter fraud. But that level is never realized. It's more like 0.007%.

Ok, Dude, so clean up the voter rolls. Go through every county in this nation and scrub every one of the people who no longer are in the area and the very, very few people who are deceased and still on the rolls. It's not worth the effort but yeah, you are correct there is some error on voter rolls in every county. Those tax dollars you whine about would be mis-spent doing this, because there is no fraud at a significant level taking place. So there is that.

You are weak with numbers, that is clear. I won't deny the possibility that there is a fraction of a percent of fraud. And neither do the people who run elections, which is why, when an election comes down to 0.5% to 1% of margin, there is an automatic recount. Other than automatic recounts, any candidate can request a recount. During a recount, the kind of fraud you fear is ferreted out and those votes are rejected.

So you are all in a tizzy about a non-problem. Trump would lose by 5 to 10 percent if an election were to be held today. Find something else to cry about.

What is significant are Republican measures to prevent minorities from voting. Forcing somebody who is making poverty wages to take time off work to visit a DMV might not seem significant to a retired comparatively wealthy person like you but you aren't the target of anti-democratic Republicans. A visit to a DMV can cost a whole day of wages to somebody just barely getting by. And for what? There has never been a problem that would be solved by this, other than the problem of darkies voting for their choice of candidate.

Fraud that you should worry about are the restrictions at the polls. Faulty equipment, shortages of equipment or few polling stations located far apart, these all cause tens of thousands of people to be dis-enfranchised. Also, private organizations have been going through voter rolls and thousands in Florida were scrubbed from rolls that should not have been. It just so happens that most were African American. If you worried about these anti-democratic acts as well as your phony walking dead voter, then you would have a little credibility.

It is well documented and verified as fact that Republicans are anti-democratic. They have taken actions to deny the vote to people in the tens of thousands. This is the real fraud going on in the US today. Not that you care.

That's not what's bothering you, is it? What's bothering you is the very real chance that a black man will be handing the presidency over to a woman and both represent the Democratic Party. Oh the humanity! (snicker)
The 0.007% figure is for CONVICTIONS, in a field where prosecution is almost impossible to prosecute without voter ID. Your whole argument is a lie. And, of course, you add the typical argument used by the political wing of the Klan, "disagree with me and you are a racist!"
 
OMG you enter into a conversation not knowing shit.
Texas for one wanted to except CCW but denied student ID. They also issue CCW to non citizens

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/rsd/chl/faqs/index.htm
scroll down to question 12.

Also you can actually join the military without being a citizen. Guess what you can use that same ID to get a CCW.
So the question still remains.
Why did Voter ID law want to accept CCW permit but not student ID ?
Student ID requires no actual proof of identity.
 
poor stupid red.

claims that there were more votes than registered voters, gets shown the exact number of votes and registered voters from all of those counties which can be verified by those counties, and labels it "shitpiles of democratic lies".

claims MSNBC never covered the new blck panther, gets shown an article from MSNBC covering just that, and has no comeback whatsoever.

poor, impotent red. red1966 the racist shitpile. the one who says that "blacks are more inclined to criminality" then denies that he said it despite me reproducing his exact quote. then cries when i call him a racist for his racist remarks.

poor, stupid red.

don't burn your family alive, again.
You quote me, but address your vitriol to someone else. Not sure how to respond. I did, however look up your "quote", surprise!!! It was edited to say the exact opposite of what it actually said.
Did not say what you claim about MSNBC. Surprise!!! Another lie.
Your whole debating style seems to be misquotes, lies, and false accusations.
That you stoop to such shenanigans shows you are evil. Evil people promote evil causes. And evil candidates.
 
You quote me, but address your vitriol to someone else. Not sure how to respond. I did, however look up your "quote", surprise!!! It was edited to say the exact opposite of what it actually said.
Did not say what you claim about MSNBC. Surprise!!! Another lie.
Your whole debating style seems to be misquotes, lies, and false accusations.
That you stoop to such shenanigans shows you are evil. Evil people promote evil causes. And evil candidates.

Take that shit back to church Mr Anderson
 
Just to clarify, I think voter ID is a good idea but either needs to be issued free or any form of photographic Govt issued ID be accepted.

It's common sense that people use ID to vote and I don't care what it costs to give one to everyone, benefit of citizenship I suppose.
 
Back
Top