You're listing subjective reasons, I'm asking for objective reasons and I know you're smart enough to understand the difference, and I know you know exactly what I'm asking you, you just refuse to answer it honestly because it would show that your argument that people are not swayed by media manipulation is total bullshit. The princeton study I posted earlier also proves that argument is total bullshit.
Dude, people make up their minds for many reasons. I'm saying that 31% of Democratic Party members did not just up and change their mind due to a debate question or due to some collusion with Politico or some six-month period where the media favored Hillary when the evidence is that Hillary received negative treatment compared to Bernie. Not saying it's everything Hillary has done or the DNC did is OK, just saying you are all worked up over a morality issue that and not an actual cause for Bernie's losses.
Of course I refuse to go down the path of objective reasons why people make up their minds. Inherent to the human decision making is subjectivity.
My discussion with Pie is an example of how subjective the whole process is. While I don't treat her very well, I've never claimed she was less able to make a decision. My differences with her lies in our differences regarding values, her belief that Hillary is some sort of criminal based upon years of right wing propaganda, her ignorance and fear of Muslims and desire for an authoritarian leader. We differ greatly on that. But I don't claim she's inferior because she chose Trump. That is where you and I disagree.
I didn't read that princeton study. I'll go back and find it, read or at least scan it and see if it is germane to this discussion.
