Not here to spoonfeed you pics, try to understand the meaning of those words and you can make pics yourself. Or better yet, combine those words with many other sources and make a more informed decision.
so are u suggesting to use less blue?
View attachment 3716328
you likey?
Obviously less blue equates to more of another color so there's a little more to it. Not entirely what I pictured with words but for flowering, I do "likey"-ish. It's a bit low on blue lol... How about some royal blue
Greengenes' looks much better than 3500k and I like it more than the Cree ref spectrum too. In that one I would prefer to remove some of the 510-560 region and spend that on 630-660 instead which would relative drop the blue a little and bump the red a little if possible/practical and not with a major efficiency loss.
Ok, fine, with a disclaimer... don't pretend this suggests I suggest the ideal spectrum for cannabis. This would come closer to the what I had in mind with my words.
144 xpe warm white (2700-3700k), 48 photo red
Want more blue, replace one photo red per engine with white..
Cri 95, R9 96
More pics lol
Like I said in the first post, either more red leds or warmer whites with higher red. It appears that the latter is an easy way to go about it. Anything lower than 4000K, but same W:R. Obviously something similar, and certainly similar enough, can be achieved with different variations, but you obviously want a somewhat even spread per engine and per the entire light. If you can get a lot more efficient red (630) than photo red I would use those too.
For example, per engine with 16 leds, 3 photo red, 2 red, 2 cool white, 5 warm white... Edit: make that a 12 led engine lol, you get the point, or not...
The advantage over using white only is obviously the more granular control than picking spectrum based on K temp alone, yet the more different colors you use the less the uniformity of the spectrum across the entire canopy will be compared to white and photo red alone.