Another Family ruined over a lil bud and "citizen forfeiture

[UncleBuck]

rapist

there you go again.

trying to say that if you cannot deny services to people based on their skin color, you are being raped.

sorry, but once again words have meanings.

you really should kill yourself.

 

[Rob Roy]

i'm not familiar with any location anywhere that this hypothetical exists.

perhaps you can give us a real world example of where this is happening.

has someone been forced to open up a store that serves the public? if so, name the store and where it is.

until you can actually do this, go ahead and shitcan your non-existent hypothetical and get back to telling us how it might not be racist to deny service to someone based on their skin color.

So, who owns the property is the question you avoid.

If YOU own something, what does that mean ?

 

[Big_Lou]

Who OWNS the property is the question you are avoiding.

A racist can own property, no? How does the racist violate another person if they REMAIN on their own property ?

Cut through the bullshit and semantics, pal....c'mon....

 

[UncleBuck]

So, who owns the property is the question you avoid.

If YOU own something, what does that mean ?

i asked you to give me a real life example of your hypothetical. you can't.

like always.

 

[Rob Roy]

there you go again.

trying to say that if you cannot deny services to people based on their skin color, you are being raped.

sorry, but once again words have meanings.

you really should kill yourself.

Should I control your property or should you ?

We both agree a racist has no right to go to another persons property and use offensive force. Yet, you think other people can go to a racists property and use offensive force, like a rapist does when he creates a forcible human interaction.

 

[UncleBuck]

rapist

you don't know what words mean. you are senile, confused, and racist. you really should kill yourself.

 

[Rob Roy]

Cut through the bullshit and semantics, pal....c'mon....

View attachment 3712062

Nope.

I disagree with how a racist runs his property.

Of course I think fat people should eat better and treat their "property" (their body) better, but I sure wouldn't force them to get up in the morning and go work out with me if they preferred not to interact wth me..

 

[UncleBuck]

Nope.

yep.

you are a racist.

 

[skunkwreck]

The primary question isn't how much or how little money you should be "allowed" to have, it should be, why is it anyone's business to intervene in your life in the first place?

If you did not create a real victim, you were probably falsely charged.

Well I did get caught with 395 pounds also so that may have been a factor .

 

[Fogdog]

Well I did get caught with 395 pounds also so that may have been a factor .

Think so? Your money was innocent..

Footage from the court appearance?

 

[Rob Roy]

i consider denying service to someone based on their skin color to be an offensive aggressive and racist act.

don't you?

or do you not know what words mean?

You can't be using offensive force if you are the one seeking to not interact, Uncle Bonehead.

 

[UncleBuck]

You can't be using offensive force if you are the one seeking to not interact, Uncle Bonehead.

so a guy has a store and is selling food and medicine to people that offer him money. he does this all day without a problem, then a black customer walks in and offers the store owner money in exchange for food and medicine, just the same as everyone else did that day.

the store owner stops what he is doing, calls him a racial slur, and tells him to get out of his store or else and then reaches for a gun.

you're saying that is not offensive force he is using to enforce the racial segregation that you think should be legal?

learn what words mean you retarded klanman.

 

[Rob Roy]

i asked you to give me a real life example of your hypothetical. you can't.

like always.

Wa

so a guy has a store and is selling food and medicine to people that offer him money. he does this all day without a problem, then a black customer walks in and offers the store owner money in exchange for food and medicine, just the same as everyone else did that day.

the store owner stops what he is doing, calls him a racial slur, and tells him to get out of his store or else and then reaches for a gun.

you're saying that is not offensive force he is using to enforce the racial segregation that you think should be legal?

learn what words mean you retarded klanman.

That guy sure sounds like a douche bag. I sure wouldn't run my business or my property that way. I wouldn't think of trying to run the douche bags business for him though, that would make me a douche bag too.

We both dislike the douche bag. Except you think your dislike for him creates a right for you to act like YOU own his property. How does that happen ?


You also believe it is okay to force another person to interact with you and that going to their property and forcing an interaction is okay for you to do.

Why do you insist forcing one person to serve another on an involuntary basis isn't at least a partial form of slavery, slave?

 

[UncleBuck]

slavery

you are just demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what words mean.

 

[Rob Roy]

you are just demonstrating that you have no fucking clue what words mean.

You are demonstrating that your words have failed you and you cannot rebut what I said.





I win (again).

 

[UncleBuck]

You are demonstrating that your words have failed you and you cannot rebut what I said.





I win (again).

View attachment 3712323

in order for that to be true, owning a store and being unable to refuse service to black people would be the same thing as slavery, and it is not.

like i said, you simply have no idea what words mean.

but keep proclaiming victory. i'm sure that makes you feel a whole lot better.

 

[Rob Roy]

in order for that to be true, owning a store and being unable to refuse service to black people would be the same thing as slavery, and it is not.

like i said, you simply have no idea what words mean.

but keep proclaiming victory. i'm sure that makes you feel a whole lot better.

Making a person serve you who would prefer not to is a form of creating involuntary servitude, with force as your means.

Do you need a map the rest of the way there or can you figure it out now, dunce?

Here, this is for you...

 

[UncleBuck]

Making a person serve you who would prefer not to is a form of creating involuntary servitude

alright, so you've already walked back the slavery wording. you're still fucking retarded though.

every store owner can be open to the public or open only to private customers. so what you are describing is not even possible and does not exist. just like that other imaginary hypothetical you pulled out in a weak and feeble attempt to justify your love of racial segregation and white supremacy.

learn what words mean you dumb klanman.

 

[ttystikk]

They took my money and then received a letter saying the state of Texas vs. U.S. currency.

State sanctioned theft of your assets, completely contravening your constitutional right to protection from search and seizure without due process.

Pot is victimless. Therefore we must take away all of your rights.

 

[Rob Roy]

alright, so you've already walked back the slavery wording. you're still fucking retarded though.

every store owner can be open to the public or open only to private customers. so what you are describing is not even possible and does not exist. just like that other imaginary hypothetical you pulled out in a weak and feeble attempt to justify your love of racial segregation and white supremacy.

learn what words mean you dumb klanman.

You are squirrel hunting in the pond.

The relevant issue is a property rights issue, not the history of the legal machinations which changed the meaning of private property to something less than private property.

Private property is redundant. Public property is an oxymoron. - some famous guy whose name I've forgotten