Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mellowman2112 said:
The end of intelligent conversation has arrived officially with UB's entry.
Click to expand...

us jews are like that.

dumb enough to murder a conversation about how the world is secretly flat, yet smart enough to control that flat world and all the major institutions on it, all while convincing the sheeple that it is round.

and seriously, have you tried our potato pancakes?
 
Mellowman2112 said:
What you are describing is density. So if you are correct, a 777 should have to have X times the engine power of a 737 in order to defeat this magical force called gravity.

I'm in a search for the truth, I found this, which doesn't help my argument but for sciences sake here it is.

The standard CFM56-3 jet engines on a 737-500 generate 18,500 pounds of thrust; x 2= 37000 pounds of thrust
takeoff Weight, 52.390 kg

777 Boeing 777-300ER = 775,000 lb (350,678 kg) engine thrust--It is powered by the GE90-115Bturbofan, the most powerful jet engine with a maximum thrust of 115,300 lbf (513 kN). x 2 230,000 lbs of thrust.

The 777 is seven times heavier its engines should have to have much more than 7 times the power of the 737

Due to the much larger mass yet the numbers don't show this to be the case.
Click to expand...

Complete fail as an aeronautical engineer. Go back to fixing sandwiches at Subway.
 
cannabineer said:
The physics are established and have been described to a fare-thee-well. Most propellers spin MUCH faster than 1 rev/day. Until you sort out all the deceptive little premise riddles.
Click to expand...

Good one, but it's still moving at over a thousand miles an hour. Why is that flight times from LA to NY and vice versa are almost identical if this is the case?
 
UncleBuck said:
us jews are like that.

dumb enough to murder a conversation about how the world is secretly flat, yet smart enough to control that flat world and all the major institutions on it, all while convincing the sheeple that it is round.

and seriously, have you tried our potato pancakes?
Click to expand...

...and those matzo balls, you're totally taking over the world with those!
 
giphy.gif
 
cannabineer said:
1) what hot spot?
2)The hash marks are aligned; the camera was tilted relative to the lunar plane

I see nothing in the image that says "fake".
Click to expand...
Sorry you can't see the hotspot. As far as the cameras go they were mounted to the astronauts chest so he would have to be bending at the waist or standing on a noticeable angle.
 
Mellowman2112 said:
What happened to steadieeddie? did you get him banned already? Freedom of speech? thats a myth
Click to expand...
This is a privately hosted website. Your first amendment rights do not apply here nor do they apply in someone's living room. Actually the First Amendment is something you obviously do not have a grasp of either.

Are you actually old enough to even be on this site?
 
tangerinegreen555 said:
If you get hit in the head by a moon rock...

does it still make a sound?
Click to expand...
Evidently all or most of the moon rocks we brought back were stolen. One was tested by an independent group and they said it was petrified wood. The feather that they used in the feather and hammer test is on the moon, I guess they didn't have enough room for a feather because they could only bring back 800 pounds of rocks. What about all the cameras in question? All of them needed to be modified to function on the lunar surface but nobody can check these modifications because they're on the moon. Shouldn't they be in a museum?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top