Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's very simple 11th grade math,
Good math on bad premises is wrong math.
You have no answers so you reply with ''attempting to falsify your ideas.....'' BS This is the flat earth discussion site. Let's get to discussing.
900+ posts of that already ... clever thing that PREV button
You have no idea of my level of education.
I will wager that I can make a very good guess.
 
What if it were two sections of flat earth, intersected?

*I'm not invested into these ideas and am contented that my keyboard is flat.
 
Good math on bad premises is wrong math. 900+ posts of that already ... clever thing that PREV button I will wager that I can make a very good guess.

Yes and nobody has answered any of these questions satisfactorily. In science if the experiment does not prove something the theory is discarded, therefore the ball earth theory should be discarded in favor of another hypothesis. just saying.
 
Yes and nobody has answered any of these questions satisfactorily. In science if the experiment does not prove something the theory is discarded, therefore the ball earth theory should be discarded in favor of another hypothesis. just saying.
Go back to any grade school science book. If you can do the math then take a high school course. It was covered if you weren't under the bleacher smoking or fucking.
 
I can proudly say I have resisted being indoctrinated. Good statist, the first thing you think of is a military response.
I f'n love a man in uniform
starship_troopers_1997.jpg
 
Yes and nobody has answered any of these questions satisfactorily. In science if the experiment does not prove something the theory is discarded, therefore the ball earth theory should be discarded in favor of another hypothesis. just saying.
The adverb is the catch here. Your "satisfactorily" cannot be established by any internally consistent criterion. Judging by the familiar tired "splain me this" brought by the previous vintage of denialists, my "satisfactorily" and yours don't mesh, and I'm not giving mine up tonight.
 
The adverb is the catch here. Your "satisfactorily" cannot be established by any internally consistent criterion. Judging by the familiar tired "splain me this" brought by the previous vintage of denialists, my "satisfactorily" and yours don't mesh, and I'm not giving mine up tonight.

I'm not the one denying the simple math, that Chicago from the other side of Lake Michigan should not be visible as it would be obscurred by a wall of water on a ball earth.
 
Tyler Durden: " --- I was told the earth was flat so it is flat. End of discussion "

Here's an idea, why not read the thread it's entirety, instead of just popping in at the end. You should find the ideas your promote to be addressed and handily dismantled. I hate to break it to you, but now that you've espoused a flat Earth, EVERYONE has a great idea of your level of education...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top