tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
I caught that, too. Not a CGI image, per se, but a conglomerate view. Here is an actual photo...That is a cgi image.
I caught that, too. Not a CGI image, per se, but a conglomerate view. Here is an actual photo...That is a cgi image.
Its fake and cgi. You don't think they thought of that? Look for repeating cloud swirls, the small ones that you don't see at first glance.I caught that, too. Not a CGI image, per se, but a conglomerate view. Here is an actual photo...
The glass is always full even when it's empty.Is the glass half full or half empty?
View attachment 3691377
It's completely full...half with water, half with air. Everyone who disagrees with that can fuck off because that's that.
,I caught that, too. Not a CGI image, per se, but a conglomerate view. Here is an actual photo...
Now turn your head to the side and look at it for a second. Again I'm not saying the earth is flat but you really cant tell from that vantage point. Do it, turn your head to the side and wait just a few seconds for your brain to catch up. Nonetheless You will see the flat plane these individuals are talking about.
It's much more so a planet full of love, relative peace, and beauty. It's a large reason why there are 7 billion of us and climbing...Bottom line, we live on a really ugly planet full of war and hatred.
That's not really how the scientific method works -Everyone that disagrees with us can fuck off because that's that. Part of science is studying every angle regardless if you think it's wrong.
Theory is the highest form of scientific knowledge, and it consists of facts. Theory in the scientific sense is much different than laymen use the term -Theories are just an idea and not fact. I am not saying the world is flat, just opening the topic.
You're grasping at straws and it took you a very long time to respond to that. I don't feel your point directly responds to what I said. All I asked from you was to look at the picture you quoted me, observation is scientific data I agree on that.It's much more so a planet full of love, relative peace, and beauty. It's a large reason why there are 7 billion of us and climbing...
That's not really how the scientific method works -
The scientific method starts with observation. All angles cannot present themselves for observation, since some don't actually exist. The scientific method can be employed to test the veracity of false ideas, and if done correctly the idea will show itself as false.
Theory is the highest form of scientific knowledge, and it consists of facts. Theory in the scientific sense is much different than layman use the term -
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory
Full Definition of theory
plural theories
The sense that science uses the term is highlighted in red. Theory attempts to explain natural phenomena, the phenomena itself is
- 1 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
- 2 : abstract thought : speculation
- 3 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art <music theory>
- 4a : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action <her method is based on the theory that all children want to learn>b : an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances —often used in the phrase in theory <in theory, we have always advocated freedom for all>
- 5 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena <the wave theory of light>
- 6a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigationb : an unproved assumption : conjecturec : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject <theory of equations>
'fact'. I'm not trying to be pedantic, it is important to be specific regarding terms when speaking of the scientific method as opposed to using them in a casual sense. If not, equivocation will rear rear its ugly head...
You think this is a real image?I caught that, too. Not a CGI image, per se, but a conglomerate view. Here is an actual photo...
what happens during a solar eclipse?You think this is a real image?
I agreeIt's much more so a planet full of love,
Let's examine your logic: Neither you nor I are meteorologists or experts at weather patterns. You see patterns in the clouds, i.e. the weather, in the photo I posted. That's not surprising, it is why they are called 'Weather Patterns'. You are using your amateur assessment of cloud formations to provoke doubt that it is an actual photo of the Earth? This does not seem like sound logic or a strong critical thinking process...,
I know it seems a stretch, but look at similarities in different geographical locations regarding the cloud formations. If you look closely you will see repeating formations or copy and paste shit to the layman.
A one in a billion chance. The amazing thing is, it repeats. Is it coincidence? Could it be more perfect?what happens during a solar eclipse?
... but your method seems to start and stop with observation. Have you done more than glance at the photo(s) and deduce that the cloud formations are exactly the same and repeated throughout?All I asked from you was to look at the picture you quoted me, observation is scientific data I agree on that.
I do know about cloud formations, would you like some links? Anyone that studies cloud formations can see the copy and paste. You're not really looking at the picture. I know you have the software to zoom in and take a look. Quit shooting your mouth off and take a look. You will see your picture is a fake. I don't fucking give a rats ass if the earth is flat or round. What I do know is that picture is dr.edLet's examine your logic: Neither you nor I are meteorologists or experts at weather patterns. You see patterns in the clouds, i.e. the weather, in the photo I posted. That's not surprising, it is why they are called 'Weather Patterns'. You are using your amateur assessment of cloud formations to provoke doubt the it is an actual photo of the Earth? This does not seem like sound logic or a strong critical thinking process...
Yes I have.... but your method seems to start and stop with observation. Have you done more than glance at the photo(s) and deduce that the cloud formations are exactly the same and repeated throughout?