EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Bernie has two chances at winning the nomination,
1) slim
2) none

Maybe he will run as an independent but he says he won't.

Elections matter and its time to face up to a Hillary presidency because the GOP has all but given this post to the Democrats. But all is not lost. Perhaps your state could elect Congressmen that would pull the Clinton administration towards the left? Oh that's right, you live in Florida. So, maybe not right now.
He said he wouldn't run independent before many of the facts presented themselves.

New information changes things.

You can still go on believing the world is flat if you wish..
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
He said he wouldn't run independent before many of the facts presented themselves.

New information changes things.

You can still go on believing the world is flat if you wish..
Now, now, a small difference is not something to go ballistic over. I think Bernie won't run as an indie. Just my opinion, which matters not.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I don't know if winner take all is better. I think winner takes all is less democratic. Proportional allocation for democratic delegates now plays to Hillary's favor is more a factor of how well she did early on in the South. The South will probably go Republican in the Fall yet influenced the choice of Hillary for the Democrats. Go figure. But I don't think its crooked, it's just the way it goes. Bernie really didn't start campaigning until last year and was practically unknown to southern voters before then. Hillary, like her or not, has been campaigning to be prez for about 100 years and is pretty well known.

I do think that the super delegates are a remnant of the past and should be eliminated however. Right now, it looks like Hillary is going to win the popular vote outright, so I don't think super delegates are much of an issue. Their votes will pump up Hillary's count at the convention but its just window dressing.
But don't you need everyone to vote before deciding who has the popular vote?

Bernie wins nationally because the polling consists of ALL not just some voters.

Don't underestimate the millions of independents who weren't allowed to vote..we're just waiting for the general to roll around.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
But don't you need everyone to vote before deciding who has the popular vote?

Bernie wins nationally because the polling consists of ALL not just some voters.

Don't underestimate the millions of independents who weren't allowed to vote..we're just waiting for the general to roll around.
Well, in primaries, or at least closed ones like in Oregon, the popular vote for the democratic party candidate consists only of those who registered as democrats before April 26. We don't even have a popular vote for president in the fall. Its all done by the electoral college, which is decided by which candidate wins the most votes by state. As shown in 2000, the president-elect doesn't need a majority in any state or even to win the most popular votes nationwide.

Not that I like all that, but those are the rules until we change them.

Why doesn't Florida have vote by mail?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
But don't you need everyone to vote before deciding who has the popular vote?

Bernie wins nationally because the polling consists of ALL not just some voters.

Don't underestimate the millions of independents who weren't allowed to vote..we're just waiting for the general to roll around.
Sky go take the time to do the math. You making this harder on yourself. DAMN YOU BERNIE for turning a good woman bad and crazy.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I don't think you are being sarcastic..but that's exactly what all these hoops are for.. To discourage people from voting..it should be easy as hell and quick to cast a vote every 4 years.
I wasn't being at all sarcastic; I was labeling the practice for what it is.

And it should be quick and easy to cast a vote during EVERY ballot, because some state and local initiatives can come up as often as every six months.
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Why? Nowhere in the constitution does it say citizen ID is required. Should be able to match against registered voter lists, just like they did when I was younger.
My bad. Just thinking the barcode on it would make it super easy. Forgot about lots of people not having licenses. Lol

I could of sworn i had to show id to vote in 2012tho.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
My bad. Just thinking the barcode on it would make it super easy. Forgot about lots of people not having licenses. Lol

I could of sworn i had to show id to vote in 2012tho.
Requiring a state ID is another subtle form of voter suppression; those who don't have them are much more likely to be poor, minority- and vote Democratic.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I disagree. Everybody should have at least a state ID. It's not that hard to get one and I'm sure everyone can find the time to go to dmv and get one.
Show me where it says in the US Constitution that I have to have an ID to vote, and I'll go along with it.

There's good reason ID requirements aren't in there. It's to keep those who would buy power and influence from using them to create rules and regulations to stifle a citizen's right to vote... just like which is in fact happening left and right around the country.

WTF is it with right wingers who wrap themselves in constitutional rights- and then try to revise the document, anyway? I'll bet you haven't even read the whole thing, or if you have it was back in middle school. That's actually most Americans, so it's a fairly safe bet.
 

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
There are so many things in this country that require ID, it boggles my mind that providing identification is a serious hurdle for anyone. It seems like it would actually be much much harder to live life in America without ID than it would be to acquire one. I just can't think of any valid reason to not have ID.
 
Top