Just in case you thought Israel was a nice country, just misunderstood

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Again, Prager University is to knowledge and education what beefaroni is to quality Italian food

Did you bother actually reading that .pdf from Harvard University, you know, the number one academic institution in the entire world, that says you and Mr. Prager are full of shit? Go check that out, you might learn something
First, there was a post where you seemed to reference something but nothing was attached when I saw it. Bonehead. Is it there now? Second, Alan Dershowitz is a big lefty and also a highly regarded tHarvard Law professor. Who has more cred, leftys touting a lefty cause or a lefty braking from the herd? In any case you watch my videos, I'll read the pdf.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
First, there was a post where you seemed to reference something but nothing was attached when I saw it. Bonehead. Is it there now?
Still there ^^^
Second, Alan Dershowitz is a big lefty and also a highly regarded tHarvard Law professor. Who has more cred, leftys touting a lefty cause or a lefty braking from the herd? In any case you watch my videos, I'll read the pdf.
His views on Israel have been highly criticized by both the faculty at Harvard and the students;

"In his article, Dershowitz called for the organized destruction of a single Palestinian village in retaliation for every terrorist attack against Israel.

“It will be a morally acceptable trade-off even if the property of some innocent civilians must be sacrificed in the process,” Dershowitz wrote.

Second-year law student Najeeb N. Khoury, president of Justice for Palestine, said his group took issue with the article’s proposal.

“By arguing for the arbitrary destruction of Palestinian villages, Dershowitz marginalizes Palestinian lives and perpetuates the cycle of violence,” Khoury said."

-The Harvard Crimson


And here he is losing a debate arguing against the motion "this House believes it's time for the US to get tough on Israel"




 

bravedave

Well-Known Member
Still there ^^^

His views on Israel have been highly criticized by both the faculty at Harvard and the students;

"In his article, Dershowitz called for the organized destruction of a single Palestinian village in retaliation for every terrorist attack against Israel.

“It will be a morally acceptable trade-off even if the property of some innocent civilians must be sacrificed in the process,” Dershowitz wrote.

Second-year law student Najeeb N. Khoury, president of Justice for Palestine, said his group took issue with the article’s proposal.

“By arguing for the arbitrary destruction of Palestinian villages, Dershowitz marginalizes Palestinian lives and perpetuates the cycle of violence,” Khoury said."

-The Harvard Crimson


And here he is losing a debate arguing against the motion "this House believes it's time for the US to get tough on Israel"




Thought you said he lost?
 

bravedave

Well-Known Member


He did lose. 63% of the audience supported the motion that he was arguing against "this House believes it's time for the US to get tough on Israel"
Lol. I listened and formed my own opinion without the help of a bunch 19 year olds with rich parents. AD obviously was in command there and just because he may not have changed any minds doesn't mean he lost the argument.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Report: Germany considering stopping 'unconditional support' of Israel

Der Spiegel reports senior officials in the German government believe Netanyahu is 'instrumentalizing' Berlin's friendship, while the magazine quotes Merkel as saying she understands 'why President Abbas continually seeks out the Security Council.'


"According to Der Spiegel, an evidence of a change in the German Foreign Ministry's attitude towards Israel is the refusal of then-foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier to grant Netayahu's request to raise objections to a document authored by the EU's foreign ministers that criticized the construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

"I'm counting on you," Netanyahu is quoted to have told Steinmeier at the end of his call to the German foreign minister.

Steinmeier, however, ignored the Israeli prime minister's pleas and threw Germany's support of the EU document, which states that "Settlements are illegal under international law, constitute an obstacle to peace and threaten to make a two-state solution impossible."

According to the weekly, this incident points to the weakening influence of Israel's friends within the German Foreign Ministry.

The Chancellery has also reportedly lost hope that Netanyahu would work to advance the peace process.

During a recent visit of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to Berlin, Chancellor Angela Merkel is quoted to have said, "I understand why President Abbas continually seeks out the Security Council."

Meanwhile, Merkel's foreign policy advisor Christoph Heusgen, who is pushing for Germany to distance itself from Israel, is mentioned in the report as a supporter of the EU settlement product labeling policy.

According to Der Spiegel, Netanyahu is solely responsible for the fact Israel's critics within the German government are gaining strength. The weekly makes repeated mentions of Merkel's anger at a report coming out of her recent meeting with Netanyahu in Berlin, according to which the chancellor said that "this isn't the time for a two-state solution."

Israeli officials countered that Merkel made the comments during an official press conference, and that the atmosphere during Netanyahu's last meet with Merkel was very positive.

One senior official in Jerusalem said in response to the report that relations between Israel and Germany remain close and positive and will continue to be so. "It appears the comments in the Der Spiegel story are an attempt inside Germany to slam Merkel for her close ties with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu," he said"
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Netanyahu is a thug. His leadership is responsible for thousands of fatalities, mostly but not all Palestinian.

Israel should never forget or forgive all that unnecessary blood on his hands.
 

Elwood Diggler

Well-Known Member
He didn't register them under his own name. It is against Federal law for a Felon to possess firearms. If he used his own name and his story is true. Then it is an oversight by the state that can be corrected at any time


nope. same deal in michigan too as long as it wasn't a violent felony. have to wait 5 yrs after sentence completion i believe
 
Top