londonfog
Well-Known Member
Wow guy brags about paying stranger to fuck them in the ass. Hopefully that condom breaks and you catch a nice case of aids. Maybe you can pay for a cure, Hell you sound like the type that doesn't even use a condom.
Immunity for State Department Worker in E-mail Case
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
The prostitutes I use are women, not gay men. Aids or hiv isn't an issue.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Come on man, the Federalist Papers is pretty clearly a right wing house organ. One clue that a site is propaganda of the wingnut variety is that there is no balance in its reporting. Its all GOP party line or farther right stuff on those sites. Major newspapers can't legally operate that way, so they give equal time to some pretty shabby reporting from both sides in order to maintain balance. Another tell is whether or not the media site pisses off both sides, which the New York Times and Washington Post do pretty frequently. MSNBC has opted to become a left wing propaganda organ, for instance. You won't see me quoting them or FOX, ever.
So, no, our discussion did not end up with the pot calling the kettle black. The problem is that you have no use for anything that counters your right wing bias. Such as, Trump's legal troubles with Trump University. You say you don't care. And yet, you focus on Hillary's troubles with e-mail legalities. I think both are troubling. I'd like both to step down as candidates. I'd like you to stop being and idiot too. Just saying, we are different and its not just opposite ends of the spectrum.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
There is a major difference between what Trump did and what Hillary did, allegedly in both cases...
Trump's "victims" were volunteers and credulous.
Hillary's potential victims are all the citizens of the US and potentially any top secret operation and operative.
Trump's victims self subjected themselves to their own greed. Hillarys own desire to keep her own secrets could have endangered us all.
They're not comparable.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
sure thing bud because we all know that female prostitutes never have Aids or HIV
another dumb fuck
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You are right, what they did is not comparable. Trump preyed on people in the way of a con man. He took their trust and turned a profit on it.
What exactly do you think Hillary was up to? Where is the profit in her actions? I took a look at what she is accused of doing and as far as I can tell, she is guilty of not following procedure. I'm not excusing it like you do Trump. But to say a fraud designed to take money away from a trusting dupe is the on the same level as carelessness is beyond stupid.
Last edited:
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I
I thought the same thing when I read that. "oh, I'm safe because I only back door women." derp de derp de derpsure thing bud because we all know that female prostitutes never have Aids or HIV
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
With trump. .. a fool is born every minute, and he and his money will soon be parted.
With Clinton? I'm not Sure What She Was Up to. We can't know becuase she took measures to make sure her communications were kept private. Her communication as sec of state are supposed to be public records and she didn't want that. As a non elected official she has a duty and she violated it.
It's further compounded by her improper storage of classified documents there.
He charge is violating the publics trust.
Trump's charge is being rich and trying to make money.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Well at least we agree on one thing. I'm not sure that there was a motive in Hillary's case either. From what I've seen she was careless. That's nothing I want to see in a President.
A thief. That's what Trump was. You play it like the poor rich boy is being persecuted. He stole money. The people he stole money from trusted him and his name. That's beyond despicable. That you blame the victim is typical of your type.
It also explains why you have to pay for your intimate moments. Oh and before you say we are alike, in this we are not. I've had relationships with the women that were intimate with me. As in mutual respect along with pleasure.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
Gay hiv is much worse than hetero hiv. Look at magic Johnson and that boxer, Tony Morrison I think his name is, they have hetero hiv and are fine. But every man over 40 has lost a lot of friends to the gay hiv.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
That's really thick!
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
And LOL at "hetero hiv."
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you were better as bignbushy, or neitzschekeen, or whatever previous handle you used.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
Makes sense if you think about it. The virus doesn't really get spread to women by gay men. So it reproduces and evolves in the population the virus infects.
The fact that gay hiv is far worse than hetero hiv is proof that even evolution hates gay people, just as much as jesus and Mohammad.
The fact that gay hiv is far worse than hetero hiv is proof that even evolution hates gay people, just as much as jesus and Mohammad.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
horrible trolling. not even worth pointing out how horrible it is really.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
LOL. You are right guy. you have nothing to fear. In fact you go ahead and fuck female prostitutes in the ass. You don't even have to use a condom. Go raw and enjoy.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
Trolling is an effort to make people think you're being real. I have never been under any illusion that anyone would believe the whole prostitution/hetero hiv bit.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so anyhoo, what is the least racist part about your desire to build a wall on the mexico border, especially in light of the fact that only about half of all illegal immigrants are mexican, and about half of all illegal immigrants come here legally?