doingdishes
Well-Known Member
don't underestimate him....hahahe's really that stupid?shheeesus
Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances
- Thread starter Sandy420
- Start date
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Doingdishes, actually retaining me to prepare Wilcox's personal tax return would be in his best interest because I would be able to 'sanitize' it for him and maximize his deductions and minimize his tax liability. I have already researched the Income Tax Act and identified the applicable provisions either way.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i wouldn't underestimate his stupidity but it might help with you helping him...he needs all he can get.
i can't watch him. he bumbles his way through his show. doesn't appear too bright
realmeduser
Well-Known Member
Actually, if wilcox is on bc disability, he is only allowed to earn 8000 extra dollars per year without his disability cheque being deducted, and every penny he earns over his disability amount must be reported to the welfare office on his stub every month. Doing otherwise is welfare fraud.
That 8000 dollar amount was only put in place 12 to 18 months ago, it was many thousands less before that. Lock boxes musta bin cool while they lasted.
torontomeds
Well-Known Member
I did not know he was also the founder, anyways I find the fact that Alan Young is the vice pres most disturbing seeing as he was the first LP out the gate, I think Conroy achieved what he set out to do, Delay the MMAR via the injunction so the people in the know can continue to produce for the grey markets, at the same time alot of the same MMAR guys also had apps in to HC they wanted to play both sides of the fence.
All I can say is the fraud in the Canadian Cannabis community / industry is so much bigger then first expected.
From bogus strains being sold to LPs by MMAR growers then passed on to us by LPs, from greed and corruption, I truly hope the PM lets any responsible adult grow their own. It is easy for non Cannabis people to fall for the BS of the BC bunch, they do have big grows and they can grow nice plants so automatically when people see that they assume that theses people are the experts. Fact is all they do is pump out Cannabis like any other crop, sure they can tell you how to grow it but they actually do not know much about the plant in terms of strains, most of the guys who sold strains to the LPs just bought seeds from the BCBD and pawned off the strains as was sold to them, in some cases they even renamed the already fake bootleg strains. I can go on about it but will not.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
that became very apparent when he discontinued the appeal at the higher court. if he gave at least one shit, he would not have done that. either he is a complete putz or he knew he was screwing us. he went from a higher court who showed he had their attention down to a lower court that had no power to rule against an "equal level" judge. he could have gotten us our gardens back but took it away. that shows me that he is not really on "our" side.
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Very well stated Doingdishes..thank you for the overview...
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
Makes me wonder what kind of mail Mr Conroy must be getting. He seems a coy dodger that keeps his feet in all the waters in case ship jumping come to task.
I'd like to see him answer for all the money he's made on us.
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
If you
Go check it out for yourself...
If you go to his website, he explains why he did what he did. He says continuing the appeal in the higher court would have required "starting over" and that would just take longer to get to trial. He talks about strategy and what course of action had the best chance of success.
Go check it out for yourself...
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Redijedi, this is an admission of failure to properly prepare the initial statement of claim.
Last edited:
CannaReview
Well-Known Member
Well they wanted a million dollars that would have been more then enough to start over.
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
An admission of failure? I'm sorry I dont speak much legalese, please explain.
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
Do you understand that starting over would mean a ruling would be much further down the road? If you think taking HC to court wouldn't cost much, I urge you to go hire a lawyer and find out for yourself...
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Agreed, but ultimately if the end goal was REALLY to allow for ALL patients to have the right to grow, would it not be worth it?
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
he had the sympathy of the higher court. all he had to do was do up the form/motion and it would go through. it wouldn't be starting the whole case over...just the injunction.
i believe he was proven to have messed up and he's trying to cover his ass.
we are getting a lame duck lawyering from him. if he had the one extra plaintiff that was current in paperwork but needed changes, we wouldn't have had so many left outs. he used Beemish/Hebert as a two-fer and boy did that backfire!
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
The following is a post from Wilcox via his proxy and administrator Alison Myrden, former prison guard and shameless professional self-promoter who took possession of one of Wilcox's infamous lock boxes and failed to account for or return its contents. In his latest attempt at financial disclosure, Wilcox claims that he (the Coalition) is $400K in debt and that funding has all but dried up...this is a statement of 'insolvency' which precludes bankruptcy. Wilcox shall be liable for this debt along with Myrden and the rest of his so-called fund raisers and supporters. Wilcox and Myrden should provide an aged accounts payable analysis along with the claim that they owe $400K and not simply beg for more money without any accountability of past funds raised and wildly spent.on inefficient lawyers, first class travel and expensive hotels with fine dining facilities. Why did Wilcox not pay off this debt instead of handing over funds to Tousaw for his extraction action or handing of $1K to Aaron Bott for the defence of MACROS a unregulated private enterprise that is illegal under the law at the present time. Why not use these funds to file an appeal or start over with a new lawyer and fight continue to fight for the patient's right to self-produce or designate the production of organically grown strain specific medicinal cannabis without fear of discrimination, stigmatization or selective prosecution.
> 9 hrs ·- Jan 3, 2016
> Bad News from Jason Wilcox and the MMAR Coalition Against Repeal Group (Now known as "the Cannabis Rights Coalition").
> "Come join the thousands who set an Injunction in play here in Canada, sued the government for 40 million + and put them on trial for attempting to take our home personal cannabis gardens away from us for GOOD.
> To date we have raised $300,000, however as our Legal Advisor John Conroy QC noted, we have almost $400,000 in unpaid bills. In addition should we win or lose in Allard, the cost to fight an appeal is simply not there.
> The question came up of how we plan to fund the appeal in the case of a loss or even a loss?
> If we win we do not have the funds to fight what we feel would be sound appeal should it go that direction when the decision is handed down. The cost of the appeal could hit $100,000 as were also still working on expanding the injunction again in the case of a win in Alalrd.
> So win or loose we do not have the funds for appeal need be paid by us. If we win and appeal Mr. Conroy would get the majority back after all legal affairs in Allard commenced. All said I fear that lack of fundraising and efforts to disrupt the efforts of the Coalition has only led to out lead attorney potentially having to walk from Allard in the case of a loss.
> On the positive the Coalition
> 1. Secured an Injunction
> 2. Secured the appeal of the Injunction
> 3. Put the government on trial over parts of the MMPR
> 4. Sued the government for 40 million - 110 million dollar lawsuit
> The Coalition has proved to 4 federal judges so far that no Fire, Mold, or Organized crime was associated with medical home gardens hence the standing Injunction that'a in place. An Injunction is a fancy word for a "restraining order".
> As we move forward into 2016 our focus need remain of core historical legal battles such as Allard and R v Smith.
> In R v Smith we are waiting on the government to legislate what an extraction is legally?
> Till then all medically approved patients have a s.56 exemption from the CDSA thus you CANNOT be charged for having an extraction!
> It will remain this way until the goverment legislates R v Smith."
> Onward.
> We will NEVER give up.
> Respectfully,
> Alison Myrden
> Federal Medical Cannabis Exemptee in Canada since 1994
> http://www.AlisonMyrden.com/
> Retired Law Enforcement Officer
> Speaker for LEAP Since 2004
> Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
> http://www.leap.cc/
> Speaker for LPP
> Lawmen Protecting Patients
> http://www.lawmenpro.org/Lawmenpro/LPP_MAIN.html
> Canadian Patient Representative for the IACM
> International Association for Cannabinoid Medicines
> http://www.cannabis-med.org/
> Bonn, Germany
> Alison Myrden is part of the marijuana majority. Are you?
> http://www.MarijuanaMajority.com/
> MMAR Coalition against Repeal Lawsuit in Canada
> http://www.mmarcoalitionagainstrepeal.com/
> NDP Candidate for Oakville, Ontario 2004
> New Democratic Party of Canada
> http://www.ndp.ca
>
> 9 hrs ·- Jan 3, 2016
> Bad News from Jason Wilcox and the MMAR Coalition Against Repeal Group (Now known as "the Cannabis Rights Coalition").
> "Come join the thousands who set an Injunction in play here in Canada, sued the government for 40 million + and put them on trial for attempting to take our home personal cannabis gardens away from us for GOOD.
> To date we have raised $300,000, however as our Legal Advisor John Conroy QC noted, we have almost $400,000 in unpaid bills. In addition should we win or lose in Allard, the cost to fight an appeal is simply not there.
> The question came up of how we plan to fund the appeal in the case of a loss or even a loss?
> If we win we do not have the funds to fight what we feel would be sound appeal should it go that direction when the decision is handed down. The cost of the appeal could hit $100,000 as were also still working on expanding the injunction again in the case of a win in Alalrd.
> So win or loose we do not have the funds for appeal need be paid by us. If we win and appeal Mr. Conroy would get the majority back after all legal affairs in Allard commenced. All said I fear that lack of fundraising and efforts to disrupt the efforts of the Coalition has only led to out lead attorney potentially having to walk from Allard in the case of a loss.
> On the positive the Coalition
> 1. Secured an Injunction
> 2. Secured the appeal of the Injunction
> 3. Put the government on trial over parts of the MMPR
> 4. Sued the government for 40 million - 110 million dollar lawsuit
> The Coalition has proved to 4 federal judges so far that no Fire, Mold, or Organized crime was associated with medical home gardens hence the standing Injunction that'a in place. An Injunction is a fancy word for a "restraining order".
> As we move forward into 2016 our focus need remain of core historical legal battles such as Allard and R v Smith.
> In R v Smith we are waiting on the government to legislate what an extraction is legally?
> Till then all medically approved patients have a s.56 exemption from the CDSA thus you CANNOT be charged for having an extraction!
> It will remain this way until the goverment legislates R v Smith."
> Onward.
> We will NEVER give up.
> Respectfully,
> Alison Myrden
> Federal Medical Cannabis Exemptee in Canada since 1994
> http://www.AlisonMyrden.com/
> Retired Law Enforcement Officer
> Speaker for LEAP Since 2004
> Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
> http://www.leap.cc/
> Speaker for LPP
> Lawmen Protecting Patients
> http://www.lawmenpro.org/Lawmenpro/LPP_MAIN.html
> Canadian Patient Representative for the IACM
> International Association for Cannabinoid Medicines
> http://www.cannabis-med.org/
> Bonn, Germany
> Alison Myrden is part of the marijuana majority. Are you?
> http://www.MarijuanaMajority.com/
> MMAR Coalition against Repeal Lawsuit in Canada
> http://www.mmarcoalitionagainstrepeal.com/
> NDP Candidate for Oakville, Ontario 2004
> New Democratic Party of Canada
> http://www.ndp.ca
>
Last edited:
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
So from what I understand watching Wilcox's videos in the past is that the 400k is for monies owed to Mr.Conroy I believe, he had mentioned this in passing in an episode. But now it's a "well we had a good run, and if we win those included in the injunction are good but the left outs get no appeal, sorry"
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Let's do the math CalyxCrusher, first we have already paid Conroy approximately $300K and we still owe him $400K which makes a total of $700K that we have paid for a failed Allard Action which has left out no less than 50% of the MMAR patients...this figure does not include the $350K in pro bono work that Conroy claims to have donated..making the absolute cost of the Allard Action to be $1,050,000.00 to date.... or is this demand for the $400K owing the amount Conroy is demanding for his pro bono work now that 50% of his funding base has been left out of the funding pool and now interest has all but dried up in the Coalition.....