Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances

Nadine Bews said:

Let's do the math CalyxCrusher, first we have already paid Conroy approximately $300K and we still owe him $400K which makes a total of $700K that we have paid for a failed Allard Action which has left out no less than 50% of the MMAR patients...this figure does not include the $350K in pro bono work that Conroy claims to have donated..making the absolute cost of the Allard Action to be $1,050,000.00 to date.... or is this demand for the $400K owing the amount Conroy is demanding for his pro bono work now that 50% of his funding base has been left out of the funding pool and now interest has all but dried up in the Coalition.....

Click to expand...

CONroy keeps stating the $300k unbilled..so is it owed or was it donated?
even looking at what CONroy is saying-he wants a million for what we've received???!!
my other thought-what cases has CONroy won to have earned his "rockstar" status?? i know he's written some letters and started the BCCCS and MCRCI but those aren't cases.
where's his track record to show he's the right guy to have our case? i know these questions are kind of moot as he's on the case now but I am really curious. i have never heard of him before Allard

Nadine Bews said:

Let's do the math CalyxCrusher, first we have already paid Conroy approximately $300K and we still owe him $400K which makes a total of $700K that we have paid for a failed Allard Action which has left out no less than 50% of the MMAR patients...this figure does not include the $350K in pro bono work that Conroy claims to have donated..making the absolute cost of the Allard Action to be $1,050,000.00 to date.... or is this demand for the $400K owing the amount Conroy is demanding for his pro bono work now that 50% of his funding base has been left out of the funding pool and now interest has all but dried up in the Coalition.....

Click to expand...

Ouch, that's certainly more then I had thought they had received in total.

Sure doesn't look good. You really should be filing your application...might be the nail in the coffin.

bigmanc said:

Sure doesn't look good. You really should be filing your application...might be the nail in the coffin.

Click to expand...

She needs to solicit the funds first...lol

Lol I hope your kidding

bigmanc said:

Lol I hope your kidding

Click to expand...

Nope...see said it herself in this thread.

redi jedi said:

She needs to solicit the funds first...lol

Click to expand...

redijedi, I fail to see the humour in a failed legal action that cost almost one million dollars and financed by scarce pension funds that causes 20,000 patients to be labelled as criminals instead of as patients because of their choice of life-saving medicine and not having a few hundred dollars for filing fees to right the wrong. The Conroy-Wilcox partnership operating as the Coalition has failed to account for the money raised or report how it was spent and the BC Law Society has expressed no interest in Conroy's breach of professional conduct and wrongful conduct in attempting to extort a cut of the privacy breach from Kate Saunders at Branch MacMaster . I do not have the funds for filing fees although the application for audit is prepared so I have submitted my documents to the good folks at the corporate crimes office of the RCMP and at Revenue Canada and they do not require any filing fees prior to conducting an investigation.

Nadine Bews said:

redijedi, I fail to see the humour in a failed legal action that cost almost one million dollars and financed by scarce pension funds that causes 20,000 patients to be labelled as criminals instead of as patients because of their choice of life-saving medicine and not having a few hundred dollars for filing fees to right the wrong. The Conroy-Wilcox partnership operating as the Coalition has failed to account for the money raised or report how it was spent and the BC Law Society has expressed no interest in Conroy's breach of professional conduct and wrongful conduct in attempting to extort a cut of the privacy breach from Kate Saunders at Branch MacMaster . I do not have the funds for filing fees although the application for audit is prepared so I have submitted my documents to the good folks at the corporate crimes office of the RCMP and at Revenue Canada and they do not require any filing fees prior to conducting an investigation.

Click to expand...

I find the irony of it rather amusing...

How can you say a failed legal action when we are waiting for the Judges decision?

I would bet that the majority of funds raised by the coalition, didnt come from pensioners, more likely large MMAR growers...all them horrible system abusing DG's...

redi jedi said:

I find the irony of it rather amusing...

How can you say a failed legal action when we are waiting for the Judges decision?

I would bet that the majority of funds raised by the coalition, didnt come from pensioners, more likely large MMAR growers...all them horrible system abusing DG's...

Click to expand...

Of course you are correct redijedi, DGs are getting the last laugh and I have continually heard the echo of that laughter since commencing to post in this chat room, having no other alternative means of communication with the Coalition and its contributors...I have had dozens of cases of DGs breaking verbal agreements and withholding medicine at will from the patient. I have evidence that they freely overproduce their plant count without fear of persecution and grow 'trees' and sell the surplus product on the black market and to so-called 'compassion clubs' and dispensaries where patients pay no less than a 2,000% mark-up. The DG pays no taxes on the profits but still enjoys the protection of the law and the use of our highways, airports and hospitals...The DG has the cunning to hold patients as their hostage and then have the patients pay exorbitant amounts for their medicine. The kindly DG, through the Coalition, convinced the patient to fund raise in order to assist in financing the legal action to protect their monopoly. DGs are less likely to be left out of the Allard Action because they have an established facility and less likely the need to move and end up with an invalid licence. The DG then has the very last laugh when his right to grow has not been left out of the Allard Action and he gets busted for dealing the surplus, so he abandons the patient's right to grow and gets the patients to finance his defence and laughs all the way to his greenhouse and simply plants another crop. The DG's flagrant abuse of their authority has left an audit trail that clearly shows that elements of the 'underground' has easily infiltrated the MMAR DG program and the Coalition. Although the Coalition has removed their TEAM from their website it is a well-known fact that Wilcox and his principle administrators of the Coalition all claim to have affiliations with 'biker gangs' who certainly are a big hairy scarey looking bunch of men ie; Kelly. Kolodiazny, Dan Pagnutti, Kevin Sharpe, Maurice Fazio all who definitely fit the profile of such a member of society. Cannabis in Canada is a legalization operation owned by Wilcox and used to 'market' the Coalition which is all about dab fests and party buses and not about patients and the medicinal benefits of cannabis. I have no shortage of proof that the Coalition is administered according to LA Street Gang Rules and Looney Tunes policy. Wilcox and his 'associates' all proudly wear the Coalition's 'colours' on their Coalition t-shirts and their Coalition clubhouse is at Cannabis in Canada and the unelected president of the club is Wilcox who receives legal direction from Conroy. ...need I say more?...simply follow the little white lock boxes and you shall find a 467.111 under the CCC at the end of the audit trail. It is simply a matter of time until Revvenue Canada comes knocking on DG doors for an explanation on how they paid for their new RV or boat or down-payment on a house and don't try and say that it was 'gifted'because my East Indian and African clients have already maxed-out that shaded grey area of the Income Tax Act out in their real estate fraud scams and it is an instant alarm to a federal compliance officer..

Nadine..he's just playin with you by what I read,,

Just sayin.

LP's are designated growers
Some of us understand that much.

gb123 said:

Nadine..he's just playin with you by what I read,,

Just sayin.

LP's are designated growers
Some of us understand that much.

Click to expand...

You are incorrect gb123, LP's are what is termed 'public-private partnerships' and which are at the foundation of fascism where corporations dictate policy to government. I filed a Section 18 federal court request for a judicial review into the Health Canada LP Program for a client. There is also abundant evidence that the LP program is currently plagued with the same afflictions as the DG program...and why wouldn't it if they are to protect their long-standing interests in the production and distribution of cannabis...if this were any other industry, like oil exploration for example, the MMAR DG's would have simply been rolled over into the MMPR and is called a section roll-over for income tax purposes and is used frequently in highly regulated industries such as oil extraction and processing. The production of cannabis and the extraction of its essential elements is very similar to oil production and extraction of by products, the only difference is the marketing and delivery mechanisms...This is why wee need not an Order in Council to remove cannabis from the CDSA but a Cannabis Act which establishes the methods of production, processing, marketing and consumption of this highly coveted plant for medicinal and industrial purposes. Then we can start to work with all level of governments and departments to address the primary, secondary and tertiary products of the cannabis plant. The primary cannabis product is the raw plant which consumed by combustion,vaporization and ingestion through secondary cannabis products such as extracts and tinctures which form the basic ingredients for cannabis' tertiary products; medibles and the cannabis consumption lifestyple products. This would not only involve all levels of government but also include department officials from not only Health Canada and Justice but also from the departments of agriculture and industry to provide better direction on questions of common interest rather than being dictated to by a handful of HC bureaucrats who were unable to jump ship and get on board with an LP in favour for approving their application. The enactment of a Cannabis Act would require a series of public hearings just like when we repatriated the Canadian Constitution. When I was working with Senator Hays who co-chaired the Special Joint Senate-House of Commons Committee to Repatriate the Constitution I was instructed to prepare a list of witness to appear before the Committee and provide position papers on the section 15 equality provision guaranteeing the right to gender, race, religion,age and mental and physical well being without discrimination. When I had prepared the lists for each category, I thought that I had made a mistake because I only had two or three witnesses for the mental and physical well-being category and there were dozens of witnesses lined up for various religious and women's groups but only the Canadian Medical Association and Pharmaceutical associations were making presentations on behalf of patients. Sen. Hays told me that I had not erred but that patients were too ill to properly organize and prepare a position paper but "not to worry because the patients best interest shall be properly taken care of they these organizations." Neither Sen Hays nor I had not heard of the term Big Pharma at the time nor realized its influence. This is the reason why I acted as the founding chair of the Coalition; it was my intention to provide distinct and specific representation for the cannabis patient and to form a deliberative assembly so that the membership could be leveraged into official recognition and core funding from the government and so that proper position papers on legal and medicinal cannabis affairs could be prepared and delivered to society, special interest groups and government. It was not my intention to prepare a business plan and letters soliciting funding and support for Wilcox to raise funds in order to hold a series of vape parties and dab fests across the country promoting Cannabis in Canada, Red Beard Glass and other profiteers on the false assumption that the Coalition is a non-profit organization with a paid up voting membership providing distinct and specific representation of patient's right to produce organically grown strain specific cannabis without discrimination and fear of persecution.

Nadine, what's the application fee? I agree with redijedi, it is ironic to solicit for funds to prove previous funds were mishandled.

as much as one would think that Bigmanc Id think the opposite was true..specially if you indeed had a case.
Our court systems work exactly that way...doesn't matter who done wrong..you just need to prove it is all and You win!! Sad but true!

Me thinks she'll get the funds she needs as she's not about the willdick convoy!

As for the LP DG's and the illegal shit they have done since day one???
... Keep at it!!
They will fall sooner than later. Money has that effect on greedy MoFo's


I hope all you greedy friggin LP's are reading this..Your time will come!!!

gb123 said:

as much as one would think that Bigmanc Id think the opposite was true..specially if you indeed had a case.
Our court systems work exactly that way...doesn't matter who done wrong..you just need to prove it is all and You win!! Sad but true!

Me thinks she'll get the funds she needs as she's not about the willdick convoy!

As for the LP DG's and the illegal shit they have done since day one???
... Keep at it!!
They will fall sooner than later. Money has that effect on greedy MoFo's


I hope all you greedy friggin LP's are reading this..Your time will come!!!

Click to expand...

in some cases, they have to look at the evidence and "decide" if they agree that it's actionable. the BCLS wants first hand proof before they will go ahead. the person who is directly "in the know" about the Branch McMasters stuff hasn't filed the complaint. if that person does then they will take action. until then, they consider it "hearsay'
in civil, you can sue anyone for anything if you have the filing fee. then you get to fight it out. even police have to present their evidence in order for them to decide to lay charges or not

Although I read the posts here on a regular basis, I seldom comment. But I feel like I must add my two cents worth today. I have my pinks under the MMAR programme and have grown both inside and outside; had to do some seaching back in the beginning to find a specialist who would sign off on the papers (for no charge); i am in receipt of a piddly CPP Disability pension...........and I await the Allard decision along with everybody else. I must say that I am not impressed with the language used on this thread with respect to Mr. Conroy. But for his efforts I would have had to stop my (legal) grow some time ago. As far as I am concerned, a delayed Allard decision is as good as a win. I understand that not everybody is in my position. But slagging the legal team does not help our cause at all. I read some of these posts and wonder who are the cops on here just trying to raise shit..........who are the agent provocoteurs..........and who are the bullshit atrists looking for their minute of fame ?

I cannot afford to buy my meds from an LP - straight and simple. If we lose the Allard decision then I will not be able to grow inside (too big a risk of voiding the house insurance or mortgage terms). That leaves me growing outside - a much bigger challange. I am a senior citizen with chronic pain and chronic exhaustion. Alot of folks on this site think they know a whole lot about the law. I think that they are blowing it out their arse...........

willieboy said:

Although I read the posts here on a regular basis, I seldom comment. But I feel like I must add my two cents worth today. I have my pinks under the MMAR programme and have grown both inside and outside; had to do some seaching back in the beginning to find a specialist who would sign off on the papers (for no charge); i am in receipt of a piddly CPP Disability pension...........and I await the Allard decision along with everybody else. I must say that I am not impressed with the language used on this thread with respect to Mr. Conroy. But for his efforts I would have had to stop my (legal) grow some time ago. As far as I am concerned, a delayed Allard decision is as good as a win. I understand that not everybody is in my position. But slagging the legal team does not help our cause at all. I read some of these posts and wonder who are the cops on here just trying to raise shit..........who are the agent provocoteurs..........and who are the bullshit atrists looking for their minute of fame ?

I cannot afford to buy my meds from an LP - straight and simple. If we lose the Allard decision then I will not be able to grow inside (too big a risk of voiding the house insurance or mortgage terms). That leaves me growing outside - a much bigger challange. I am a senior citizen with chronic pain and chronic exhaustion. Alot of folks on this site think they know a whole lot about the law. I think that they are blowing it out their arse...........

Click to expand...

well do you know how we are getting lame duck lawyering by CONroy?
he used Beemish/Hebert as a 2-fer-expired permits as well as needing to move gardens. Since he did that, half of the patients got left out...like yourself who needs an address change. we are called left outs. if CONroy had kept the injunction challenge in the higher court where he had sympathy from the judges-shown by them going back to ask why there were people who didn't get relief-there would be a lot less left outs and we'd be able to change addresses. he should not have discontinued.
Wilcox said they still working on expanding on the injunction which makes no sense.
how is it you see CONroy as doing a great job? i am sincerely asking because i don't get how people think he's good.

Nadine Bews said:

redijedi, I fail to see the humour in a failed legal action that cost almost one million dollars and financed by scarce pension funds that causes 20,000 patients to be labelled as criminals instead of as patients because of their choice of life-saving medicine and not having a few hundred dollars for filing fees to right the wrong. The Conroy-Wilcox partnership operating as the Coalition has failed to account for the money raised or report how it was spent and the BC Law Society has expressed no interest in Conroy's breach of professional conduct and wrongful conduct in attempting to extort a cut of the privacy breach from Kate Saunders at Branch MacMaster . I do not have the funds for filing fees although the application for audit is prepared so I have submitted my documents to the good folks at the corporate crimes office of the RCMP and at Revenue Canada and they do not require any filing fees prior to conducting an investigation.

Click to expand...

IMO you have a case for CRA and the RCMP. Lock boxes missing should be that reason. I'm for a full accounting of the funds used.

The absolute highest filing fee i have found in Alberta is $525 and there is also many filing fee waivers. That is for matters greater then $250,000. Lets see how this plays out, i like a good mystery.

willieboy said:

Although I read the posts here on a regular basis, I seldom comment. But I feel like I must add my two cents worth today. I have my pinks under the MMAR programme and have grown both inside and outside; had to do some seaching back in the beginning to find a specialist who would sign off on the papers (for no charge); i am in receipt of a piddly CPP Disability pension...........and I await the Allard decision along with everybody else. I must say that I am not impressed with the language used on this thread with respect to Mr. Conroy. But for his efforts I would have had to stop my (legal) grow some time ago. As far as I am concerned, a delayed Allard decision is as good as a win. I understand that not everybody is in my position. But slagging the legal team does not help our cause at all. I read some of these posts and wonder who are the cops on here just trying to raise shit..........who are the agent provocoteurs..........and who are the bullshit atrists looking for their minute of fame ?

I cannot afford to buy my meds from an LP - straight and simple. If we lose the Allard decision then I will not be able to grow inside (too big a risk of voiding the house insurance or mortgage terms). That leaves me growing outside - a much bigger challange. I am a senior citizen with chronic pain and chronic exhaustion. Alot of folks on this site think they know a whole lot about the law. I think that they are blowing it out their arse...........

Click to expand...

doingdishes said:

well do you know how we are getting lame duck lawyering by CONroy?
he used Beemish/Hebert as a 2-fer-expired permits as well as needing to move gardens. Since he did that, half of the patients got left out...like yourself who needs an address change. we are called left outs. if CONroy had kept the injunction challenge in the higher court where he had sympathy from the judges-shown by them going back to ask why there were people who didn't get relief-there would be a lot less left outs and we'd be able to change addresses. he should not have discontinued.
Wilcox said they still working on expanding on the injunction which makes no sense.
how is it you see CONroy as doing a great job? i am sincerely asking because i don't get how people think he's good.

Click to expand...

I see both sides of the fence here, those are both good arguments.

I'm all for a full accounting of where my money went. I'm not just blindly trusting Conroy anymore. I'm quite suspicious of conduct now.