CannaReview
Well-Known Member
but we're here to take over from now on, says the CDN gov. Remember those times where we demonized, jailed and took your property and children for growing weed. Well you can now just buy it from us now.
Thanks for building the cannabis market
- Thread starter CannaReview
- Start date
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i agree..now they are the experts....how did they get that title? how did they get experience or expertise? i few months ago, Rona said there was no studies and none done by HC so how is it possible that in a very short time, they became experts?
oh yeah, it's the Government.....rant over
oh yeah, it's the Government.....rant over
nsbudca
Well-Known Member
Fuckers.
I don't know how it possibly took this long for law enforcement and governments to wake up and smell the weed.
Now that they have it's all about money in their pockets. I'm sure there will be plant limits but I'm expecting them to be no greater than six per person and that may even be a reach.
Hopefully the medical system is exempt from certain aspects of legalization as far as plant counts without having to go to court.
I don't know how it possibly took this long for law enforcement and governments to wake up and smell the weed.
Now that they have it's all about money in their pockets. I'm sure there will be plant limits but I'm expecting them to be no greater than six per person and that may even be a reach.
Hopefully the medical system is exempt from certain aspects of legalization as far as plant counts without having to go to court.
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
This is what I've been SCREAMING here for....EVER...as some say
Thank you so much for saying that as well. Us older guys don't forget the kicking and beatings we got... I NEVER will. now it my turn to make them pay.
I won't be this guy........Come on folks..don't be this guy in the pic here
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Unless they say fuck it thats too complicated, and dismantle the medical system and move everyone over to a Rec system. Wouldn't put it past them the lazy fucks. Thanks for the higher taxes on my meds.....................
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
I can't see that happening. I will be shocked if they banned home growing for rec, and MMJ patients have a need rather than a want, so I think we'll be fine. Even in Washington State where rec home grows are not allowed, medical patients can grow. Colorado has a 6 plant limit for rec and patients are exempt. I think giving the LP's first crack at the rec market will be enough to take some of the medical side away from them without too much flak. Legal or not, I'm not shutting up until my right to grow is guaranteed.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i don't think they will be able to ban home grows for medical but i have been wrong before.
if they say no to home-grows - there will be many law suits
if they say no to home-grows - there will be many law suits
kDude
Well-Known Member
works the other way too;
...if there wasn't any rec people putting their freedom on the line for so many decades.. there'd be no medical.
nobody important 666
Well-Known Member
Legalized for rec will mean legal to grow. It would only be illegal to sell (income tax fraud). Just like anything else that is for sale. What you be charged with illegal production of an legal good. That would get laughed out of court.
CannaReview
Well-Known Member
Well there is no info whether they will allow Canadians to grow. https://www.liberal.ca/realchange/marijuana/ says nothing about growing. It say more about punishment and making money off of cannabis than any hint on home growing.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i wonder then if they are going to cut out the existing MMAR growers
nobody important 666
Well-Known Member
It already has. Mmar is dead. The judge is ruling of the mmrp is constitutionial. Its upto hc to determine how the program moves forward after the decision. With any luck the ruling will be in our favour and it will be legal to grow. But ultimately hc has the final say. Personally i think that hc will drag its feet until the law is changed for rec so that way they can wash their hands of it. A premature program will not fly because big pharma and insurance dont what to give a din number and loose on the billions from the bs pills they want to stuff down your throats. Also lps will be pushing for a rec market because i think that was the plan along. Just like everyone else they cant see anything but dollars. Sorry about the rant but nobody cares about the patients.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
what's the injunction if the MMAR is already dead? i am wondering about the patients that are not left out that are legal to grow. will they just say "too bad so sad"?
there will be lawsuits if that's the case. i hope Phelan isn't that short sighted...but he may as well be with the time he's taking to make up his mind..or at least release his decision.
maybe Phelan is talking to HC before releasing the decision
realmeduser
Well-Known Member
I don't think he is allowed to talk to HC about his decision. He is supposed to weigh the evidence presented in court.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i agree completely...he's not supposed to but if he says he's going to rule in our favour, maybe he's giving them a heads up and they asked for some time to get a program in place.
this is only speculation. i have nothing to back it up....one reason i think about as to what the hold up is. it's nuts having to wait like this.
i feel like a dog waiting by the window everyday...."will it be today?? will it be today??"
JungleStrikeGuy
Well-Known Member
No, the courts have the 'final' say. If it was up to HC there would be no medical program whatsoever. If Phelan rules in our favour, we will likely see the 'of no force and effect, suspend declaration of invalidity to allow govt to change things' pattern.
Also there will be no 'grandfathering' or 'only MMAR can grow' situation. Whatever Phelan arrives at will apply to all 'medically approved' patients. For MMAR exclusive 'right to grow', each MMAR person would need to have a constitutional exemption from the CDSA, and that is something that is almost never given even on a temporary basis (Mernagh and Parker are the only to ever get this to the best of my knowledge).
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
but HC can do the bare minimum like they have.
look at the most recent-Smith case for edibles-we can possess in any form...we just can't make it.
we needed reasonable access etc-Dg's could then grow for 2 people. addresses were to be able to have multiple licenses and HC made it so only 4 per address...etc. that's how they will have the final say
look at the most recent-Smith case for edibles-we can possess in any form...we just can't make it.
we needed reasonable access etc-Dg's could then grow for 2 people. addresses were to be able to have multiple licenses and HC made it so only 4 per address...etc. that's how they will have the final say
TheRealDman
Well-Known Member
Absolutely correct! Any "in chambers" discussions without both parties being present would lead to an instant mistrial!