AquariusPanta
Well-Known Member
PLC website shows they're using the best available CXB 3070 3500K chips, BB-bin (link). Additionally they aren't being ran at the same current, with the CX300 running ~1.4A+ per COB and the GGL 300 at 1.33A, as stated on their site. This means the GGL is dissipating ~282W, not 300W.Lol sigh....
CXB 3070 AD bin 3500k (PLC) is roughly 5% more efficient than CXB 3070 AB 3000k (GGL) including the lumen jump for higher temp
Both @ 300 watts to 6 cobs not including drivers.
They are dissipating same wattage.
At RIU price GGL is roughly 10% less expensive than PLC
That leaves GGL still 5% lower on $/dissipated watt
How are you working your numbers out?
Your math is still showing PLC roughly 10% higher at $/par w
How is this logical?
Now we all know PLC is best because of better name brand MW drivers for the extra money. And you can dial their drivers down to even more efficency and for cloning/germinating.
I'm just wanting to see the "long hand" that you used to make your conclusions. I know on the thread you linked a lot of the COBs were not shown as rated exactly at the wattage these lights are running. GGL should be 5% better but you're showing still 10% worse. So there's fudging involved but by math in my head you're 15% off. But it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong.
*what date will your C10 xl be available?
Quality COBS make a difference. So do drivers. I've said it before and I'll state it again, a COB is only as good as it's driver.
I don't mind showing my work and will make it easier for anyone to follow along with my math by displaying this in the coming day(s). Warning, it's not rocket science!
For any inquires about anything else not relating to this thread, please find an alternative destination to send those questions.