Election 2015
- Thread starter WHATFG
- Start date
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
He also said Trudeau wants to "normalize" marijuana....the horrors! When 60-75% of the country is pro ' marijuana law reform', is that statement not an endorsement for Justin Trudeau?
Jackal69
Well-Known Member
It should surprise you , by not being surprised!!!!
why doesn't this surprise me?
Jackal69
Well-Known Member
Wait till you never see made in Canada anymore.... just packed... or imported.... assembled .....
It's what everyone wants eh?
Cheap no matter how it's produced... as long as it's pennies per pound
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
We aren't really 'at this'...just Harpshit playing games. Stephen Harper disolved parliament...he is an MP, not PM at the moment. Our constitution forbids a government from entering into any agreement during the election without the support of ALL parties. The fascist prick won't even brief the other leaders on the details. There is a very good chance we will have a minority government of some flavour, and Mulcair said he would tear it up....
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Every day, I Discover a New Reason to Vote out Harper
Posted: 10/02/2015 12:34 pm EDT Updated: 10/02/2015 12:59 pm EDT
When new Canadian leaders are elected, I try to keep an open mind and give them a chance before passing judgement. It seems to me that's the Canadian way.
Stephen Harper was no exception: in 2006, I actually looked forward to seeing where he would lead our country.
But before long, I found myself getting concerned about the direction he and his team were taking us -- concerned enough to start keeping a 'blog-book' of policies and actions that were making me uneasy.
I'm sad to report that my blog-book now has many entries. Here's one:
The Death of Evidence?
Each summer, our family has a ceremonial bonfire to celebrate the end of the school year. Last June, my son gleefully tossed several of his notebooks into the flames -- to my chagrin. But, realistically, it probably wasn't much of a loss since the contents are just a quick Google search away.
Contrast those notebooks to the nine libraries of Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans -- world famous collections of unique information that will never be available through Google. Rachel Carson used the library in St. Andrews, New Brunswick, when she was researching Silent Spring.
In 2013, seven of the nine libraries -- including the one in St. Andrews, which had just been upgraded -- were closed. In theory, all information was to be digitized and made centrally available. In reality, not enough money was set aside for that task, so dumpsters full of irreplaceable collections were sent to landfills instead. All, apparently, to save a half million dollars.
Libraries at Health Canada and -- just last month -- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada have met similar fates.
Some refer to this disturbing trend as the death of evidence. It's worrisome, because if the decisions our leaders are making are not based on evidence anymore, just what are they based on?
And here's another:
Posted: 10/02/2015 12:34 pm EDT Updated: 10/02/2015 12:59 pm EDT
When new Canadian leaders are elected, I try to keep an open mind and give them a chance before passing judgement. It seems to me that's the Canadian way.
Stephen Harper was no exception: in 2006, I actually looked forward to seeing where he would lead our country.
But before long, I found myself getting concerned about the direction he and his team were taking us -- concerned enough to start keeping a 'blog-book' of policies and actions that were making me uneasy.
I'm sad to report that my blog-book now has many entries. Here's one:
The Death of Evidence?
Each summer, our family has a ceremonial bonfire to celebrate the end of the school year. Last June, my son gleefully tossed several of his notebooks into the flames -- to my chagrin. But, realistically, it probably wasn't much of a loss since the contents are just a quick Google search away.
Contrast those notebooks to the nine libraries of Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans -- world famous collections of unique information that will never be available through Google. Rachel Carson used the library in St. Andrews, New Brunswick, when she was researching Silent Spring.
In 2013, seven of the nine libraries -- including the one in St. Andrews, which had just been upgraded -- were closed. In theory, all information was to be digitized and made centrally available. In reality, not enough money was set aside for that task, so dumpsters full of irreplaceable collections were sent to landfills instead. All, apparently, to save a half million dollars.
Libraries at Health Canada and -- just last month -- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada have met similar fates.
Some refer to this disturbing trend as the death of evidence. It's worrisome, because if the decisions our leaders are making are not based on evidence anymore, just what are they based on?
And here's another:
Behind the smokescreen of Terrorism
While on a business trip to Venezuela years ago, I suddenly found myself in the middle of civil unrest. It was frightening; there were riots, curfews and soldiers everywhere. I still remember my late night flight out of Caracas -- one of the last before the airport was closed. Upon landing back in Canada, I wanted to kiss the ground, so grateful was I for the peace, civility and freedom we have here.
But Bill C-51 proves that we should take none of this for granted. Shrewdly marketed as part of the "war on terrorism," it gives sweeping new powers to Canada's security and intelligence agencies. It allows them to spy on you and me on the slightest suspicion that we might be up to mischief, or throw us in jail without charge. It allows them to do things you and I would go to jail for - including using questionable means to extract information.
Under Bill C-51, the definition of terrorism is thrown wide open to include anything from protests to blogs. The bill allows our personal information to be widely shared within government, and even with foreign security agencies.
Bill C-51 has been roundly condemned by the Canadian Bar Association. Five former Supreme Court justices and four former prime ministers have spoken out against it. After analyzing the bill, more than 100 law professors sent an open letter to all MPs urging them to vote against it. But none of that mattered in the end -- the Harper government used its majority to pass C-51 earlier this year. A National Post columnist denounced the bill as having "a whiff of totalitarianism."
Of course threats against our national security should never be taken casually, but most experts agree Bill C-51 is a massive overstretch; it's an egregious breach of our rights and freedoms.
From Blog to Facebook
I am a reluctant activist. I don't like rocking the boat. But when our federal election was called in August, it occurred to me that the entries in my blog might be worth sharing. So I'm posting 78 of them to a Facebook page, 78 Days, 78 Reasons: one for each day of the campaign. It's my hope they'll help reasonable Canadians, particularly young people and small c-conservatives, see that we deserve better than Stephen Harper because we are better than Stephen Harper.
"You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it," Mr. Harper said in 2006. I worry it's true, and this is my little effort to push back.
While on a business trip to Venezuela years ago, I suddenly found myself in the middle of civil unrest. It was frightening; there were riots, curfews and soldiers everywhere. I still remember my late night flight out of Caracas -- one of the last before the airport was closed. Upon landing back in Canada, I wanted to kiss the ground, so grateful was I for the peace, civility and freedom we have here.
But Bill C-51 proves that we should take none of this for granted. Shrewdly marketed as part of the "war on terrorism," it gives sweeping new powers to Canada's security and intelligence agencies. It allows them to spy on you and me on the slightest suspicion that we might be up to mischief, or throw us in jail without charge. It allows them to do things you and I would go to jail for - including using questionable means to extract information.
Under Bill C-51, the definition of terrorism is thrown wide open to include anything from protests to blogs. The bill allows our personal information to be widely shared within government, and even with foreign security agencies.
Bill C-51 has been roundly condemned by the Canadian Bar Association. Five former Supreme Court justices and four former prime ministers have spoken out against it. After analyzing the bill, more than 100 law professors sent an open letter to all MPs urging them to vote against it. But none of that mattered in the end -- the Harper government used its majority to pass C-51 earlier this year. A National Post columnist denounced the bill as having "a whiff of totalitarianism."
Of course threats against our national security should never be taken casually, but most experts agree Bill C-51 is a massive overstretch; it's an egregious breach of our rights and freedoms.
From Blog to Facebook
I am a reluctant activist. I don't like rocking the boat. But when our federal election was called in August, it occurred to me that the entries in my blog might be worth sharing. So I'm posting 78 of them to a Facebook page, 78 Days, 78 Reasons: one for each day of the campaign. It's my hope they'll help reasonable Canadians, particularly young people and small c-conservatives, see that we deserve better than Stephen Harper because we are better than Stephen Harper.
"You won't recognize Canada when I'm through with it," Mr. Harper said in 2006. I worry it's true, and this is my little effort to push back.
i was just watching trudeau give a live speech unveiling the liberals entire platform (so the ticker said on the bottom of the screen) and then harper cuts in with a live transmission about the TPP deal... perfect timing but what a dick move and it shows they are getting desperate. seems like they are getting a little scared of the red tide that's coming
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
4 days till the advanced polls and the Libs are in the lead. FYI- The liberals will have a dedicated phone line for people who are denied the right to vote for ANY reason, don't let the nazi get away with it this time.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i don't buy into the poll stuff. all the polls here in BC said that Clark wouldn't win but when all was said and done, she won. how could the polls get it so wrong?
i see the CONs gaining and I can't help but wonder-are those people actually paying attention? if they are, why are they so complacent ?? i see Harper killing our country and being smug about it.
what are they missing or what am I missing??
i see the CONs gaining and I can't help but wonder-are those people actually paying attention? if they are, why are they so complacent ?? i see Harper killing our country and being smug about it.
what are they missing or what am I missing??
Ndp minority. I call it right now.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
that's what I am hoping for...or Lib with NDP as opposition. i don't want Harper anywhere in our next Government....please!!
ricky1lung
Well-Known Member
Gonna be a lib minority.
Ndp has never formed a gov before at the fed level and Mulcair has made some mistakes that have made him lose major ground. At the provincial level, look to the Selinger gov in Manitoba and the approval rating of the NDP there. His own party tried to toss him, they won't get many votes there.
Trudeau has the best chance at beating the cons at this point, tbh I'd love to see the libs and ndp hammer the cons like the libs were in the last election.
Ndp has never formed a gov before at the fed level and Mulcair has made some mistakes that have made him lose major ground. At the provincial level, look to the Selinger gov in Manitoba and the approval rating of the NDP there. His own party tried to toss him, they won't get many votes there.
Trudeau has the best chance at beating the cons at this point, tbh I'd love to see the libs and ndp hammer the cons like the libs were in the last election.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
anyone but Harper