George Zimmerman is sub-human.

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I would have confronted him. No doubt in my mind and I guess in some people's mind I would have earned a death penalty for confronting someone stalking me. We can agree to disagree. Zimmerman is nothing but pussy stain who killed an innocent kid.
You need to get a dictionary, continued observation of a moving subject during one drawn out incident isn't stalking. If he had done it on multiple days/evenings, then you could lay that claim. I understand saying "stalking" makes you feel like your wild conclusions about GZ's intent are legitimate, but observing is observing.

We can agree to disagree. I'm a big G. Gordon Liddy fan, he popularized the term. Great customer of mine up in Northern VA for years.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I argued my case logically and calmly. I understand that doesn't jibe with your supposedly "not a liberal" sensibilities, but, you might want to face the harsh reality you lost this one.

Ignore feature is brilliant, if my superior position flummoxes you so much, you should use it.
 

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
I argued my case logically and calmly. I understand that doesn't jibe with your supposedly "not a liberal" sensibilities, but, you might want to face the harsh reality you lost this one.

Ignore feature is brilliant, if my superior position flummoxes you so much, you should use it.
You ignore everyone who disagrees with you you won't see any comments ever again. :bigjoint:
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I would have confronted him. No doubt in my mind and I guess in some people's mind I would have earned a death penalty for confronting someone stalking me. We can agree to disagree. Zimmerman is nothing but pussy stain who killed an innocent kid.
My guess is Zimmerman did more than stalk the kid. He probably showed his weapon after he confronted Martin
Martin in fear for his life attacked someone who threatened him
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
Except for reality, of course. I've been proven correct in EVERY INSTANCE. That's the inescapable fact that destroys your "feels".
I argued my case logically and calmly. I understand that doesn't jibe with your supposedly "not a liberal" sensibilities, but, you might want to face the harsh reality you lost this one.

Ah yes, the expected declared victory from the minority opinion.

Many of us recognize your grandiose delusions as an indication of mental instability.

:mrgreen:
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
We should just have trials on the internet because somehow, people who are sitting in front of their computers know more than investigators who were on scene and jurors who were in court.

Interneters can even tell you what these people were fucking thinking and doing during the whole ordeal, without any physical evidence at all.

Fucking amazing.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
We should just have trials on the internet because somehow, people who are sitting in front of their computers know more than investigators who were on scene and jurors who were in court.

Interneters can even tell you what these people were fucking thinking and doing during the whole ordeal, without any physical evidence at all.

Fucking amazing.
So OJ Simpson didn't kill 2 people?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
I am not a lib. I am just really, really confused how someone can chase someone down, and then claim self-defense. Self-defense has to start with trying to get AWAY. You can't go start a fight, get your ass kicked, shoot the person and walk away free and call it justice. If you instigate the incident, how the hell can that be self-defense?
Then, my 2nd huge problem is that at no point has he shown even one ounce of regret. He actually seems to take pride in taking the life of another human being. Anyone who knows anything about death knows that is not normal human emotions. There is something really screwed up in that guy and he will kill again.
Following someone is not "someone can chase someone down". Zimmerman had supposedly stopped following Martin when Martin doubled back and attacked Zimmerman. You twist the details to support your preconceived notion of "justice".
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Got it, you are out of your mind. It was legal for him to do it, doesn't mean it is right. It is illegal for you to smoke marijuana but does that make it morally wrong to do so?

Also easy to see you have never experienced death.
Idiotic metaphor that has nothing to do with the case at hand. You also have never experienced death
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I would have confronted him. No doubt in my mind and I guess in some people's mind I would have earned a death penalty for confronting someone stalking me. We can agree to disagree. Zimmerman is nothing but pussy stain who killed an innocent kid.
Substantial evidence exists that Martin was no innocent, regardless of how you try to falsely portray him.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Ah yes, the expected declared victory from the minority opinion.

Many of us recognize your grandiose delusions as an indication of mental instability.

:mrgreen:
Minority opinion? You think highly of a few fellow lib stoners on a forum. Minority...lol. He was found not guilty...Fact.

Every situation that the nitwits have called for his incarceration has ended up either being false or Zimmerman being the victim.

If you ever want to commit suicide, climb a liberal's ego and jump to his IQ.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
OJ Simson was found innocent as well
So was Casey Anthony

He did, and everyone knows it,....however, he planned it well and circumvented that .."beyond a shadow of a doubt" ..order. That also applies to you should you give it a try.

He got away with it.......because of the laws of conviction. George did too.
 
Top