Mercury fillings are safe.Well, I have never seen the Matrix since I am not into all that scifi imaginary non sense. This is not a theory. Here is an article from Time magazine about how bad the fluoride is. Not in My Water Supply - TIME
This is a real issue, but you can call me a theorist if you'd like. I don't go around talking to people about fluoride in the water, I just happened to run across this thread.
People that take EVERYTHING the gov/doctors says as the truth, have a definite problem. Take the mercury in fillings for instance. For years, they were considered safe, no body thought twice about them. But now the FDA is finally going back and finding all sorts of things wrong with them. Many dentists are refusing to use the mercury fillings anymore, and I'm sure they will soon be banned. Yet 20yrs ago, these were the best way to fill a tooth.
Just because we thought something was the right thing to do, doesn't always mean that it was. We can come across new facts and this will change the way every one thinks about things. This is what is going on with the fluoride. People are realizing they don't need it in their water. It is good for you applied topically, thats why its in our toothpaste. But if you read a warning on toothpaste, it says if more than used for brushing is swallowed, call poison control. If the fluoride wasn't bad for you, why would toothpaste have a warning like this?
Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorists. But with this issue, you can't deny the facts that 32% of american children have dental fluorosis and that children in communities with fluoridated water don't have a lower rate of severe tooth decay. And these are the reasons we they want to put it in our water. Seems reasonable right?
They just throw shit like this in there, when it's completely irrelevant. This has absolutely nothing to do with water.TIME Magazine said:Hydrogen fluoride is regulated as a hazardous pollutant in emissions from chemical plants and has been linked to respiratory illness.
Right... yet there hasn't been one patient diagnosed with osteosarcoma, with tap water being the cause.TIME Magazine said:The 2001 thesis showed a sevenfold increased risk of osteosarcoma in preadolescent boys from fluoridated water.
Looks like you've been on the loony-go-round just a liiiittle bit too long.Most people are being taken for a ride,
B.S.Mercury fillings are safe.
Fluroide is absolutly known to lower the rate of tooth decay. There is no question.
See what I'm talking about? A SINGLE internet article? Why would you assume something so stupid?Seriously, wow. First of all, your first paragraph makes it painstakingly obvious the only reason you posted is because you felt under fire by me.
First of all I apologized for any harshness that might be contracted from that first post. Second of all you say "'we' never seem to want to discuss the fact, but instead just laugh and make insults". Are you even serious? The only things I even argued about WERE the facts, or, given my position, YOUR LACK of facts.
And what the fuck is that supposed to mean? It means you're gullible, and can be convinced by a single internet article. By no means is the internet the only place for false information, but I was using that because that's where the majority of your propaganga comes from, and you further incriminate yourself by later telling people to "look up" another conspiracy theory.
I didn't say, "You read one article and decided to be a conspiracy theorist." No. The point was, all it takes is one false internet article to convince someone, and after they decide to look into it further, they crawl deeper into the spawning grounds of misinformation, the internet. I'm glad you've found these "alternative subjects" worth your time for the past decade.See what I'm talking about? A SINGLE internet article? Why would you assume something so stupid?
I have been researching "alternative subjects" for over 10 years straight now. These are not things you can expect to know a lot about overnight.
MY bad on this one, I'm reading up on it right now. First of all I'll at least commend you on the fact that you at least know a little about the psychology, or at least the presumed psychology of the subject. The way you said it I thought it was another conspiracy theory.I don't even want to bother reading my whole post again, but I am pretty sure the only thing I told people to "look up" was Hitler's Big Lie. Please tell me, how in the world, is Hitler's Big Lie a "conspiracy theory?" That is the dumbest shit I have read all day. Hitler's Big Lie is a concept, not a conspiracy theory.
I didn't say, "You read one article and decided to be a conspiracy theorist." No. The point was, all it takes is one false internet article to convince someone, and after they decide to look into it further, they crawl deeper into the spawning grounds of misinformation, the internet. I'm glad you've found these "alternative subjects" worth your time for the past decade.
MY bad on this one, I'm reading up on it right now. First of all I'll at least commend you on the fact that you at least know a little about the psychology, or at least the presumed psychology of the subject. The way you said it I thought it was another conspiracy theory.
Anyways since you feel that Hitlers Big Lie is what's going on, why don't you enlighten us to what the little true lie is? I couldn't help but notice your first post contained nothing factual, and sounded like you didn't even want to try.