Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

see4

Well-Known Member
Church and State had nothing to do with it.

The correct courts to battle this alteration denied it every time, the incorrect Court to hear the matter sent it to the correct court every time. It wasn`t until Gay judges were appointed to the wrong court for this hearing that that wrong Court heard and ruled on the matter. Guess which rule they made.

No State and Church had nothing to do with it. As you know, this was not a unanimous vote on the Ruling. But a win`s a win,...Right ? It is to me.
No.
Bible thumpers think because a book of fairy tales tells them gay people are bad, they somehow think it needs to be law. Up until the SC ruling, it was. That is not separation of church and state. My argument still stands.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
It doesn`t mean two shits if I or one believes in a book of fairy tales that no-one has died and came back to say it`s failed.

The incentive was not a book in the Bible either.

Religion or not, I think Gay behavior is horridly bad, inexcusable and not just foreplay kinky sex as they would like you to believe. I think it`s a personal thing people should keep in the bedroom ,.. the rainbow/Gay WTF people, all over the street make`n it a way of life don`t sit well with me.

I`m not living in the land of fuck everything, marry what eva, and call yourself my equals, and know many that don`t want to either. Freedom is also being free to keep people away as well. Freedom is also a come as you are , fuck anyone willing, stick your cock in it, house party.

The church and State have nothing to do with it.

Wanna know why the whole world isn`t Gay,.......Cuz some people don`t like it......Live with it, but not like it is also freedom.

Let them be free, let them be Gay, but don`t let them get in your fucking way..........
 

see4

Well-Known Member
It doesn`t mean two shits if I or one believes in a book of fairy tales that no-one has died and came back to say it`s failed.

The incentive was not a book in the Bible either.

Religion or not, I think Gay behavior is horridly bad, inexcusable and not just foreplay kinky sex as they would like you to believe. I think it`s a personal thing people should keep in the bedroom ,.. the rainbow/Gay WTF people, all over the street make`n it a way of life don`t sit well with me.

I`m not living in the land of fuck everything, marry what eva, and call yourself my equals, and know many that don`t want to either. Freedom is also being free to keep people away as well. Freedom is also a come as you are , fuck anyone willing, stick your cock in it, house party.

The church and State have nothing to do with it.

Wanna know why the whole world isn`t Gay,.......Cuz some people don`t like it......Live with it, but not like it is also freedom.

Let them be free, let them be Gay, but don`t let them get in your fucking way..........
Ok, so you hate gays, hate the government, hate 1st Amendment Rights, hate science and generally hate common sense.

And it sounds a lot like you hate protest. Yet here you are.... protesting.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
It doesn`t mean two shits if I or one believes in a book of fairy tales that no-one has died and came back to say it`s failed.

The incentive was not a book in the Bible either.

Religion or not, I think Gay behavior is horridly bad, inexcusable and not just foreplay kinky sex as they would like you to believe. I think it`s a personal thing people should keep in the bedroom ,.. the rainbow/Gay WTF people, all over the street make`n it a way of life don`t sit well with me.

I`m not living in the land of fuck everything, marry what eva, and call yourself my equals, and know many that don`t want to either. Freedom is also being free to keep people away as well. Freedom is also a come as you are , fuck anyone willing, stick your cock in it, house party.

The church and State have nothing to do with it.

Wanna know why the whole world isn`t Gay,.......Cuz some people don`t like it......Live with it, but not like it is also freedom.

Let them be free, let them be Gay, but don`t let them get in your fucking way..........
Wow, you really seem to think about gay sex ALOT...
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I think Gay behavior is horridly bad, inexcusable and not just foreplay kinky sex as they would like you to believe.
Why do you believe this?
I think it`s a personal thing people should keep in the bedroom ,.. the rainbow/Gay WTF people, all over the street make`n it a way of life don`t sit well with me.
To what extent? Gay people shouldn't hold hands in public? Do you extend that judgment to straight people as well? Do you not want to see anyone, straight or gay, holding hands in public? Or just not gay people?
I`m not living in the land of fuck everything, marry what eva, and call yourself my equals, and know many that don`t want to either. Freedom is also being free to keep people away as well.
What law says you're better than anyone else because of your sexual orientation that you swear is totally straight?
Wanna know why the whole world isn`t Gay,.......Cuz some people don`t like it......Live with it, but not like it is also freedom.
The whole world isn't gay for the exact same reason the whole world isn't left handed, or red haired, or green eyed.. or.. yeah, you get the picture.. Take any one of those other physical characteristics and substitute it for 'gay' in your absurd world view.. you are essentially discriminating against gay people for something on par with left hands, red hair and green eyes.. it's just dumb and as pointless as skin color. People who spend a couple seconds thinking about is reach the same conclusion.. Doesn't affect you.. you don't have the right to impose your beliefs. You guys are gonna have to learn how to deal with that..
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No.
Bible thumpers think because a book of fairy tales tells them gay people are bad, they somehow think it needs to be law. Up until the SC ruling, it was. That is not separation of church and state. My argument still stands.
Bible thumpers and government edict thumpers sometimes have alot in common don't they?

The bible thumper wants to use force to prevent people from marrying.

The government thumpers (you're in that camp) want to insist EVERYBODY, gays, straights etc. all MUST be equally oppressed and obtain government permission, which is just another form of force, to be married.


So silly you do not recognize your similarity to that which you say you oppose.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Ok, so you hate gays, hate the government, hate 1st Amendment Rights, hate science and generally hate common sense.

And it sounds a lot like you hate protest. Yet here you are.... protesting.

The only thing you got right is my dis like for Gay behavior. There is nothing you can say to change my mind,...it`s horrid behavior I want no part of. Try and fathom the fact not everyone is going to like everything,...then say to yourself,....it`s my right and within my freedom to do so. Just like them, I have Rights.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Why do you believe this?

To what extent? Gay people shouldn't hold hands in public? Do you extend that judgment to straight people as well? Do you not want to see anyone, straight or gay, holding hands in public? Or just not gay people?

What law says you're better than anyone else because of your sexual orientation that you swear is totally straight?

The whole world isn't gay for the exact same reason the whole world isn't left handed, or red haired, or green eyed.. or.. yeah, you get the picture.. Take any one of those other physical characteristics and substitute it for 'gay' in your absurd world view.. you are essentially discriminating against gay people for something on par with left hands, red hair and green eyes.. it's just dumb and as pointless as skin color. People who spend a couple seconds thinking about is reach the same conclusion.. Doesn't affect you.. you don't have the right to impose your beliefs. You guys are gonna have to learn how to deal with that..

1) Because it`s my choice to make.

2) To the extent that I do not allow it in my home or car or make exception.

3) No law say s I`m better, and no sentence I posted says that either. Why do you ask ? Is it because I refuse to allow Gay behavior to influence my life, or thrive in and around my livelihood ?

4) Discrimination is not illegal because it is essential. Gays are gonna have to learn to deal with that. Most importantly, I don`t need to explain my dislikes to you.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Bible thumpers and government edict thumpers sometimes have alot in common don't they?

The bible thumper wants to use force to prevent people from marrying.

The government thumpers (you're in that camp) want to insist EVERYBODY, gays, straights etc. all MUST be equally oppressed and obtain government permission, which is just another form of force, to be married.


So silly you do not recognize your similarity to that which you say you oppose.

You are whatever he judges you to be and called whatever he decides to call you, should you call him something, judge him, or disagree with him,...you are again whatever else he can think of.

Dude, don`t climb that tree,.....cut it down.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Bible thumpers and government edict thumpers sometimes have alot in common don't they?

The bible thumper wants to use force to prevent people from marrying.

The government thumpers (you're in that camp) want to insist EVERYBODY, gays, straights etc. all MUST be equally oppressed and obtain government permission, which is just another form of force, to be married.


So silly you do not recognize your similarity to that which you say you oppose.
No Robby. That's not at all what I am stating. I am stating that Bible thumpers use the bible as an excuse to pass laws that oppress. I am saying, in this instance to have less laws, therefore less government.

So sad you aren't able to recognize that.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
The only thing you got right is my dis like for Gay behavior. There is nothing you can say to change my mind,...it`s horrid behavior I want no part of. Try and fathom the fact not everyone is going to like everything,...then say to yourself,....it`s my right and within my freedom to do so. Just like them, I have Rights.
And round and round we go. Gays have a right to be married and go down the street with their colorful flags, however annoying it may be. Just as you have the right to protest and whine about them. Just as I have the right to call you a shit-stain for doing so. What you don't have the right to do is pass laws that oppress said peoples, that would be discriminatory.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
And round and round we go. Gays have a right to be married and go down the street with their colorful flags, however annoying it may be. Just as you have the right to protest and whine about them. Just as I have the right to call you a shit-stain for doing so. What you don't have the right to do is pass laws that oppress said peoples, that would be discriminatory.

So that means I have the Right to call a Gay a Faggot no matter how annoying it may be to them, as long as I let them buy at my store and rent from my estates.

What the Gay had the SCOTUS change was not a law, it was a stipulation that disqualified them from something they are not. Same sex marriage is not a man and a women.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
No Robby. That's not at all what I am stating. I am stating that Bible thumpers use the bible as an excuse to pass laws that oppress. I am saying, in this instance to have less laws, therefore less government.

So sad you aren't able to recognize that.

All laws oppress. You just like to be able to pick and choose where they come from.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
No Robby. That's not at all what I am stating. I am stating that Bible thumpers use the bible as an excuse to pass laws that oppress. I am saying, in this instance to have less laws, therefore less government.

So sad you aren't able to recognize that.
So why not get government out of being the decider of who can get married in the first place?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Some laws are in-just and not fair to the population. The Chicago gun ban has done nothing to curb black on black murders for whatever reason it happened. In fact, that law limits the populations security and ability to fight back against criminals with guns.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
So why not get government out of being the decider of who can get married in the first place?
Because as a Government, they can make incentives and lead, wich allows them to set qualifications for them and not all will qualify. If you wish to marry the way you want, don`t complain about being left out of other people`s incentives.......
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Some laws are in-just and not fair to the population. The Chicago gun ban has done nothing to curb black on black murders for whatever reason it happened. In fact, that law limits the populations security and ability to fight back against criminals with guns.
Laws that take away a peaceful persons right of self determination should be ignored. To oblige them emboldens more.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Because as a Government, they can make incentives and lead, wich allows them to set qualifications for them and not all will qualify. If you wish to marry the way you want, don`t complain about being left out of other people`s incentives.......
Free people do not have imposed leaders.

If you wish to use force to impose your ideals on another person, don't complain when they repel your initiated force with defensive force or ignore your edicts.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Free people do not have imposed leaders.

If you wish to use force to impose your ideals on another person, don't complain when they repel your initiated force with defensive force or ignore your edicts.

That`s fine. Please remember, to the victor go the spoils,...respect that or be branded.....
 
Top