You Have The "Religious Liberty" To Suck Baby Dicks

[desert dude]

i'm not the one holding my breath and stamping my feet about "sexual mutilation" which looks to be anything but.

also, you are a skinhead rat.

So, you think circumcised dicks are pretty, and uncircumcised dicks are not?

 

[AlecTheGardener]

I am sure both would be delicious in a sandwich. Unfortunately the top penis likely is less sensitive then the natural one.


Replace female with 'little baby boy:'
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation


In many African countries they force this upon their young women and girls, this sounds oddly familiar with curcumcising baby boys for non-medical reasons.

 

[UncleBuck]

So, you think circumcised dicks are pretty, and uncircumcised dicks are not?

a circumcised dick does not look mutilated to me, crybaby skinhead rat.

 

[desert dude]

I am sure both would be delicious in a sandwich. Unfortunately the top penis likely is less sensitive then the natural one.


Replace female with 'little baby boy:'
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation


In many African countries they force this upon their young women and girls, this sounds oddly familiar with curcumcising baby boys for non-medical reasons.

Don't know about the sandwich part, but the rest is spot on.

Circumcision of male infants is a sexual ritual handed down for thousands of years. Buck defends it because it's a Jewish tradition and because he thinks "dead babies belong in the garbage can".

Lots of Christians do it too.

 

[Rob Roy]

a circumcised dick does not look mutilated to me, crybaby skinhead rat.

Not every floor is your personal shit canvas Vincent Van Poo.

 

[desert dude]

Vincent Van Poo is a good one. The actual artist cut off his own ear. I wonder what Van Poo has severed?

 

[AlecTheGardener]

Don't know about the sandwich part, but the rest is spot on.

Circumcision of male infants is a sexual ritual handed down for thousands of years. Buck defends it because it's a Jewish tradition and because he thinks "dead babies belong in the garbage can".

Lots of Christians do it too.

Sometimes religious rites should not be allowed, when it harms a creature that cannot consent this should true.

Why not alter things so that the child can 'choose' when they are older after indoctrination/religious education, at the very least they get to consent. Let the child do it when they are a young man. The Masai do that, if you make it through that you really are a man.

http://www.circlist.com/rites/maasai.html

Again, they are indoctrinated, etc, but at least you can choose to run off into the bush and live like a hermit with your foreskin intact should you so choose.

 

[desert dude]

Sometimes religious rites should not be allowed, when it harms a creature that cannot consent this should true.

Why not alter things so that the child can 'choose' when they are older after indoctrination/religious education, at the very least they get to consent. Let the child do it when they are a young man. The Masai do that, if you make it through that you really are a man.

http://www.circlist.com/rites/maasai.html

Again, they are indoctrinated, etc, but at least you can choose to run off into the bush and live like a hermit with your foreskin intact should you so choose.

I totally agree. A conscious, consenting adult can do whatever they like with their own penis. Nobody should be allowed to amputate a baby boy's healthy, normal foreskin.

Europe is WAY ahead of the US in this bit of prehistoric sadism.

 

[Rob Roy]

Vincent Van Poo is a good one. The actual artist cut off his own ear. I wonder what Van Poo has severed?

 

[Harrekin]

Vincent Van Poo is a good one. The actual artist cut off his own ear. I wonder what Van Poo has severed?

Its believed Van Gogh never actually cut his own ear off, but he actually lost it in a gentlemans dispute but didn't want to rat the dude out.

 

[desert dude]

Its believed Van Gogh never actually cut his own ear off, but he actually lost it in a gentlemans dispute but didn't want to rat the dude out.

Seems a possibility. Buck lost his foreskin to mohel with big teeth.

 

[abandonconflict]

Seems a possibility. Buck lost his foreskin to mohel with big teeth.

Antisemitism...

So fascist.

 

[Harrekin]

Antisemitism...

So fascist.

Even if he is a facist, he still doesn't suck baby's dicks tho.

 

[abandonconflict]

Even if he is a facist, he still doesn't suck baby's dicks tho.

I'm not convinced of that.

 

[Harrekin]

I'm not convinced of that.

Fact of the matter is, sucking baby dicks is wrong.

Can we find that middle ground? ?

 

[abandonconflict]

Fact of the matter is, sucking baby dicks is wrong.

Can we find that middle ground? ?

Well no, maybe WE can find that if you get the baby cock out of your mouth.

 

[TBoneJack]

Damn, I can't really believe we're not just all agreeing that it's so wrong for a man to put a child's dick in his mouth, and then cut part of it off.

 

[racerboy71]

Damn, I can't really believe we're not just all agreeing that it's so wrong for a man to put a child's dick in his mouth, and then cut part of it off.

i agree, i'm kind of shocked at some of the responses tbh..

 

[UncleBuck]

he thinks "dead babies belong in the garbage can".

you got a better place?

 

[UncleBuck]

Nobody should be allowed to amputate a baby boy's healthy, normal foreskin.

you are aware that there is a difference between amputation and circumcision, right?

or are you one of those deluded rend pawl fanbois who refers to hepatitis B vaccinations, which are transmitted via a needle, as a "sexually transmitted disease"?

your dishonest language gives you away every time, skinhead rat.