Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
No it's not. There is nothing wrong with gay people or the sex they have, and the fact that the majority of Americans agree with that is what upsets you

Because two consenting adults share feelings, they get to share government incentives, yep

You wouldn't know the definition of marriage if it bit your bigoted self in the ass

Marriage was defined by ancient tribal leaders, even in biblical teachings, for millennia before your bigoted ass came along. Why are you trying to redefine marriage as one man one woman? Why are you trying to break biblical tradition that we've had for thousands of years?

But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a man and woman. Gays feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a man and woman. Gays feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that.
"But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a white man and a white woman. Blacks feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that."
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
No it's not. There is nothing wrong with gay people or the sex they have, and the fact that the majority of Americans agree with that is what upsets you

Because two consenting adults share feelings, they get to share government incentives, yep

You wouldn't know the definition of marriage if it bit your bigoted self in the ass

Marriage was defined by ancient tribal leaders, even in biblical teachings, for millennia before your bigoted ass came along. Why are you trying to redefine marriage as one man one woman? Why are you trying to break biblical tradition that we've had for thousands of years?

I can find just as many people who agree with you as disagree with you,...so there is merit.

Second sentence, our difference. I don`t have to share your opinion.

As to your last paragraph, What did they conclude? Why does that matter with the Federal Marriage incentive ?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
"But in the Government incentive, it is clearly defined as a white man and a white woman. Blacks feel left out and want in,...and to change the incentive to include them. Sorry, I got a problem with that."

No it is not. It is written Man and Woman. There is no mention of skin color because it has no relative significance. Until you came along.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I can find just as many people who agree with you as disagree with you,...so there is merit.

Second sentence, our difference. I don`t have to share your opinion.

As to your last paragraph, What did they conclude? Why does that matter with the Federal Marriage incentive ?
No you can't. People who oppose federally recognized gay marriage are a small minority in America, something in the 20% range, people who support it is pushing the 70% range

You're bitching about changing the "traditional definition of marriage" while trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage... Irony at its best
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
No you can't. People who oppose federally recognized gay marriage are a small minority in America, something in the 20% range, people who support it is pushing the 70% range

You're bitching about changing the "traditional definition of marriage" while trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage... Irony at its best

Again, the traditional definition, (you have yet to describe) has no barring on the United States definition when it comes to Federal incentives.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Again, the traditional definition, (you have yet to describe) has no barring on the United States definition when it comes to Federal incentives.
If it has no bearing, then why are you complaining about me "trying to change the traditional definition of marriage" while you're trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage as outlined by the motherfucking bible, bitch?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
If it has no bearing, then why are you complaining about me "trying to change the traditional definition of marriage" while you're trying to change the actual traditional definition of marriage as outlined by the motherfucking bible, bitch?

Because you are trying to impose that traditional marriage definition that you still have not stated upon me. The text is written for me, not them, but now,...it has to change,...maybe, cry louder or something....say you`re equal some more, they are listening.

When you get your way, should they write another, will you cry again ?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Because you are trying to impose that traditional marriage definition that you still have not stated upon me. The text is written for me, not them, but now,...it has to change,...maybe, cry louder or something....say you`re equal some more, they are listening.

When you get your way, should they write another, will you cry again ?
Jiberish. Learn English, the American language!

Your opposition makes the supreme court decision that much more juicy! I love that fucks like you hate it! I hope you feel it, deep down, philosophically!

The world is telling you to go fuck yourself
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
but you could have just as easily chosen a dude?


Butt didn`t. Wouldn`t have kids to love and support. You know, somebody gotta like women or all man becomes extinct.

It`s either stay with nature or become test tube parentless sheep. I don`t want your mom named Pyrex....
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Jiberish. Learn English, the American language!

Your opposition makes the supreme court decision that much more juicy! I love that fucks like you hate it! I hope you feel it, deep down, philosophically!

The world is telling you to go fuck yourself

Sooo, about that traditional biblical definition ??
 
Top