Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

[Rob Roy]

the constitution.

Good one. Now you're a comedian?

 

[UncleBuck]

I follow a non harming path too.

what's the least harmful way to kick someone out of a store based on their skin color?

 

[UncleBuck]

Good one. Now you're a comedian?

the cops haven't laughed when i've cited it, they've given up on their attempts to search my house or automobile without probable cause.

has worked every time so far.

 

[Rob Roy]

yeah, why don't you go ahead and fail to cite that claim of yours once again.

Plessy v Ferguson 1896

 

[UncleBuck]

Plessy v Ferguson 1896

pertained to public institutions like schools, not privately owned stores.

try again and fail again since you're repeating a lie to support your false premises, spaMBLA.

 

[Rob Roy]

what's the least harmful way to kick someone out of a store based on their skin color?

The least harmful way is for an event like that not to happen in the first place.

That could happen one of two ways.

1) A person interacts with another person because they know the other person is okay with it.

2) The other way would be for a person not to force an interaction if they know the other person is not okay with it.


How would you treat somebody that you didn't want to associate with, yet the person was willing to use force to make the interaction happen?

 

[Rob Roy]

pertained to public institutions like schools, not privately owned stores.

try again and fail again since you're repeating a lie to support your false premises, spaMBLA.

I'm being lazy now and you'll have to ask in crayon, then maybe I will answer your silliness.

 

[UncleBuck]

The least harmful way is for an event like that not to happen in the first place.

you didn't answer the questions.

a black person walks into a store and peacefully offers the store owner $5 in exchange for some bread and cold cuts.

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm being lazy now and you'll have to ask in crayon, then maybe I will answer your silliness.

like i said, you can't cite your claim because it is demonstrably false.

we've been over this before but you seem to think that repeating the same lie will make it true, like goebbels.

 

[Rob Roy]

you didn't answer the questions.

a black person walks into a store and peacefully offers the store owner $5 in exchange for some bread and cold cuts.

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

Why is the black person trying to buy cold cuts? Can't they be trying to buy high grade steak or lobster? What are you a racist or something?

 

[UncleBuck]

Why is the black person trying to buy cold cuts? Can't they be trying to buy high grade steak or lobster? What are you a racist or something?

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

 

[Rob Roy]

like i said, you can't cite your claim because it is demonstrably false.

we've been over this before but you seem to think that repeating the same lie will make it true, like goebbels.

 

[Rob Roy]

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

Could you tell him the bathroom is closed, that a guy named Uncle Buck had just been there and "had an accident" ?

I think that might be believable...what do you think?

 

[UncleBuck]

i don't see a single law pertaining to kicking black people out of stores based on skin color, which you say makes us less free as a nation if we can't do so.

 

[UncleBuck]

Could you tell him the bathroom is closed, that a guy named Uncle Buck had just been there and "had an accident" ?

I think that might be believable...what do you think?

why can't you answer?

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

 

[Rob Roy]

i don't see a single law pertaining to kicking black people out of stores based on skin color, which you say makes us less free as a nation if we can't do so.

No, you say that. I never said kicking a person out of a store due to their race was a good thing. I think it is stupid.

I've maintained that people interacting on a consensual basis is a good thing and if one party, in particular a property owner, wants to control their property in ways you or I wouldn't, we should simply leave them alone.

If they try to control OUR property that is a different story isn't it?

 

[Rob Roy]

why can't you answer?

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

Let him use the bathroom after you visited....that ought to do it.

 

[UncleBuck]

I never said kicking a person out of a store due to their race was a good thing.

yet you argue for it constantly and said that we are less free as a nation if we can't do so.

Any one that owns property prior to the government usurping their property rights was made less free. .

see? you said it right there. civil rights made us less free according to you.

 

[UncleBuck]

Let him use the bathroom after you visited....that ought to do it.

why can't you answer a simple question about how your supposedly peaceful, non-coercive method works?

so what's the least harmful way to kick him out of that store based on his skin color?

answer the question, racial separatist.

 

[Rob Roy]

yet you argue for it constantly and said that we are less free as a nation if we can't do so.



see? you said it right there. civil rights made us less free according to you.

No. I SAID property owners that had THEIR rights usurped were less free.

Also, I've never argued for a particular action on the part of a property owner, other than to say as long as they remain on their property it's not up to me to force them to do anything.

I can (and do) wish people did not discriminate based on race, but I also wish people did not force others to associate with them if the other person prefers not to. You ignore the force you advocate. I reject it.