Well that's interesting.
imo it is racisit for a white owned corporations (which are the majority) to go into ingenious lands around the globe and steal the people's resources. These sources range from water in Peru, to oil in the middle east. The corporations know what they are doing, they know they are hurting the people, but yet use force to opress the people.
We also see sexism in these oppressive tactics, women of color (and children) are the one that work the factories.
So yes racism is used by the corporations. As for my Kkk comment and corporations, well obviously probley not true, but i wouldn't doubt it.
Look at the connection of Coca-Cola and nazi germeny
OK, agreed by me. I was questioning this last night whether it was racial bias or racism going on. Its racism. Here's a link to a study that UB referred to, I include the link because I'm going to quote from it:
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/capideas/spring03/racialbias.html
"By isolating elements of the resumes in this fashion, the authors can attribute the 50 percent lower callback rate for African-American applicants to name manipulation. While the cost of sending additional resumes might not be large, this gap can be substantial in relation to the rate of new job openings.
The results suggest a significant amount of discrimination in this first stage of the job recruiting process."
This study doesn't prove racism. Where I connect it to racism is in
@NewtoMJ 's post where he says "But if Dante has proven to produce double the profit as Darren, I guarantee green trumps white and black.". If businesses indeed choose and hire candidates that they think will boost profits the most, then they are favoring people with white sounding names because they think that a person with this name/color will boost profits more. This is not bias, this is racism. And it does hurt people.
People that run these corporations do know what they are doing.
