Chester da Horse
Well-Known Member
Hi everyone
I am not invested in this defoliation technique in any way. I am on my first grow and have zero relevant experience. BUT from growing other plants and as bonsai, it is clear that removing leaves can stunt/redirect growth.
There was a character by the name of OscarleGrouch who had a rather convincing (if not rigorously designed) quasi-scientific experiment posted here last year that was closed. It was the closest thing to a relevant controlled trial I have seen (not blinded or randomised) but it was controlled, examining the defoliation technique - http://rollitup.org/t/effect-of-defoliation-on-yield-skywalker-og-indoor-scrog.827202/
Why was it shat on by everyone, and where did the result go?
The simple explanation of 'allowing light to reach lower buds and help them develop' is clearly fallacy - but how can anyone here definitively say there is not another mechanism by which defoliation can alter yield beneficially in an ARTIFICIALLY LIT, INDOOR grow situation? If a plant redirects growth to generate more fan leaves that are closer to the light source and hence receiving adequate PAR watts compared to poorly illuminated (due to inverse square law) or senescent (and possibly inefficient) lower leaves, may it possibly produce more photosynthate and hence more produce?
I am simply seeking knowledge, I have read the input on many of these similar threads by the vocal and clearly experienced (naysayer) growers out there. I respect your opinions, but am yet to be convinced either way.
I am not invested in this defoliation technique in any way. I am on my first grow and have zero relevant experience. BUT from growing other plants and as bonsai, it is clear that removing leaves can stunt/redirect growth.
There was a character by the name of OscarleGrouch who had a rather convincing (if not rigorously designed) quasi-scientific experiment posted here last year that was closed. It was the closest thing to a relevant controlled trial I have seen (not blinded or randomised) but it was controlled, examining the defoliation technique - http://rollitup.org/t/effect-of-defoliation-on-yield-skywalker-og-indoor-scrog.827202/
Why was it shat on by everyone, and where did the result go?
The simple explanation of 'allowing light to reach lower buds and help them develop' is clearly fallacy - but how can anyone here definitively say there is not another mechanism by which defoliation can alter yield beneficially in an ARTIFICIALLY LIT, INDOOR grow situation? If a plant redirects growth to generate more fan leaves that are closer to the light source and hence receiving adequate PAR watts compared to poorly illuminated (due to inverse square law) or senescent (and possibly inefficient) lower leaves, may it possibly produce more photosynthate and hence more produce?
I am simply seeking knowledge, I have read the input on many of these similar threads by the vocal and clearly experienced (naysayer) growers out there. I respect your opinions, but am yet to be convinced either way.
Last edited: