HUCKABEE 2016!!!

[TBoneJack]

We need a new constitutional amendment: no one named "Newt" is allowed to serve in any capacity of federal government.

 

[UncleBuck]

We need a new constitutional amendment: no one named "Newt" is allowed to serve in any capacity of federal government.

you're not fooling anyone, murdoch.

 

[ginwilly]

Nothing is more entertaining than a religious wacko pretending to be reasonable for a profit.

You should leave the good Reverends Sharpton and Jackson out of it. They don't count. You are also not allowed to criticize either of these two for using religion for fame, profit and station, it's OK for them.

 

[UncleBuck]

You should leave the good Reverends Sharpton and Jackson out of it. They don't count. You are also not allowed to criticize either of these two for using religion for fame, profit and station, it's OK for them.

racist loser.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm OBVIOUSLY fooling you, asshole.

No idea who murdoch is.

keep trying to convince yourself, murdoch.

because you're not convincing me.

 

[Observe & Report]

 

[kelly4]

Savages.

 

[UncleBuck]

"I'm Rubber Youre Glue..." ~You

lets review

cheezedick makes bigoted statements which you not only fail to "call him out on", but actually "Like"

i say "That's Racist!!", cuz it actually IS Racist, and bigoted, and completely non-substantive.
really, are you both so inept that you cant find ANYTHING Hickabee has ever said that you can point to and criticize? you gotta scream about his race, his age, and his religion???
yeah, i guess you really are that pathetic

you responded with:



which is in fact the exact same "Race Realism" bullshit that bigots use to deflect accurate assertions that their actual racism is in fact bigotry.
thats the sort of shit one can find on "stormfront" (as you well know...)

conclusion:
youre a bigoted little shit
and nobody is at all shocked by this revelation.

talk about a meltdown. and so factually challenged.

it was londonfog (not cheesus) who commented on the types of people that would vote for huckabee (not huckabee himself). neither i nor london made any comments about huckabee's race age or religion and i actually did a list a quote of his which only requires pointing and laughing (not even criticism).

so besides getting every single fact wrong, including the non-relevant ones, your analysis is dead on.

 

[Dr Kynes]

talk about a meltdown. and so factually challenged.

it was londonfog (not cheesus) who commented on the types of people that would vote for huckabee (not huckabee himself). neither i nor london made any comments about huckabee's race age or religion and i actually did a list a quote of his which only requires pointing and laughing (not even criticism).

so besides getting every single fact wrong, including the non-relevant ones, your analysis is dead on.

what do you know! it wasnt Duke Anthony, it was londonfart.

my apologies to cheezedick for this horrible mistake

the comment is still unrepentant bigotry, you still slapped a "like" on it, and still think that you can use bigotry to fight bigotry.

you (and the rest of the lefty shills in this thread) still remain so incompetent that you must attack huckabee as a person rather than for any of his MANY foolish policies.

the "quote" you edited, removed from it's context and splashed around like it was something shocking was in fact nothing but tone deafness, and you deliberately implied there was some racist connotation simply because you cant argue against someone's position, even when it's as pathetic and laughable as huckabee's.

shit, i can think of a great many of his policies that would ensure i could never vote for him, and he is supposed to be on MY SIDE.

but attacking his actual positions would require you take a position of your own, one you might have to defend, and that's too risky for a turd like yourself.

much better to make snide allusions, exercise your (apparently exclusive) right to be a hugely racist bigot, sling racial slurs (in a good cause of course...) and perhaps, if your pattern holds true, dump more gay porn and malware links.

 

[UncleBuck]

what do you know! it wasnt Duke Anthony, it was londonfart.

my apologies to cheezedick for this horrible mistake

the comment is still unrepentant bigotry, you still slapped a "like" on it, and still think that you can use bigotry to fight bigotry.

you (and the rest of the lefty shills in this thread) still remain so incompetent that you must attack huckabee as a person rather than for any of his MANY foolish policies.

the "quote" you edited, removed from it's context and splashed around like it was something shocking was in fact nothing but tone deafness, and you deliberately implied there was some racist connotation simply because you cant argue against someone's position, even when it's as pathetic and laughable as huckabee's.

shit, i can think of a great many of his policies that would ensure i could never vote for him, and he is supposed to be on MY SIDE.

but attacking his actual positions would require you take a position of your own, one you might have to defend, and that's too risky for a turd like yourself.

much better to make snide allusions, exercise your (apparently exclusive) right to be a hugely racist bigot, sling racial slurs (in a good cause of course...) and perhaps, if your pattern holds true, dump more gay porn and malware links.

nice try, still 100% factually wrong.

london made a comment about the types that vote for huckabee. said nothing about his age, race, or religion.

we understand you're finely tuned to perceived anti-white bigotry, seeing as how you categorize your beliefs using the exact same language that white supremacists use to name their groups, but it's just not there you dumb racist fuck.

and i did point out a huckabee position, replete with racist "uncle sugar" dog whistle and massive sexism.

once again, besides being completely wrong on all points, your analysis is spot on.

loser.

 

[Dr Kynes]

london made a comment about the types that vote for huckabee. said nothing about his age, race, or religion.

 

[desert dude]

We need a new constitutional amendment: no one named "Newt" is allowed to serve in any capacity of federal government.

How about National Salamander?

 

[UncleBuck]

kkkynes, what's up with your :i'm totally not racist" outreach attempts these last few days?

don't you think it's a little late for that after the whole "rushton is great", "niggers are like that everywhere", "european cultural superiority", "defend real america from multiculturalism", "denial of service never caused blacks any harm", "in da streetz", "black african retrograde cultures" spree you went on for the last several years?

 

[Dr Kynes]

"rushton is great",

still not apologizing for citing a Peer Reviewed Paper, which was anything but racist. unles you can figure out how "low IQ scores in africa are mainly caused by chronic malnutrition (cretinism) so we should send them food" is racist.
he is only "racist" in your addled little mind.

"niggers are like that everywhere",

never said that, your creative editing doesnt fool anyone.

"european cultural superiority",

facts is facts.

"defend real america from multiculturalism",

Context.
but in your world it's only important when youre trying to explain why the head of the USDA, Obama's preacher, Bill Ayers, Al Sharpton and Barry Seotoro arent racist.

"denial of service never caused blacks any harm",

never said that. never even implied it.

"in da streetz",

quoting a quote is racist now.
if i quote a black intellectual describing his own kid as appearing to be a "Mulatto" does that make me racist?
of course it does.
having a ginger cat instead of a black one makes me racist too.

"black african retrograde cultures"

Facts is Facts.

nice actual "meltdown" though, your butthurt is exquisite.[/QUOTE]

 

[UncleBuck]

he is only "racist" in your addled little mind.

didn't he frequently speak for American Renaissance?

didn't he speak for a conference whose stated purpose was to "defend america's european identity and judeo christian heritage from islam, immigrants, and blacks"?

didn't he run the pioneer fund, a eugenicist's wet dream, which also funded self-admitted white supremacist jared taylor's little white power group?

none of that is racist at all?

never said that, your creative editing doesnt fool anyone.

yeah, it gets tiresome to add those two extra quotes.

but when someone asked you "what's up with the niggers around here?", you did respond that "[niggers] are like that everywhere".

totally not racist though.

facts is facts.

fun fact: american renaissance was founded by self admitted white supremacist jared taylor
fun fact: the white supremacists who post over there also adhere to "european cultural superiority"

so is it just coincidence that you came to the exact same terminology as white supremacists?

Context.

please expound on the totally not racist context in which you said we have to defend "REAL AMERICA" from "the multicultural wasteland of bullshit" then.

never said that. never even implied it.

yes you did. here it is.

tell me, did the denial of service to blacks in the south before civil rights cause harm?

nope.

and any who say it did are bitching about FEELS not economics.

i don't know why you feel the need to lie outright about these easily verifiable things.

maybe your previous denial was a lie that you forgot to catalogue and track.

i'm sure when someone lies as blatantly and continuously as you do, it gets difficult to accurately account for all the lies.

 

[overgrowem]

Just another clown getting into the little car.

 

[Dr Kynes]

didn't he frequently speak for American Renaissance?

didn't he speak for a conference whose stated purpose was to "defend america's european identity and judeo christian heritage from islam, immigrants, and blacks"?

didn't he run the pioneer fund, a eugenicist's wet dream, which also funded self-admitted white supremacist jared taylor's little white power group?

none of that is racist at all?

dont you frequent Stormfront, and Niggermania?
didnt you spend half of last year screaming "Mudshark" at every opportunity?
didnt you just "like" a post that was 100% pure bigotry, despite ample opportunities to attack huckabee on his ISSUES?
didnt you defend those bigoted racist remarks by stating "those are statements of fact" (which is called "race realism" on stormfront)?
none of that is racist at all?

yeah, it gets tiresome to add those two extra quotes.

but when someone asked you "what's up with the niggers around here?", you did respond that "[niggers] are like that everywhere".

totally not racist though.

Context.
but it's only important when your trying to weasel out of your own racism.

fun fact: american renaissance was founded by self admitted white supremacist jared taylor
fun fact: the white supremacists who post over there also adhere to "european cultural superiority"

so is it just coincidence that you came to the exact same terminology as white supremacists?




please expound on the totally not racist context in which you said we have to defend "REAL AMERICA" from "the multicultural wasteland of bullshit" then.

evnen funner fact : the democrat party founded as a party of slaveholding, remained adamantly pro-slavery for 70 years, then after failing to seced, the democrat dominated states established some "race realist" policies, and maintain them till the 60's.

whoops.

yes you did. here it is.

Context.
in a discussion of a very specific type of harm (economic) your narrative fails.
hurt feels dont matter.

i don't know why you feel the need to lie outright about these easily verifiable things.

maybe your previous denial was a lie that you forgot to catalogue and track.

i'm sure when someone lies as blatantly and continuously as you do, it gets difficult to accurately account for all the lies.

riiiight.

and yet you still expose yourself as a racist and bigot in this very thread, without qualification, till you tried to weasel out of your own statements.

Racist.

 

[UncleBuck]

didnt you just "like" a post that was 100% pure bigotry

how is it "100% pure bigotry" to state that old, white, christians will vote for huckabee?

that's a fact.

it's like saying minorities will vote for [insert democrat here].

Context.
but it's only important when your trying to weasel out of your own racism.

what is the totally non-racist context behind your statement that "[niggers] are like that everywhere"?

evnen funner fact : the democrat party founded as a party of slaveholding, remained adamantly pro-slavery for 70 years, then after failing to seced, the democrat dominated states established some "race realist" policies, and maintain them till the 60's.

whoops.

trying to change the subject while omitting the last 50 years of history is pretty pathetic, even for you.

i will ask you again: is it just coincidence that you use the exact same terminology and beliefs as white supremacists?

Context.
in a discussion of a very specific type of harm (economic) your narrative fails.
hurt feels dont matter.

so are you saying that denial of service to blacks never caused any harm?

are you saying that having to face higher prices, less selection, and greater barriers never caused blacks any harm, economic or otherwise?

please clarify, you are literally all over the place.

you said you never even implied that. then i showed you answering a hard to mistake "nope" in direct response to that very question.

you are aware that people can see what you are writing, right? they can see you being trapped in your very own web of lies as we speak, right?

 

[Dr Kynes]

how is it "100% pure bigotry" to state that old, white, christians will vote for huckabee?

that's a fact.

it's like saying minorities will vote for [insert democrat here].




what is the totally non-racist context behind your statement that "[niggers] are like that everywhere"?



trying to change the subject while omitting the last 50 years of history is pretty pathetic, even for you.

i will ask you again: is it just coincidence that you use the exact same terminology and beliefs as white supremacists?



so are you saying that denial of service to blacks never caused any harm?

are you saying that having to face higher prices, less selection, and greater barriers never caused blacks any harm, economic or otherwise?

please clarify, you are literally all over the place.

you said you never even implied that. then i showed you answering a hard to mistake "nope" in direct response to that very question.

you are aware that people can see what you are writing, right? they can see you being trapped in your very own web of lies as we speak, right?

responding to your bullshit is a full time job, too bad unlike yourself, i already got a job.

all i gotta say is Context.

in a discussion of "economic harm" you squirt out some bullshit about "any harm" which includes the irrelevant Feels based nonsense that is your only line of attack.

how can anyone argue about your hurt Feels?

and since you have made your Feels the measure of everything, you get to be the arbiter of what is or is not racist, what words can and cannot be said, and what ideas are allowed.

that's Intolerance, and Bigotry.

maybe you should figure out how your hurt Feels creates a condition where screaming racist slurs is ok, because youre being racist for a good cause.

all the creative editing in the world wont turn me into a racist, no matter how fervently you wish it were so.

so imma let you squawk till you turn blue in the face.

 

[UncleBuck]

responding to your bullshit is a full time job, too bad unlike yourself, i already got a job.

all i gotta say is Context.

in a discussion of "economic harm" you squirt out some bullshit about "any harm" which includes the irrelevant Feels based nonsense that is your only line of attack.

how can anyone argue about your hurt Feels?

and since you have made your Feels the measure of everything, you get to be the arbiter of what is or is not racist, what words can and cannot be said, and what ideas are allowed.

that's Intolerance, and Bigotry.

maybe you should figure out how your hurt Feels creates a condition where screaming racist slurs is ok, because youre being racist for a good cause.

all the creative editing in the world wont turn me into a racist, no matter how fervently you wish it were so.

so imma let you squawk till you turn blue in the face.

wow, not even gonna try to defend your obvious flip flopping and racism anymore, eh?

if i were in your position, i wouldn't either. and i would hope that the thread dies into oblivion so no one sees my obvious idiocy and lies.

i guess we just don't understand the context behind your racism.