nonamedman420
Well-Known Member
i do have more than 1 light source. have another 300 watt led, uses less obviously. has uv and ir in it. also another small led in the mail, 23x3w red and blues for boost. thanks man. i didn't give every single bit of info about the room when i initially posted, it was only because i wanted a lil input along what u said. nobody seemed to see what i was saying, but u and az guy. i had a few problems i was trying to fix and i did.Also, if you read up and you have a higher than average IQ I expect you will come to the conclusion that you want more than 1 light type for best results. Each wavelength range has a different impact on the plants. Reds = flower, Cool/Blue = veg/stock size, UVB = resin stimulation.
Without the proper mix you create a bottleneck.
BTW ive had it for 3 nights now and my plants seriously are happier. can't explainnn it easily, but they love the light even if nobody else does. only light im using is the new one... for now. i actually have the 300 on a timer for the 1st hr and last hr of 12/12 due to that panel having uv and ir. if they end up needing the extra light, i have it. the only thing i can say for sure is, i'm not having heat trouble, i'm using less electricity, and my plants are responding favorably to the change in light. they're NOT stretching, their color is looking nicer, and they're reaching nicely up towards the light, not droopy at all like i was experiencing with the hps due to having to keep the lap higher away from canopy due to high leaf temps. for my situation, i know my choice was solid and does what i wanted it to do.
I cannot fathom how someone can say in one breath that the lights get cheaper and better every year, but in the very next breath they tell me to blow a bunch of $ on something i don't want just because it may or may not be more efficient than what i chose. my argument was, why blow my wad on something that in one year, when i planned on upgrading, i would be able to get the equivalent of what they promoted for considerably less... maybe even better for less. out of pocket, this light cost me about $50. i guarantee i save that and a ton more in the next year on less electricity and no hps lamp replacement. nobody can tell me my choice was bad, it might not be their choice, but i am not them, they're not me, and we all have different wants and needs. my needs were met, cheaply, and some people wanna shit on my head to make themselves feel better about their expensive purchases. it would go up their ass sideways if they found out they could get %80 of their lights quality for 20% of what they paid for their light. should i spend 4x as much $ on a light that's only lets say 20 % more efficient? no. that's why currently, hybrid cars don't save people any money, unless they drive the car for about 30 years lol. same can be said about top of the line lights, next year cheaper will be better. maybe i buy 2 instead of their 1. might be somewhat less efficient, but the bud sure smokes good
Last edited: