ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
You are the ultra troll.I am a troll and a hacker. I am all up in your webcam. I think you are sexy. I swing both ways.
I also lie a lot.
I am in awe
I Can't Breathe..I Can't Breathe..I Can't Breathe..I Can't Breathe..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
I am in awe
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Because of your second account. Which you just used 10 mins ago.
to answer you.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the federal law is invalid since there is NO LAW regarding cannabis
the federal "Law" in question is the Controlled Substances Act, which created a new federal entity with no foundation in the constitution, and the congress then delegated powers which the congress DID NOT HAVE (as per supreme court rulings) to that new entity
that new entity declared by fiat that cannabis was forbidden, using the legislation that created the agency as the basis for the congress' delegation of powers the congress never had, to regulate commerce through a tortured reading of the "commerce clause"
hence cannabis is also not "illegal" even on a federal level, it is "regulated" and possessing cannabis is prohibited by that regulation, so the actual charge is violating the CSA, not having a doobie.
every actual law the congress drafted to prohibit cannabis was struck down by the supreme court, hence the need to create a new agency to abuse a newfound power, which cant be overturned by the supreme court without toppling the applecart on numerous other (claimed) "good" provisions in that law
meanwhile there are a series of laws specifically prohibiting loitering, street busking, street peddling, selling of black market cigarettes, and resisting arrest.
california has no "rules" on "concentrates" that i am aware of, and since i grow and smoke my own, any "concentration" i may or may not be doing is a non-issue.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
delusional retard has meltdown. full story at 11.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
congress violated the constitution, but thats nothing new, they do it all the time.
but that's lawless.
so then why have they been saying all week that obama using EO is lawless?
seems to me it's congress breaking the law.
the president has every right, like his predecessors.
OOHWEE --- Dude you're a fucking pot head. Stating nonsense over and over doesn't change a fucking thing.
Suggestion, Google Cali busts for pot this year; then get on the vistors list of the unlucky victims; visit them and tell them there's no such thing as a federal mandate re the "ganja"!
Fucking idiot!
See if NORML can help you out re the Cali laws!
Maybe this phrase will ring a bell; "The Law is The Law"
I was right, your an Idiot to the end!
They don't need to be sued --- it was a terrible accident. A policy change and training to prevent these situations.
Having said that, I'm sure big bucks will be paid to lots of deserving lawyers.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
it should be pretty easy for you to locate the federal legislation that specifically prohibits possession or use of cannabis.
but ill save you the trouble:
it's all regulations and goes right back to the additional regulations of the CSA, the ONLY basis in "Law" for cannabis prohibition not yet nullified by the supreme court.
you might wanna google the difference between "Legislation" (laws) and "Regulation" (declarations by fiat from a regulatory agency)
also, just to be a dick, "You're" is a contraction of "You Are", while "Your" is a possessive pronoun.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
got it pot head!
Btw, what part of Cali are you in?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
The One is drafting memos instructing LEO's to NOT enforce the laws as writ, which bypasses congress' actual duty.
congress' failure to do their duty on the cannabis issue does not give The O-Man the power to rewrite the existing laws on immigration to suit his preferences.
if i break the speed limit on my way to work, that doesnt give Governor Moonbeam the right to have sex with my cat.
Last edited:
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member