Look.....just for accuracy - you're wrong.
I've never blamed Obama for starting "this entire fiasco". I do, however, fault him as a failed president who has led this country to it's weakest position in history economically, militarily, and socially.
FOX News partisan - moi? Here's what I said back on page 8:
"[ FoxNews - The O'Reilly Factor ]. Tune in tonight as he says they'll show documented evidence that criminal pot 'gangs' are stronger now in CO than before the legal changes there. He's been on this soapbox for months. I'm a regular viewer, and agree with some points of view / disagree on others."
Partisan = 'agree w/ some / disagree w/ others'? Hmmm, a very 'liberal' interpretation....lol. There's more:
"I'm not an O'Reilly flag-waver, btw - his is just the show that came up."
[page 9]
"Word. Both [Hannity and O'Reilly] basically use their guests as props, and will talk over them in a second if they start making a positive case the host disagrees with. #1 complaint. I'd love to see Hannity canned. Dude hurts his own causes. FWIW - O'Reilly's report on black market pot dealers in CO was seriously lame."
How does a partisan advocate firing one of the faces of the network, and refer to another's viewpoint as 'seriously lame' ?
On page 16, I said this to you:
"As a post discussion note: disagreements among friends - even strenuous one - only end weak friendships. [ argue
that ]"
to which you replied: "Can't argue that. Well said"
I say all that, to say this: I'll not follow you into taking a personal angle in these 'conversations'. I can, and will, agree or disagree with what you and others I respect say, and limit it to the viewpoint, without personal slights and sneers. I'm cool that way.
BTW - here's another quote from you, regarding the 'fiasco':
"I honestly don't know what the answer is.." [page 15]
Answers, to you, don't seem anywhere near as important as blaming the U S, Bush, and FOX News. Just an observation, friend.