Our lawless president

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I'm sorry I care not to read this whole thread, so can anyone just brief me on what President Obama has done that is so lawless...or is this just another " I hate Obama so much" thread
Click to expand...
He bogarted joints and didn't pass it over to his friends quick enough.....impeachable offense.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
so you have nothing either...not surprised
Click to expand...
Changing laws by executive fiat is contrary to "faithfully executing". The constitution is really pretty simple reading.

http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/faithfully-executed-clause/
Article II, Section 3 of the U.S Constitution is known as the faithfully executed clause. It provides that the President should take care that the laws are carried out faithfully. It says “ the president shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.”
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Changing laws by executive fiat is contrary to "faithfully executing". The constitution is really pretty simple reading.

http://definitions.uslegal.com/f/faithfully-executed-clause/
Article II, Section 3 of the U.S Constitution is known as the faithfully executed clause. It provides that the President should take care that the laws are carried out faithfully. It says “ the president shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.”
Click to expand...

you racist hypocrite.

history doesn't cease to exist because you are angry and racist and hypocritical.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2006/05/09/13837/penalties-waived-for-low-income.html

Penalties waived for low-income seniors who miss Medicare signup
BY TONY PUGH

Knight Ridder NewspapersMay 9, 2006

WASHINGTON—With pressure mounting to extend next Monday's enrollment deadline for the Medicare prescription-drug benefit, the Bush administration took another small step in that direction Tuesday, waiving penalty fees for very low-income seniors and people with disabilities who sign up late.






the archives on RIU go back to may 2006, so i expect to see a whole bunch of threads calling for bush's impeachment due to a similar executive action changing the law by "executive fiat".

get going, desertsupremacist.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you racist hypocrite.

history doesn't cease to exist because you are angry and racist and hypocritical.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2006/05/09/13837/penalties-waived-for-low-income.html

Penalties waived for low-income seniors who miss Medicare signup
BY TONY PUGH

Knight Ridder NewspapersMay 9, 2006

WASHINGTON—With pressure mounting to extend next Monday's enrollment deadline for the Medicare prescription-drug benefit, the Bush administration took another small step in that direction Tuesday, waiving penalty fees for very low-income seniors and people with disabilities who sign up late.






the archives on RIU go back to may 2006, so i expect to see a whole bunch of threads calling for bush's impeachment due to a similar executive action changing the law by "executive fiat".

get going, desertsupremacist.
Click to expand...
So, all you have in your debating arsenal is, "Well, Bush did it so it must be right!" I didn't know you were a BushHitler devotee.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
So, all you have in your debating arsenal is, "Well, Bush did it so it must be right!" I didn't know you were a BushHitler devotee.
Click to expand...
are you saying that there are ZERO posts in our archives where righties like you were similarly upset about george w bush delaying a law's implementation by "executive fiat"?

:lol:

that would make you a fucking hypocrite, wouldn't it now?
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
are you saying that there are ZERO posts in our archives where righties like you were similarly upset about george w bush delaying a law's implementation by "executive fiat"?

:lol:

that would make you a fucking hypocrite, wouldn't it now?
Click to expand...
I don't know what is in the archives of RIU, but I would be quite surprised if there weren't posts by Libertarians condemning Bush for all manner of things.

I am saying that you are a useless propagandist with Obama's swollen glans blocking your airway. The only pleasure I get from this is all the wailing that you and the rest of the progs will spew when the next iteration of imperial presidency, this time Republican, bends you over and takes something you value.

We all lose in this game, except the poor, impoverished Clintons. Why, Chelsea has tried her absolute best but she "just can't care about money". That chinless fuji sure didn't fall far from the tree, did she?
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Obama: "I'll act on my own on immigration"

Yeah, dipshit, you acting on your own is what got us 50,000 children from Central America spilling across the border.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
I don't know what is in the archives of RIU, but I would be quite surprised if there weren't posts by Libertarians condemning Bush for all manner of things.
Click to expand...
yet you can't and won't find a single one.

why?

because you righties are racist hypocrites, plain and simple.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yet you can't and won't find a single one.

why?

because you righties are racist hypocrites, plain and simple.
Click to expand...
Because I can't be bothered to engage in your stupidity.

Go drop a turd in a public bathroom. It will be funny, in a demeaning to working people, progressive sort of way.

Good night.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Ron Reagan had to cooperate with Congress
Bill Clinton had to work with Congress

This President had a totally Democrat Congress when he came in.

Why were these initiatives not even taken up? They could have passed a lot of things but they tap danced into the next election, with the ACA tax.

Then they complain about the lack of cooperation.

The American People turned the House against him by supporting the Tea Party.

I have disgust for all of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top