The forbidden TRUTH

[Ceepea]

Okay lol I'm waiting to see this evidence LOL! I watched your video, and because creatures are made of some of the same material (flesh) (and protein matter LOL) proves nothing of your theory that bacteria are literally growing into humans. There is absolutely no proof or anything that suggest this. You have looked for forty pages to try to disprove things I have said but have failed. You offer no Evidence, just a video of a old man talking about plants. You base your proof off from you think GOD can't make creation. That's all you think despite 40 pages over evidence pleading with you to turn to prayer so you can have personal experiences. You claim you are a logical thinker but provide no answers to anything. With no evidence of your theory then when someone comes along telling you something you cannot prove wrong, and explains everything with pages of evidence with no contradictions and a eye witness testimony you choose to follow something with no explanation of anything or any evidence. The only thing that you keep saying is that GOD can't make things and be Omnipotent because no one else can.
Well behold GOD can make and destroy, was and always will be. The beginning and the End Alpha and Omega. Fear GOD

Considering you believe this bacteria becoming people theory which claims science but has no scientific proof or any evidence or even suggestions yet you chose to believe this cult trend from what sounds like a bad sci fi movie, with more holes then describable, have you stopped to think you only believe something that makes zero sense and explains nothing, and don't do your research on the topic because you are running away from acknowledge GOD?
So you picked a group that just tries to ignore GOD and GOD's Laws, no matter how long you choose to live without acknowledgment of GOD, I assure you the topic will not disappear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent#Vestigial_structures

One of the strongest evidences for common descent comes from the study of gene sequences. Comparative sequence analysis examines the relationship between the DNA sequences of different species,[1] producing several lines of evidence that confirm Darwin's original hypothesis of common descent. If the hypothesis of common descent is true, then species that share a common ancestor inherited that ancestor's DNA sequence, as well as mutations unique to that ancestor. More closely related species have a greater fraction of identical sequence and shared substitutions compared to more distantly related species.

The simplest and most powerful evidence is provided by phylogenetic reconstruction. Such reconstructions, especially when done using slowly evolving protein sequences, are often quite robust and can be used to reconstruct a great deal of the evolutionary history of modern organisms (and even in some instances of the evolutionary history of extinct organisms, such as the recovered gene sequences of mammoths or Neanderthals). These reconstructed phylogenies recapitulate the relationships established through morphological and biochemical studies. The most detailed reconstructions have been performed on the basis of the mitochondrial genomes shared by all eukaryotic organisms, which are short and easy to sequence; the broadest reconstructions have been performed either using the sequences of a few very ancient proteins or by using ribosomal RNA sequence.

Phylogenetic relationships also extend to a wide variety of nonfunctional sequence elements, including repeats, transposons, pseudogenes, and mutations in protein-coding sequences that do not result in changes in amino-acid sequence. While a minority of these elements might later be found to harbor function, in aggregate they demonstrate that identity must be the product of common descent rather than common function.

Universal biochemical organisation and molecular variance patterns

 

[Ceepea]

Universal biochemical organisation and molecular variance patterns
All known extant (surviving) organisms are based on the same biochemical processes: genetic information encoded as nucleic acid (DNA, or RNA for many viruses), transcribed into RNA, then translated into proteins (that is, polymers of amino acids) by highly conserved ribosomes. Perhaps most tellingly, the Genetic Code (the "translation table" between DNA and amino acids) is the same for almost every organism, meaning that a piece of DNA in a bacterium codes for the same amino acid as in a human cell. ATP is used as energy currency by all extant life. A deeper understanding of developmental biology shows that common morphology is, in fact, the product of shared genetic elements.[2] For example, although camera-like eyes are believed to have evolved independently on many separate occasions,[3] they share a common set of light-sensing proteins (opsins), suggesting a common point of origin for all sighted creatures.[4][5] Another noteworthy example is the familiar vertebrate body plan, whose structure is controlled by the homeobox (Hox) family of genes.

DNA sequencing
Comparison of the DNA sequences allows organisms to be grouped by sequence similarity, and the resulting phylogenetic trees are typically congruent with traditional taxonomy, and are often used to strengthen or correct taxonomic classifications. Sequence comparison is considered a measure robust enough to correct erroneous assumptions in the phylogenetic tree in instances where other evidence is scarce. For example, neutral human DNA sequences are approximately 1.2% divergent (based on substitutions) from those of their nearest genetic relative, the chimpanzee, 1.6% from gorillas, and 6.6% from baboons.[6][7] Genetic sequence evidence thus allows inference and quantification of genetic relatedness between humans and other apes.[8][9] The sequence of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, a vital gene encoding a part of the ribosome, was used to find the broad phylogenetic relationships between all extant life. The analysis, originally done by Carl Woese, resulted in the three-domain system, arguing for two major splits in the early evolution of life. The first split led to modern Bacteria and the subsequent split led to modern Archaea and Eukaryotes.

Some DNA sequences are shared by very different organisms. It has been predicted by the theory of evolution that the differences in such DNA sequences between two organisms should roughly resemble both the biological difference between them according to their anatomy and the time that had passed since these two organisms have separated in the course of evolution, as seen in fossil evidence. The rate of accumulating such changes should be low for some sequences, namely those that code for critical RNA or proteins, and high for others that code for less critical RNA or proteins; but for every specific sequence, the rate of change should be roughly constant over time. These results have been experimentally confirmed. Two examples are DNA sequences coding for rRNA, which is highly conserved, and DNA sequences coding for fibrinopeptides (amino acid chains that are discarded during the formation of fibrin), which are highly non-conserved.[10]

 

[Ceepea]

There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that supports the theory of evolution, that's why it's universally accepted in the scientific community.

I've posted but a fraction of it.

 

[ghostdriver]

Universal biochemical organisation and molecular variance patterns
All known extant (surviving) organisms are based on the same biochemical processes: genetic information encoded as nucleic acid (DNA, or RNA for many viruses), transcribed into RNA, then translated into proteins (that is, polymers of amino acids) by highly conserved ribosomes. Perhaps most tellingly, the Genetic Code (the "translation table" between DNA and amino acids) is the same for almost every organism, meaning that a piece of DNA in a bacterium codes for the same amino acid as in a human cell. ATP is used as energy currency by all extant life. A deeper understanding of developmental biology shows that common morphology is, in fact, the product of shared genetic elements.[2] For example, although camera-like eyes are believed to have evolved independently on many separate occasions,[3] they share a common set of light-sensing proteins (opsins), suggesting a common point of origin for all sighted creatures.[4][5] Another noteworthy example is the familiar vertebrate body plan, whose structure is controlled by the homeobox (Hox) family of genes.

DNA sequencing
Comparison of the DNA sequences allows organisms to be grouped by sequence similarity, and the resulting phylogenetic trees are typically congruent with traditional taxonomy, and are often used to strengthen or correct taxonomic classifications. Sequence comparison is considered a measure robust enough to correct erroneous assumptions in the phylogenetic tree in instances where other evidence is scarce. For example, neutral human DNA sequences are approximately 1.2% divergent (based on substitutions) from those of their nearest genetic relative, the chimpanzee, 1.6% from gorillas, and 6.6% from baboons.[6][7] Genetic sequence evidence thus allows inference and quantification of genetic relatedness between humans and other apes.[8][9] The sequence of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, a vital gene encoding a part of the ribosome, was used to find the broad phylogenetic relationships between all extant life. The analysis, originally done by Carl Woese, resulted in the three-domain system, arguing for two major splits in the early evolution of life. The first split led to modern Bacteria and the subsequent split led to modern Archaea and Eukaryotes.

Some DNA sequences are shared by very different organisms. It has been predicted by the theory of evolution that the differences in such DNA sequences between two organisms should roughly resemble both the biological difference between them according to their anatomy and the time that had passed since these two organisms have separated in the course of evolution, as seen in fossil evidence. The rate of accumulating such changes should be low for some sequences, namely those that code for critical RNA or proteins, and high for others that code for less critical RNA or proteins; but for every specific sequence, the rate of change should be roughly constant over time. These results have been experimentally confirmed. Two examples are DNA sequences coding for rRNA, which is highly conserved, and DNA sequences coding for fibrinopeptides (amino acid chains that are discarded during the formation of fibrin), which are highly non-conserved.[10]

Did you not read this?
Everything you just posted states that the body of humans and creatures have the ability to be acclimated which was the starting point of darwins theory. There is no proof that human beings come from bacteria or any creature ever. I'm sure you got excited at this misleading presentation but read what you posted. Your'e saying that I said animals and human beings flesh are not similar, they are very similar in someways but our soul is nothing like theirs. I'm not asking you to prove survival of the fittest ether, which this mentions, or how animals belonging to the same gene pool can mate with other animals making adaptions to their body. All dogs and cats are mixed breeds, and different nationalities have different traits skin, eyes, face ect. That change based on your partner in your gene pool. Our skin and body also will become more resilient to sun, or weather the longer we endure it. GOD's creation is awesome. Darwins theory is that this proves his theory. I already knew this. I know what your religion believes, this is what you think of as holy scripture. Now where is the proof that
germs=Human beings
and germs= made creation matter and light
and germs made germs or germs have always been.
I will begin to ask you questions knowing the answer to prove your religion is wrong if you want me too. But you said you have proof I know what you think but I want your proof. This is like a islam man posting Qu'ran saying "this this is proof!" I would tell him the same thing i'm telling you this isn't proof this is your theory I already knew your blasphemous cult theory. I would then ask for proof again so where is all your proof you speak of? (asking knowing the answer because I am a witness of GOD) Then if you want I can begin to ask you questions ( knowing the answers) to have you realize the irrational and obscure view your'e being tricked into.

 

[Ceepea]

Did you not read this?
Everything you just posted states that the body of humans and creatures have the ability to be acclimated which was the starting point of darwins theory. There is no proof that human beings come from bacteria or any creature ever. I'm sure you got excited at this misleading presentation but read what you posted. Your'e saying that I said animals and human beings flesh are not similar, they are very similar in someways but our soul is nothing like theirs.

What does a soul do? How can you show a soul exists? It doesn't regulate behaviour, that's what the brain does. It doesn't make decisions, that's what the brain does.

I'm not asking you to prove survival of the fittest ether, which this mentions, or how animals belonging to the same gene pool can mate with other animals making adaptions to their body. All dogs and cats are mixed breeds, and different nationalities have different traits skin, eyes, face ect. That change based on your partner in your gene pool.

Random mutations via offspring are how evolution works. For example, most humans were allergic to dairy not more than a few thousand years ago.

Our skin and body also will become more resilient to sun, or weather the longer we endure it. GOD's creation is awesome. Darwins theory is that this proves his theory.

Not at all. Modern evolution is based off far more than Darwin's theory, that was just the first hypothesis, lol. We have insurmountable evidence in support of evolution.

I already knew this. I know what your religion believes, this is what you think of as holy scripture. Now where is the proof that
germs=Human beings
and germs= made creation matter and light
and germs made germs or germs have always been.

I don't think you can comprehend what billions of years is like. There's no shame in it, it's hard to scale it in human terms. Yes, humans cam e from simpler life forms. It's exceptionally well documented.

I will begin to ask you questions knowing the answer to prove your religion is wrong if you want me too. But you said you have proof I know what you think but I want your proof. This is like a islam man posting Qu'ran saying "this this is proof!" I would tell him the same thing i'm telling you this isn't proof this is your theory I already knew your blasphemous cult theory.

You ask for proof but can't understand the answer. lol Your current level and understand of science makes you incapable of undertanding the concepts you're arguing about.

I would then ask for proof again so where is all your proof you speak of? (asking knowing the answer because I am a witness of GOD) Then if you want I can begin to ask you questions ( knowing the answers) to have you realize the irrational and obscure view your'e being tricked into.

I wish I could laugh at you in person.

 

[Ceepea]

Insect mouthparts
Many different species of insects have mouthparts derived from the same embryonic structures, indicating that the mouthparts are modifications of a common ancestor's original features. These include a labrum (upper lip), a pair of mandibles, a hypopharynx (floor of mouth), a pair of maxillae, and a labium. (Fig. 5b) Evolution has caused enlargement and modification of these structures in some species, while it has caused the reduction and loss of them in other species. The modifications enable the insects to exploit a variety of food materials.

Other arthropod appendages
Insect mouthparts and antennae are considered homologues of insect legs. Parallel developments are seen in some arachnids: The anterior pair of legs may be modified as analogues of antennae, particularly in whip scorpions, which walk on six legs. These developments provide support for the theory that complex modifications often arise by duplication of components, with the duplicates modified in different directions.

Pelvic structure of dinosaurs
See also: Evolution of dinosaurs and Evolution of birds
Similar to the pentadactyl limb in mammals, the earliest dinosaurs split into two distinct orders—the saurischia and ornithischia. They are classified as one or the other in accordance with what the fossils demonstrate. Figure 5c, shows that early saurischians resembled early ornithischians. The pattern of the pelvis in all species of dinosaurs is an example of homologous structures. Each order of dinosaur has slightly differing pelvis bones providing evidence of common descent. Additionally, modern birds show a similarity to ancient saurischian pelvic structures indicating the evolution of birds from dinosaurs. This can also be seen in Figure 5c as the Aves branch off the Theropoda suborder.

 

[Ceepea]

Pentadactyl limb
Further information: Evolution of mammals
The pattern of limb bones called pentadactyl limb is an example of homologous structures (Fig. 5d). It is found in all classes of tetrapods (i.e. from amphibians to mammals). It can even be traced back to the fins of certain fossil fishes from which the first amphibians evolved such as tiktaalik. The limb has a single proximal bone (humerus), two distal bones (radius and ulna), a series of carpals (wrist bones), followed by five series of metacarpals (palm bones) and phalanges (digits). Throughout the tetrapods, the fundamental structures of pentadactyl limbs are the same, indicating that they originated from a common ancestor. But in the course of evolution, these fundamental structures have been modified. They have become superficially different and unrelated structures to serve different functions in adaptation to different environments and modes of life. This phenomenon is shown in the forelimbs of mammals. For example:

• In the monkey, the forelimbs are much elongated to form a grasping hand for climbing and swinging among trees.
• In the pig, the first digit is lost, and the second and fifth digits are reduced. The remaining two digits are longer and stouter than the rest and bear a hoof for supporting the body.
• In the horse, the forelimbs are adapted for support and running by great elongation of the third digit bearing a hoof.
• The mole has a pair of short, spade-like forelimbs for burrowing.
• The anteater uses its enlarged third digit for tearing down ant hills and termite nests.
• In the whale, the forelimbs become flippers for steering and maintaining equilibrium during swimming.
• In the bat, the forelimbs have turned into wings for flying by great elongation of four digits, while the hook-like first digit remains free for hanging from trees.
  
  Recurrent laryngeal nerve in giraffes
  The recurrent laryngeal nerve is a fourth branch of the vagus nerve, which is a cranial nerve. In mammals, its path is unusually long. As a part of the vagus nerve, it comes from the brain, passes through the neck down to heart, rounds the dorsal aorta and returns up to the larynx, again through the neck. (Fig. 5e)
  
  This path is suboptimal even for humans, but for giraffes it becomes even more suboptimal. Due to the lengths of their necks, the recurrent laryngeal nerve may be up to 4m long (13 ft), despite its optimal route being a distance of just several inches.
  
  The indirect route of this nerve is the result of evolution of mammals from fish, which had no neck and had a relatively short nerve that innervated one gill slit and passed near the gill arch. Since then, the gill it innervated has become the larynx and the gill arch has become the dorsal aorta in mammals.[57][58]
  

 

[Ceepea]

Evidence from paleontology


An insect trapped in amber.
When organisms die, they often decompose rapidly or are consumed by scavengers, leaving no permanent evidences of their existence. However, occasionally, some organisms are preserved. The remains or traces of organisms from a past geologic age embedded in rocks by natural processes are called fossils. They are extremely important for understanding the evolutionary history of life on Earth, as they provide direct evidence of evolution and detailed information on the ancestry of organisms. Paleontology is the study of past life based on fossil records and their relations to different geologic time periods.

For fossilization to take place, the traces and remains of organisms must be quickly buried so that weathering and decomposition do not occur. Skeletal structures or other hard parts of the organisms are the most commonly occurring form of fossilized remains (Paul, 199, (Behrensmeyer, 1980) and (Martin, 1999). There are also some trace "fossils" showing moulds, cast or imprints of some previous organisms.

As an animal dies, the organic materials gradually decay, such that the bones become porous. If the animal is subsequently buried in mud, mineral salts infiltrate into the bones and gradually fill up the pores. The bones harden into stones and are preserved as fossils. This process is known as petrification. If dead animals are covered by wind-blown sand, and if the sand is subsequently turned into mud by heavy rain or floods, the same process of mineral infiltration may occur. Apart from petrification, the dead bodies of organisms may be well preserved in ice, in hardened resin of coniferous trees (amber), in tar, or in anaerobic, acidic peat. Fossilization can sometimes be a trace, an impression of a form. Examples include leaves and footprints, the fossils of which are made in layers that then harden.

 

[Ceepea]

Fossil record


Fossil trilobite. Trilobites were hard-shelled arthropods, related to living horseshoe crabs and spiders, that first appeared in significant numbers around 540 mya, dying out 250 mya.
It is possible to find out how a particular group of organisms evolved by arranging its fossil records in a chronological sequence. Such a sequence can be determined because fossils are mainly found in sedimentary rock. Sedimentary rock is formed by layers of silt or mud on top of each other; thus, the resulting rock contains a series of horizontal layers, or strata. Each layer contains fossils typical for a specific time period when they formed. The lowest strata contain the oldest rock and the earliest fossils, while the highest strata contain the youngest rock and more recent fossils.

A succession of animals and plants can also be seen from fossil discoveries. By studying the number and complexity of different fossils at different stratigraphic levels, it has been shown that older fossil-bearing rocks contain fewer types of fossilized organisms, and they all have a simpler structure, whereas younger rocks contain a greater variety of fossils, often with increasingly complex structures.[60]

For many years, geologists could only roughly estimate the ages of various strata and the fossils found. They did so, for instance, by estimating the time for the formation of sedimentary rock layer by layer. Today, by measuring the proportions of radioactive and stable elements in a given rock, the ages of fossils can be more precisely dated by scientists. This technique is known as radiometric dating.

Throughout the fossil record, many species that appear at an early stratigraphic level disappear at a later level. This is interpreted in evolutionary terms as indicating the times when species originated and became extinct. Geographical regions and climatic conditions have varied throughout the Earth's history. Since organisms are adapted to particular environments, the constantly changing conditions favoured species that adapted to new environments through the mechanism of natural selection.

 

[Ceepea]

Mollies
The Shortfin Molly (Poecilia mexicana) is a small fish that lives in the Sulfur Caves of Mexico. Years of study on the species have found that two distinct populations of mollies—the dark interior fish and the bright surface water fish—are becoming more genetically divergent.[140] The populations have no obvious barrier separating the two; however, it was found that the mollies are hunted by a large water bug (Belostoma spp). Tobler collected the bug and both types of mollies, placed them in large plastic bottles, and put them back in the cave. After a day, it was found that, in the light, the cave-adapted fish endured the most damage, with four out of every five stab-wounds from the water bugs sharp mouthparts. In the dark, the situation was the opposite. The mollies’ senses can detect a predator’s threat in their own habitats, but not in the other ones. Moving from one habitat to the other significantly increases the risk of dying. Tobler plans on further experiments, but believes that it is a good example of the rise of a new species.[141]\

Polar bear
See also: Polar bear § Taxonomy and evolution and Grizzly–polar bear hybrid
A remarkable example of natural selection, geographic isolation, and speciation in progress is the relationship of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) and the brown bear (Ursus arctos). Once thought to be two entirely different species, recent evidence suggests that both bears can interbreed and produce fertile offspring. Molecular data gives estimates of a divergence time ranging from 70,000 to 1.5 million years ago. The oldest known fossil evidence of polar bears dates around 100,000 years ago. Scientists hypothesize that around 200,000 years ago (when the Arctic Ocean was entirely covered with ice and the earth was at its near-glacial maximum), glaciers isolated a population of brown bears (approximately 125,000 years ago) of which evolved over time adapting to their environment.[142] This process is known as allopatric speciation. The bears acquired significant physiological differences from the brown bear allowing the polar bear to comfortably survive in conditions that the brown bear could not. The ability to swim sixty miles or more at a time in freezing waters, to blend in with the snow, and to stay warm in the arctic environment are some of the adaptations of the polar bear. Additionally, the elongation of the neck makes it easier to keep their heads above water while swimming alongside the oversized webbed feet that act as paddles when swimming. The polar bear has also evolved small papillae and vacuole-like suction cups on the soles to make them less likely to slip on the ice alongside the fact that their feet have become covered with heavy matting to protect the bottoms from intense cold and to provide traction. They also have smaller ears for a reduction of heat loss, eyelids that act like sunglasses, accommodations for their all-meat diet, a large stomach capacity to enable opportunistic feeding, and the ability to fast for up to nine months while recycling their urea.[143][144] Despite all these differing traits, the two bear species have now been reunited due to the warming of the Arctic and the receding glaciers. Surprisingly, the bears can interbreed but Ursus maritimus is considered a subspecies of Ursus arctos. This example presents a macro-evolutionary change involving an amalgamation of several fields of evolutionary biology, e.g. adaptation through natural selection, geographic isolation, speciation, and hybridization.

 

[Ceepea]

If god designed humans, he did a really shitty job. An engineer could do a far better job....

It's almost as if we had to 'make due' with what we already had. Strange....

 

[ghostdriver]

Did you not see I replied to things exactly like this?

And Claiming all creatures are built for a certain way to swim, run, fly ect. is clearly proof of GOD not that bacteria are constantly trying to evolve into human beings and monkeys, elephants, giraffe, ect. lol this is a horrible blaspheme theory based on the noticing how animals are all built in a certain way to pertaining to how they live. So instead realizing GOD made everything the way it is for a reason stars, sun, earth temp, earth spin, ect. Your religion says "that's impossible you have never seen that happened so believe people and animals constantly evolve from bacteria and we don't know anything else but this is right we are positive, and even though there is no bacteria forming into creatures or humans or anything in which would EVER suggest this, we have no evidence at all for this idea, but because all the other options are wrong because we say science doesn't support that a being can create things, we haven't seen it." Yeah you haven't seen GOD. This isn't proof.




Here is post 804 again
Everything you just posted states that the body of humans and creatures have the ability to be acclimated which was the starting point of darwins theory. There is no proof that human beings come from bacteria or any creature ever. I'm sure you got excited at this misleading presentation but read what you posted. Your'e saying that I said animals and human beings flesh are not similar, they are very similar in someways but our soul is nothing like theirs. I'm not asking you to prove survival of the fittest ether, which this mentions, or how animals belonging to the same gene pool can mate with other animals making adaptions to their body. All dogs and cats are mixed breeds, and different nationalities have different traits skin, eyes, face ect. That change based on your partner in your gene pool. Our skin and body also will become more resilient to sun, or weather the longer we endure it. GOD's creation is awesome. Darwins theory is that this proves his theory. I already knew this. I know what your religion believes, this is what you think of as holy scripture. Now where is the proof that
germs=Human beings
and germs= made creation matter and light
and germs made germs or germs have always been.
I will begin to ask you questions knowing the answer to prove your religion is wrong if you want me too. But you said you have proof I know what you think but I want your proof. This is like a islam man posting Qu'ran saying "this this is proof!" I would tell him the same thing i'm telling you this isn't proof this is your theory I already knew your blasphemous cult theory. I would then ask for proof again so where is all your proof you speak of? (asking knowing the answer because I am a witness of GOD) Then if you want I can begin to ask you questions ( knowing the answers) to have you realize the irrational and obscure view your'e being tricked into.

 

[ghostdriver]

If god designed humans, he did a really shitty job. An engineer could do a far better job....

It's almost as if we had to 'make due' with what we already had. Strange....

No GOD did a unfathomably good and forever awesome job.(like GOD always does) Your body dies because you were born into sin, your a immortal being you will leave it soon I don't see how you can complain. Worship Creator and Saviour Procreate and be fruitful and hey... smoke a lot of weed lol

 

[Skuxx]

No GOD did a unfathomably good and forever awesome job.(like GOD always does) Your body dies because you were born into sin, your a immortal being you will leave it soon I don't see how you can complain. Worship Creator and Saviour Procreate and be fruitful and hey... smoke a lot of weed lol

quit trolling. anybody that denies evolution loses any possible credibility IMO....

 

[ghostdriver]

quit trolling. anybody that denies evolution loses any possible credibility IMO....

The Sabbath is from sunset Friday night until Sunday morning.
And if you have something to say about your religion, or anything that I have said, or questions don't hesitate to reply but your post wasn't saying anything except I don't believe you. Is there any specific why? Or is it just the typical darwin cult logic of not believing something is so awesome it can create matter, space, time, dimensions. Which isn't evidence of anything..remotely linked to their teachings of what the world, is and where you, and all things came from, and yet begin to explain anything remotely in the realm of a conscious thought.

 

[tyler.durden]

There are plenty of christians that understand and support evolution by natural selection, they simply need to say god created the process. Ghostdriver/Nevaeh doesn't even understand how evolution operates, yet he denies it. God and evolution are not mutually exclusive, but if one acts as if they are it could potentially save one from a lot of study He's what they refer to as, 'Not even Wrong'. He'd have a lot of reading to do to even get to the level of wrong. Great posts, BB, I was thinking about taking that effort but I'm just too tired lately. The more GD/N420 posts, the more he turns people away from his retarded dogma and stunted intellect. So far, he is doing the best job of discrediting christianity, and doesn't even realize it. That's good stuff...

 

[Nevaeh420]

GhostDriver, tell Tyler Durden that you are not Me/Nevaeh420.

GhostDriver doesnt even have a Christ complex like Myself. GbostDriver has a Bible complex, everything has to be factual from the Bible, is GhostDrivers mentality. Not My logic.

I am sick of Tyler Durden saying that I am GhostDriver.

GhostDriver, prove to TylerDurden that you are not Me.

Thanks.

~PEACE~

 

[Ceepea]

No GOD did a unfathomably good and forever awesome job.(like GOD always does) Your body dies because you were born into sin, your a immortal being you will leave it soon I don't see how you can complain. Worship Creator and Saviour Procreate and be fruitful and hey... smoke a lot of weed lol

Again, you don't understand what I'm saying. You don't understand what evolution is, so how could you possibly defend against my comments? It's sad.

Our wrist bones are weak, because we used to be on all fours. If we were designed to walk biped-ally, our arms would be designed much differently. Just one example....

 

[tyler.durden]

...I am sick of Tyler Durden saying that I am GhostDriver.

GhostDriver, prove to TylerDurden that you are not Me.

Thanks.

~PEACE~

Both personalities insist on spreading a false message that no one cares about among nothing but detractors. It's very masochistic, and it's enough proof for me...

 

[ghostdriver]

The local online community in this section of rollitup is very disturbing on all levels, Will you stop spamming the thread with childish behavior.