Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
you feed that every time you defend the right of racist to initiate racist aggression and hostility against blacks who simply want to buy what they're selling, you racist prohibitionist hypocrite.

Okay, let's assume a person wants to be left alone and doesn't want to associate with a particular person. The reason for not wanting to associate could be for any reason, let's say maybe there's a gerbil hanging out of the ass of the unwanted person.

Then the gerbil ass person insists that he or she WILL associate with the person that wants to be left alone. He goes to the place the disassociator has improved and is recognized as "owning". The owner makes it clear that the gerbil ass person is not wanted, yet the gerbil ass person insists on staying and brings a horde of other gerbil ass people with him despite the owner saying not to.

Who has initiated aggression? . The person seeking not to associate or the person forcing an association?




P.S. - It looks like there is something moving in the back of your pants.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
the racist prohibitionist hypocrite lives on land stolen from natives.

yet another example of his racist hypocrisy.

This is an interesting point. However the people the land was stolen from are all dead now. How should they be restituted?



We've had quite a back and forth haven't we? I've nearly been cyber punched in the face by an internet macho man and had to cry myself to sleep a couple of nights fearing your mightiness.

Yet in all the back and forth, you've not proven a thing.

My problem is with people that initiate aggression against others or their property. You seem okay with initiating aggression against the property of others. If I'm wrong, perhaps you could HOLD THE INSULTS FOR A BIT and explain how making a person use their property in ways they prefer not to is NOT aggression.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Voluntaryism:



Please give me a list of things that you believe can be owned and can't be owned so that we can proceed from there.

I'll gladly respond to your stick man cartoon when I know what it is that we are discussing or which point you are asserting.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Fucking propertarians only focused on what they can own.

Like a Farengi.
I think you have the capacity to respond with an intelligent argument rather than an emotional response.

Seeking to define terms and agree on what they mean has upset you? Hopefully your day will improve.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I think you have the capacity to respond with an intelligent argument rather than an emotional response.

Seeking to define terms and agree on what they mean has upset you? Hopefully your day will improve.
Rule of acquisition number 31,682: derail any discussion that aims to point out the deep seated greed ever present in your perspective.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Rule of acquisition number 31,682: derail any discussion that aims to point out the deep seated greed ever present in your perspective.
I originally liked this post, but there is no such rule.

The final rule, although unofficial is rule number 299 which states "After you've exploited someone, it never hurts to thank them. That way, it's easier to exploit them next time."

I bet you're not even a real Feranghi.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I originally liked this post, but there is no such rule.

The final rule, although unofficial is rule number 299 which states "After you've exploited someone, it never hurts to thank them. That way, it's easier to exploit them next time."

I bet you're not even a real Feranghi.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Okay, let's assume a person wants to be left alone and doesn't want to associate with a particular person. The reason for not wanting to associate could be for any reason, let's say maybe there's a gerbil hanging out of the ass of the unwanted person.

Then the gerbil ass person insists that he or she WILL associate with the person that wants to be left alone. He goes to the place the disassociator has improved and is recognized as "owning". The owner makes it clear that the gerbil ass person is not wanted, yet the gerbil ass person insists on staying and brings a horde of other gerbil ass people with him despite the owner saying not to.

Who has initiated aggression? . The person seeking not to associate or the person forcing an association?
let's do a more concrete example that goes specifically to what we are talking about.

a racist opens up a gas station and tells the public "come buy gas here".

a black guy goes to the gas station and says "i would like to buy some gas here".

the racist gets hostile and forcefully removes the black person from his property.

who initiated the aggression?

do i need to draw this in fucking crayon for you?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
let's do a more concrete example that goes specifically to what we are talking about.

a racist opens up a gas station and tells the public "come buy gas here".

a black guy goes to the gas station and says "i would like to buy some gas here".

the racist gets hostile and forcefully removes the black person from his property.

who initiated the aggression?

do i need to draw this in fucking crayon for you?
Like button.

You were right.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Like button.

You were right.
rob's entire philosophy depends on historical revisionism so severe that it is outright historical denialism.

he denies that those racist practices he defends endlessly caused harm.

how can anyone deny that those racist practices caused harm? they can't. but if your entire failed philosophy hinges on that simple little fact, you have to just block it out.

robroy is an old racist clown.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Rule of acquisition number 31,682: derail any discussion that aims to point out the deep seated greed ever present in your perspective.

My perspective is that you should be free to do what you want and be responsible for the consequences. You seem reluctant to give your perspective regarding what is acceptable to own and why.

Greed? How so? I do volunteer work on a regular basis.

I think it is greedy to try to run others lives via coercion. That's why I advocate consensual interactions. It would seem that greed is more apparent when some people want to redistribute things they have not put any labor into.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
rob's entire philosophy depends on historical revisionism so severe that it is outright historical denialism.

he denies that those racist practices he defends endlessly caused harm.

how can anyone deny that those racist practices caused harm? they can't. but if your entire failed philosophy hinges on that simple little fact, you have to just block it out.

robroy is an old racist clown.

Your method of refutation relies heavily on insults and is short on rebuttal and addressing questions. The fact is you CAN'T deny that you advocate the initiation of aggression in some instances against people that simply do not want to associate with others.

You've tried long and hard to dance away from that, but it is clearly your position. My position is people should not force themselves on others, your position is the opposite.

I do not defend racist practices that cause an actionable harm. I do not like racist beliefs as I find them ignorant. I think there is a significant difference between an act of wanting to disassociate and an act that forces association. You ignore those differences and run from discussion of it.

However a person can believe what they want to, even a racist and I will not try to stop them if they confine their idiocy to their own property. You, like a prohibitionist, think it is your job to use force and go to peoples property and make them do things they prefer not to do. That's the business model of the DEA.

I defend the idea that all people that own something have the right to control it as long as enjoying that control does not take away the right of another person from controlling things that they own. You like to build mountains of shit and try to plant my flag in it....that's because you're a weak debater.


If you want to be a master debater you should take the gerbil out and get some lubricant...focus on the man side of your torso and let go those funny feelings you have for small rodents.
 
Top