Red1966
Well-Known Member
See, problem gone! Absorbed by ocean. And you were worriedThe extra co2 we pump into the air is being absorbed by the oceans. This wasn't happening before we started burning fossil fuels at an exponential rate.
See, problem gone! Absorbed by ocean. And you were worriedThe extra co2 we pump into the air is being absorbed by the oceans. This wasn't happening before we started burning fossil fuels at an exponential rate.
i would love to see some citation of that.Humans contribute <3% of the co2 generated annually. So, no, not the main reason.
I put that in quotes for a reason.So you changed the statement and try to pretend it's still true even tho it says something different.
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/Actually, it WAS your opinion. No scientists are saying humans are the main contributor to global warming.
Yes they are. Dumbass.Scientists can now say with extreme confidence that human activity is the dominant cause of the global warming observed since the 1950s, a new report by an international scientific group said Friday.
Calling man-made warming "extremely likely," the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change used the strongest words yet on the issue as it adopted its assessment on the state of the climate system.
In its previous assessment, in 2007, the UN-sponsored panel said it was "very likely" that global warming was man-made.
It's not a blog. It's a report. Your blatant stupidity is getting tiresome.Quoting a political blog doesn't lend any credence to your claim.
so i took it upon myself to look for citation of red's claim that humans are responsible for less than 3% of CO2 emissions annually.i would love to see some citation of that.
Because it wasn't a quote?I put that in quotes for a reason.
your "less than 3%" claim comes from a blog funded by exxonmobil and the koch brothers.That you read on a blog.
Says 'political blogs' are harmful to credibility, while simultaneously using political blogs as his source.That you read on a blog. Yawn. Your basic theory is "everybody that doesn't defer to your opinion is a dumb ass". "Global warming" is no longer accepted. You have to call it "climate change" since the environment doesn't seem to be interested in following your predictions
Quote even one instance where I used a blog for a source. You can't. Yes, global warming caused unusually COLD weather last winter.Says 'political blogs' are harmful to credibility, while simultaneously using political blogs as his source.
Global warming is what causes climate change, btw.
You wonder why people think you're dumb?
Stahp!!!!!! with the logic!!!!! You're making too much sense.The loudest people on both sides of the issue are idiots, so anything productive happening is doubtful.
My evolution on the subject began with An Inconvenient Truth. I'm a believer, think ZOMG we better do something and immediately begin taking actions to reduce my carbon footprint. Especially in areas that made financial sense too.
I see the non-sensical measures being proposed and think oh shit, the idiots are trying to take advantage of the idiots, they are not at all concerned with solving anything. I see Al Gore really has no clue and was wrong way too many times to have any credibility. The loud idiots argued that Al Gore is not an idiot and the side loses even more credibility. I'm now a skeptic.
IPCC is shown to be shady as fuck, I'm not just a skeptic, I'm bordering on being a denier. The idiots argue that IPCC isn't shady as fuck making their argument even less credible.
I make an effort to understand the data that's available all over the place and I'm back to being a believer again.
The Journal of Science reports that all 104 or so (going by memory, if you care about exactly, look it up) studies they looked at overestimated when they predicted temps.The idiots argue this never happened. Now I'm in the camp that we need to figure out why our predictive models are wrong and let's fix them but we are still harming our planet, we just don't understand how much.
I'm going to make the argument like this. Ignore Gore, he's an unfortunate idiot, take him out of the equation. The IPCC is full of people that are shady as fuck but most of their science is solid. We are off on temps and need to know what that means.
In the mean time, stop polluting so much until we figure this shit out.
No, people who ignore evidence are stupid or have an agenda... or both.That you read on a blog. Yawn. Your basic theory is "everybody that doesn't defer to your opinion is a dumb ass". "Global warming" is no longer accepted. You have to call it "climate change" since the environment doesn't seem to be interested in following your predictions
You just demonstrated you don't know what global warming is. Congrats, asshat.Quote even one instance where I used a blog for a source. You can't. Yes, global warming caused unusually COLD weather last winter.
You wonder why people think you're dumb?
How has the IPCC shown to be "shady as fuck"?IPCC is shown to be shady as fuck, I'm not just a skeptic, I'm bordering on being a denier. The idiots argue that IPCC isn't shady as fuck making their argument even less credible.
Stop wasting time, put your money into fusion.Anyone seen those portable floating 'blimp' generators?
http://www.altaerosenergies.com/
Neat idea, harvesting the wind at 1000-2000 feet....
For all we know we might never have fusion energy. These sources actually exist in usable form.Stop wasting time, put your money into fusion.
Its quite literally the universe's source of powah.