Bill Nye owns Heritage retard on climate change

[UncleBuck]

Geez bigotty buck. Everyone including yourself who has ever been in the AGW threads know the predictions that were overestimated I'm talking about are temps. I'll admit that something may have been dug up since the journal of science pointed out that ALL 100 something predictions were wrong on the high side. But you sure as hell haven't shown any proof.

It's people like you that feed the fire to the deniers. You post arguments that get torn apart and then post them again like they are fact. Stop helping the cause, you are hurting it.

Doer is right, you've become incessantly boring. Isn't there a typo somewhere you can point out or call someone a racist you disagree with?

shouldn't you be apologizing for lying now instead of incessantly crying still?

here's 1990 just in case 1980 wasn't good enough for your lying ass.

 

[UncleBuck]

They go back and revise their predictions after the fact.

citation needed yet again, and you have a shit track record on providing those.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

if you had a leg to stand on, you wouldn't have to lie.

now would you like to admit to all the nice people here that you are lying, or should i post the predictions and the reality to prove what a shitty liar you are?

Yes, UB has precisely ONE prediction that had a markedly lower estimate that panned out to be close. He doesn't like to look at the cavalcade of "models" that were all laughably over on their results. You know, the ones the zealots like him paraded around as reality.

 

[ginwilly]

shouldn't you be apologizing for lying now instead of incessantly crying still?

here's 1990 just in case 1980 wasn't good enough for your lying ass.

why are you posting shit that stops at 2000 to prove that present day predictions are right? Are you simple?

 

[BigNBushy]

citation needed yet again, and you have a shit track record on providing those.

They don't cite their plagiarism.

I do have a Nat Geo, well it's at my parents house. It's from the late 90's.

Therein is an article saying that in 20 years the fabled 'northwest passage' will be a year round shipping lane.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes, UB has precisely ONE prediction that had a markedly lower estimate that panned out to be close. He doesn't like to look at the cavalcade of "models" that were all laughably over on their results. You know, the ones the zealots like him paraded around as reality.

you mean that "cavalcade" of models that you can't and won't cite over the course of months?



cry louder, baby.

 

[UncleBuck]

They don't cite their plagiarism.

if they revise their predictions, as you say, you should have no problem demonstrating it.

get to it, cupcake.

 

[UncleBuck]

why are you posting shit that stops at 2000 to prove that present day predictions are right? Are you simple?

why are you still crying instead of apologizing for lying?

 

[ginwilly]

why are you still crying instead of apologizing for lying?

Why am I wasting time on a simpleton bigot like you is a better question. I've seen this movie, you you are going to lie, misdirect and project your own character flaws onto anyone who engages you. Good luck with that.

 

[UncleBuck]

Why am I wasting time on a simpleton bigot like you is a better question.

you could provide citation, if you had it. but since you don't have it, you should just admit you are lying.

of course, you can carry on crying for my amusement, that's always an option.

i like how the guy who opposes civil rights and all but calls me a n***ger lover calls me a bigot. that's a sign of trolling success.

 

[ginwilly]

you could provide citation, if you had it. but since you don't have it, you should just admit you are lying.

of course, you can carry on crying for my amusement, that's always an option.

i like how the guy who opposes civil rights and all but calls me a n***ger lover calls me a bigot. that's a sign of trolling success.

We already went down this road where you accepted a challenge to leave for a month and then showed your lack of honesty and integrity by not following through. Why would you want to rehash that painfully embarrassing episode again for all to see?

Are you in some teenage troll club? That's the only thing that makes sense.

 

[UncleBuck]

We already went down this road where you accepted a challenge to leave for a month and then showed your lack of honesty and integrity by not following through. Why would you want to rehash that painfully embarrassing episode again for all to see?

Are you in some teenage troll club? That's the only thing that makes sense.

oh, you mean when you claimed that "WHY DO WE NEED TITLE II OF CIVIL RIGHTS?!?!" showcased your support for civil rights?

damn, you are one deluded fucker.

are you too stupid to just provide a citation, or does it not exist and you're just a liar?

 

[ginwilly]

You really need some new material. I'm jumping off your troll hook. I'm sure you'll catch someone else who thinks you actually believe what you write instead of just messing with people.

Your psychosis is a sad thing but a poor excuse for reveling in being the biggest troll on a pot forum. But hey, if that's the best you have to hope for in life then good on ya.

 

[UncleBuck]

You really need some new material. I'm jumping off your troll hook. I'm sure you'll catch someone else who thinks you actually believe what you write instead of just messing with people.

Your psychosis is a sad thing but a poor excuse for reveling in being the biggest troll on a pot forum. But hey, if that's the best you have to hope for in life then good on ya.

and still no citation from the sad guy.

still waiting on my 4chan army. i even got a warning from GWN in hopes of incurring their wrath.

 

[BigNBushy]

if they revise their predictions, as you say, you should have no problem demonstrating it.

get to it, cupcake.

They're in cahoots. All electronic records are washed.

Go get a hard copy of the literature from the late 90's. Have a good laugh at how bad their forecast was.

 

[UncleBuck]

They're in cahoots. All electronic records are washed.

Go get a hard copy of the literature from the late 90's. Have a good laugh at how bad their forecast was.

of course, you have no citation for any of this and we are just expected to take your word for it.

i'll pass.

 

[sheskunk]

You don't understand science. Attempting to explain this to you will be a waste of time.

If you're really interested in knowing the answer (you're not), go take a science class at a community college near you. Or do you believe education is all just liberal bias?

What I'd really like to know is "What exactly are you afraid of?"

 

[sheskunk]

I'd ask if you understand, but I already know the answer. You don't.



Greenhouse gas emissions are not uncontrollable. Considering that humans are the main factor, all humans need to do is stop being the main contributor.

The greenhouse gas emissions that happen WITHOUT human help, are uncontrollable. Not the gasses that we produce, those are very, very easily controllable.

And yet, they don't. And they won't. Deal with it. It's that simple. Learn to adapt, or die.

 

[Padawanbater2]

And yet, they don't. And they won't. Deal with it. It's that simple. Learn to adapt, or die.

What you fail to consider is the ecosystem of the planet. Humans will adapt, the plants, you know, our main food source and the main source of food to the meat we eat, won't. What do you think will happen when the environment creates longer droughts, stronger hurricanes and floods, shorter growing seasons and unstable conditions to grow food? There will be food shortages, and if you know anything about history, resource shortages always lead to a fight over control of those resources.

It's a lot more than "adapt, deal with it". That's why people like you aren't in charge of making decisions, that's why climate science continues to progress and advance, and why, despite your best efforts, in the end, you will lose. You'll kick and scream the entire way there, but it's inevitable. There's not a subject in history that such a vast majority of scientists were in complete agreement about.

Deal with that

Meanwhile... Heritage Valley retard think he gots a point becuz ya know.. hurricanes and stuff..

Comedy gold!

 

[sheskunk]

What you fail to consider is the ecosystem of the planet. Humans will adapt, the plants, you know, our main food source and the main source of food to the meat we eat, won't. What do you think will happen when the environment creates longer droughts, stronger hurricanes and floods, shorter growing seasons and unstable conditions to grow food? There will be food shortages, and if you know anything about history, resource shortages always lead to a fight over control of those resources.

It's a lot more than "adapt, deal with it". That's why people like you aren't in charge of making decisions, that's why climate science continues to progress and advance, and why, despite your best efforts, in the end, you will lose. You'll kick and scream the entire way there, but it's inevitable. There's not a subject in history that such a vast majority of scientists were in complete agreement about.

Deal with that

Meanwhile... Heritage Valley retard think he gots a point becuz ya know.. hurricanes and stuff..

Comedy gold!

That's my whole point. I'm not trying to "win" anything. I live my life to the best of my abilities and I am happy. I'm not kicking and screaming.

People will die. If I'm one of them, so be it. I can deal with that. It's a shame you're so scared that you can't lead a happy life. I feel sorry for those around you.