maybe he turned into a spammer? I always thought the potential thereI'll ask around. When there is a line through someone's name it means they're gone. Now that Defoliating issue will just keep on going instead of being debunked and put to rest.
neo, your point has been made and has some valid claim BUT its just doesn't mean that it works for every strain, everyone's technique, everyone's room application etc... But I will say burn one bro and be cool...It doesn't have to get too personal about the subject. I like Joe, we've seen differences in techniques and practices but overall, Joe is a really cool fellow. I can see a lot of merit in your posts, especially in regards to personal experience. If you have personally learned by trial and error, or comparison....I support that learning. Its great to learn from mistakes. teaches one better on why we make mistakes and how we can not do it again and grow on it. I learned my trade as an apprentice for 3 years, so I completely understand learning hands on by personal experience and experiment. Hope you don't take this the wrong way but I'm just trying to do 2 things. Agree with some of your practices in education experience and say hey, Joe is pretty cool and is good in my book bro. Hope all is growing well alwaysFirst he's telling me that he is going to stop me from giving my opinion on this forum, now he attacks a person that might not be here to defend himself.
Do I call you Uncle or Comrade, joe?
If in a side-by-side it turns out it didn't increase the yield then defoilators will claim it wasn't done right, at the wrong time or blame the strain. Even if the test was repeated with indicas, sativas and several hybrids a defoliator could claim it works only on hybrids that have a bud structure like sativas and leaves like indicas, or the other way around. I can think of several situations in which defoliation improves a situation that should have been avoided by proper plant spacing and/or climate control if max yield is the goal. Situations that don't occur in a grow from someone who could do a reliable side-by-side. I don't think this will ever be put to rest, at least not amongst hobbyists and amateurs.I'll ask around. When there is a line through someone's name it means they're gone. Now that Defoliating issue will just keep on going instead of being debunked and put to rest.
ur probably right about that. it will always be a point of contention. up there with flushing and the whole amber myth.^^lol
If in a side-by-side it turns out it didn't increase the yield then defoilators will claim it wasn't done right, at the wrong time or blame the strain. Even if the test was repeated with indicas, sativas and several hybrids a defoliator could claim it works only on hybrids that have a bud structure like sativas and leaves like indicas, or the other way around. I can think of several situations in which defoliation improves a situation that should have been avoided by proper plant spacing and/or climate control if max yield is the goal. Situations that don't occur in a grow from someone who could do a reliable side-by-side. I don't think this will ever be put to rest, at least not amongst hobbyists and amateurs.
Yeah, good example. A professor who spent decades on researching trichs ends up measuring the contents of trich heads and factually determines amber is degraded THC into CBN no less and still plenty of people who wait for 20-30% amber or even more.and the whole amber myth.
In your opinion when is the ideal harvest window? Sometimes when i start seeing amber on some strains the buds arent even looking "done" yet, you know what i meanYeah, good example. A professor who spent decades on researching trichs ends up measuring the contents of trich heads and factually determines amber is degraded THC into CBN no less and still plenty of people who wait for 20-30% amber or even more.
I pull when it looks done, I don't even look at the trichs. that's all a waste of my time. A grower who has grown long enough knows when the plant is finished.In your opinion when is the ideal harvest window? Sometimes when i start seeing amber on some strains the buds arent even looking "done" yet, you know what i mean
Yeah I know what you mean, that's why it's important to not just look at trichs. As long as the buds are still going there's no need to look at trichs (well, unless you got one that foxtails too long and you don't want the center bud to degrade). Once the calyxes are fully swollen and no new fresh white pistils are being created it's pretty much done. If at that point most trichs are cloudy (which will pretty much always be the case) I pull it. The result of the research of that professor (outlines in an article by Mel Frank in Hightimes, called A Time to Reap if I remember correctly. Kite_high (rip) posted a scan of the article here somewhere at RIU) wasn't just that amber is too far, when trichs start turning cloudy they are at peak THC ratios, when fully cloudy they are already degrading. The only legal medicinal grower in the netherlands pulls ssh after only 7 weeks.In your opinion when is the ideal harvest window? Sometimes when i start seeing amber on some strains the buds arent even looking "done" yet, you know what i mean
Continue on the slightly off topic theme, would you recommend harvesting in stages, as the tops of my scrog seem to be a week or so ahead of those a couple of inches down.Yeah I know what you mean, that's why it's important to not just look at trichs. As long as the buds are still going there's no need to look at trichs (well, unless you got one that foxtails too long and you don't want the center bud to degrade). Once the calyxes are fully swollen and no new fresh white pistils are being created it's pretty much done. If at that point most trichs are cloudy (which will pretty much always be the case) I pull it. The result of the research of that professor (outlines in an article by Mel Frank in Hightimes, called A Time to Reap if I remember correctly. Kite_high (rip) posted a scan of the article here somewhere at RIU) wasn't just that amber is too far, when trichs start turning cloudy they are at peak THC ratios, when fully cloudy they are already degrading. The only legal medicinal grower in the netherlands pulls ssh after only 7 weeks.
I imagine some early breeders and gurus told others to wait for x% amber as a rough method and that percentage increased (exaggerated) over the past decades as if it's desirable to have amber. If you had a certain % of amber (on the outer calyxes) you could be fairly sure no new trichs are being added and the majority is cloudy.
Unlike Chuck I do look at trichs, but like Chuck I don't really use them to actually determine the harvest day. I look more at the bud structure and calyx development: