We do grow in HS

rory420420

rory420420

Well-Known Member
youve seen my room..i def have enough light!lol..and the a.c.s can get turned off..i just would have a hard time getting a 60lb tank of gas to the grow..my days of lifting tanks are over!..i cant throw 350lbs on my back anymore..im old.
 
racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
the nice thing about modern photography and it being digital is you can shot a bunch of pix and not have to worry about 90% of them being shite now you don't have to pay to get them all developed.. really does help out a ton when you don't have to worry how many pix you take just to get that one good one today imvho..
 
MrEDuck

MrEDuck

Well-Known Member
It is very nice. I spent less than $2k on my camera setup. My wife had a few lenses but I was using the kit lens that came with my camera for these shots and I use it for 90%+ of my weed pics. I'm hoping to get a cheap macro lens for better closeups.
 
racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
MrEDuck said:
It is very nice. I spent less than $2k on my camera setup. My wife had a few lenses but I was using the kit lens that came with my camera for these shots and I use it for 90%+ of my weed pics. I'm hoping to get a cheap macro lens for better closeups.
Click to expand...
mind if i ask what lens that was mre? i got an upgraded lens for my canon, mines an 18 / 55, which is a wide angle, which is good for some stuff, but not great for close ups that i've noticed so far.. i still haven't messed around with it yet, but i plan to with the new grow. :D
 
MrEDuck

MrEDuck

Well-Known Member
The 28-135mm that was a kit lens with the EOS 50D. It takes reasonable pics but is not a god lens by any stretch of the imagination. When I got the camera it was fine but as my skills have developed it has become the limiting factor in my photography.
 
racerboy71

racerboy71

bud bootlegger
MrEDuck said:
The 28-135mm that was a kit lens with the EOS 50D. It takes reasonable pics but is not a god lens by any stretch of the imagination. When I got the camera it was fine but as my skills have developed it has become the limiting factor in my photography.
Click to expand...
yeah, this guy i used to skate board with back in the 80s has been into photog since back then, so i'm always trying to pick his brain w/e i get the chance too.. he's always saying.. "it's all about the glass",so yeah, lol..
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
image.jpg Half of the room finally switched all to hps. Day 4 12/12... Fed with more fish fertilizer and bat guano and added the magic vitazyme. Humidity 50% , temp 77 during day and 65 at night. Co2 15-1800 ppm.
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
MrEDuck said:
If you're runnign batches I'd say keep it on MH until the stretch is done.
Click to expand...
Really? So you should only run hps for a couple weeks then back to mh for the last couple weeks?......fuck man wtf am I doing ... Did I read somewhere to switch to hps during flower ? I think I make up shit in my head
 
MrEDuck

MrEDuck

Well-Known Member
Once they're actually flowering you want the red light of the HPS but during the stretch you want the blue of the MH to keep the node spacing smaller. Red light produces more flowers but also promotes stretchier growth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top