USCB Radical feminist porn professor goes nuts

[UncleBuck]

abortion, drugs and sex make baby jesus cry.

 

[greentrip]

Abortion is currently legal, Red said "a million and a half every year" is unacceptable, so I asked how many was acceptable, and pointed out that even if were illegal, women would still get illegal abortions, which leads to the question of if we should turn those women into criminals and have them undergo less safe procedures instead.

So making abortions illegal would be changing the law

What does what someone else does with their own body in the privacy of their own life have to do with anything but themselves? Why is this at all a societal matter? Why are conservatives so concerned with abortions, drugs, sex, etc? Things people do behind the privacy of closed doors? What does it matter?

It comes down to weather a person considers it a life or not.
Personally i think it starts at a certain date which is up for debate.
I will say that I like MOST Americans support some common sense restrictions not nessasarily a ban.
People like Obama who support 3rd trimester abortions and partial birth abortions
are in a very small minority in America. I consider there position radical and sick.

 

[Padawanbater2]

abortion, drugs and sex make baby jesus cry.

I feel like I live inside the Matrix sometimes..

 

[Padawanbater2]

It comes down to weather a person considers it a life or not.
Personally i think it starts at a certain date which is up for debate.
I will say that I like MOST Americans support some common sense restrictions not nessasarily a ban.
People like Obama who support 3rd trimester abortions and partial birth abortions
are in a very small minority in America. I consider there position radical and sick.

Pretty sure that's not what Obama supports

Why do you think it should be OK to give the government the power to tell people what to do in one instance (abortion), but not anything else, like drugs (I would hope)? Why is it OK to impose what you believe to be the moral position that not every other equal American might not also believe? Isn't the traditionally conservative position to be limited government?

 

[greentrip]

Pretty sure that's not what Obama supports

Your wrong

Why do you think it should be OK to give the government the power to tell people what to do in one instance (abortion) At a certain age a fetus becomes human. Because Amercians value life we must restrict
abortion to a degree it doesnt kill humans. we dont allow murders of adults either.
The majority of Americans share this opinion.

Why is it OK to impose what you believe to be the moral position that not every other equal American might not also believe?

I dont oppose anything. I vote for representatives (just like you) who then vote -Its called America
Some Americans probably suport things like baby rape etc the majority opinion and morality must over rule them
even though "not every other American might not also believe" as you put it

Isn't the traditionally conservative position to be limited government?
I am not a traditional conservative I am an independent. Are you suggesting we dont have laws to protect people?

 

[Padawanbater2]

Your wrong

Why do you think it should be OK to give the government the power to tell people what to do in one instance (abortion) At a certain age a fetus becomes human. Because Amercians value life we must restrict
abortion to a degree it doesnt kill humans. we dont allow murders of adults either.
The majority of Americans share this opinion.


I dont oppose anything. I vote for representatives (just like you) who then vote -Its called America
Some Americans probably suport things like baby rape etc the majority opinion and morality must over rule them
even though "not every other American might not also believe" as you put it

Isn't the traditionally conservative position to be limited government?
I am not a traditional conservative I am an independent. Are you suggesting we dont have laws to protect people?

Can you provide a source that says Obama supports 3rd trimester abortions?

Who gets to decide what age a fetus becomes a human? And using what basis?

Are you saying you agree with the "majority rule"? Whatever the most Americans believe is true, no matter what it is, should be the law?

I am suggesting we limit the laws we have to actually protecting people from other people, not "protecting people from themselves"

 

[Antidisestablishmentarian]

Well that's contradictory.

On one hand, we are supposed to follow majority rules regarding climate change(even though the vast majority is undecided, but you run with 97% anyways), but in this case it's: don't follow majority rules...

Consistency-it's a bitch

 

[Rob Roy]

so your answer is "no"? no harm caused, just indifference?

No. My answer is you did not ask the question properly. The circumstances can and did vary.

In some circumstances obviously blacks were harmed. That would be when somebody with a mindset similar to yours, a believer that some people can rule others, initiated aggression against them or their property.

In other situations, the answer would be no. A person is not harmed when another fails to associate with them. If you ask a girl out and she says no, do you make her go out with you ? Or do you understand that she owns herself and you shouldn't force your way onto her property? yes or no.

 

[Rob Roy]

he's not on the side of prohibition and criminalizing women for daring to exercise control over what happens to their own body, a concept you might know as "liberty" or "freedom".

When both sides of your mouth get going at once, do you ever drool? If you think people should have control over what is theirs, why do you also advocate against it?

 

[Red1966]

Abortion is currently legal, Red said "a million and a half every year" is unacceptable, so I asked how many was acceptable, and pointed out that even if were illegal, women would still get illegal abortions, which leads to the question of if we should turn those women into criminals and have them undergo less safe procedures instead. So making abortions illegal would be changing the law What does what someone else does with their own body in the privacy of their own life have to do with anything but themselves? Why is this at all a societal matter? Why are conservatives so concerned with abortions, drugs, sex, etc? Things people do behind the privacy of closed doors? What does it matter?

0 are acceptable. Abortions were never made legal. The laws banning them were declared "unconstitutional". Those woman are already criminals. We call them "murderers". Abortions aren't done in the privacy of home. It's not their body or life they are sacrificing, it's the child's. Why are liberals so concerned with abortions, drugs, sex, etc? Are you implying you can do anything if you hide it? It seems that way. Someday, perhaps, someone will invite you into their grow room to have a look at their crop. Once there, they will overpower you, tie you up, and begin the process of slowly chopping you into a slurry like material. You will be alive and conscious when this process begins. When they are finished this grisly task, they will vacuum up the mess and incinerate your remains. Since it was done in the privacy of the home, it's all good. This is what you condemn millions to, just so you can have casual sex.

 

[Red1966]

Pretty sure that's not what Obama supports Why do you think it should be OK to give the government the power to tell people what to do in one instance (abortion), but not anything else, like drugs (I would hope)? Why is it OK to impose what you believe to be the moral position that not every other equal American might not also believe? Isn't the traditionally conservative position to be limited government?

So killing should not be recognized by the law? Just because some people find nothing wrong with rape, robbery, and murder, we have no justification for outlawing it? You want limited government when it comes to regulating your actions, yet demand government regulation for others. You are such a hypocrite.

 

[Red1966]

Pretty sure that's not what Obama supports Why do you think it should be OK to give the government the power to tell people what to do in one instance (abortion), but not anything else, like drugs (I would hope)? Why is it OK to impose what you believe to be the moral position that not every other equal American might not also believe? Isn't the traditionally conservative position to be limited government?

Obama voted multiple times time against laws outlawing partial birth abortions.

 

[Red1966]

Can you provide a source that says Obama supports 3rd trimester abortions? Who gets to decide what age a fetus becomes a human? And using what basis? Are you saying you agree with the "majority rule"? Whatever the most Americans believe is true, no matter what it is, should be the law? I am suggesting we limit the laws we have to actually protecting people from other people, not "protecting people from themselves"

Could you be any more unaware of the history of the politician you support?

 

[greentrip]

michele obama is equally as sick as well and in 2004 she wrote a letter that used partial-birth baby killing as a fundraising topic for Barys Senate run, yes she has a foul and disgusting mind as well.

 

[Doer]

USCB radical feminist porn professor whose area of emphasis is black cultural studies, pornography and sex work assaulted a 16 year old girl, violated
her free speech (in a special free speech zone), committed assault, and vandalism. This perhaps should be considered a hate crime as well since she committed the violence because she disagreed with someones religious beliefs.
Is it way past time to cut student loans to institutions that teach such mindless dribble.


[HR][/HR] Education:

PhD. New York University (American History and History of the African Dispora
M.A. New York University (American History and History of the African Dispora)
B.A. Emory University (History)
Dissertation: "A Taste for Brown Sugar: The History of Black Women in American Pornography."
1* professors university web page

[HR][/HR]

http://dailynexus.com/2014-03-13/feminist-studies-professor-enters-confrontation-with-pro-life-protestors/comment-page-1/#comment-257163

Wow!! She wrote the book on my favorite subject!

IAC, she didn't go nuts. Did you even see the incident or the read the pap? She admitted she was preggers. And the sight of aborted fetus set the mom to be in Action.

Noithing happened. Kids these day, won't even fight a couple of girls to keep their sign in the Free Speech zone.

Like my Dad said, when the cops took my, "Down with the War sign."

"Son, anyone can hold a sign. But, can you keep it? HA HAaaaaaa."

 

[Padawanbater2]

Multi-quote function, buddy, it's your friend, use it..

0 are acceptable. Abortions were never made legal. The laws banning them were declared "unconstitutional". Those woman are already criminals. We call them "murderers".

Well, calling a woman who gets an abortion a "murderer" is the same as calling a potato a grapefruit - you can call something whatever you want, it doesn't mean that's what it is..

"The laws banning abortion were declared unconstitutional" - that would make them legal

Are you implying you can do anything if you hide it?

You can't tell the difference between an adult human being and a group of cells/fetus? Really? That's interesting..

So killing should not be recognized by the law?

Abortions are not "killing", you are ignorant of how abortions work and what they are, so, like usual, you're afraid of them

Obama voted multiple times time against laws outlawing partial birth abortions.

"I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported – which was to say – that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born – even if it was as a consequence of an induced abortion. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade." -Obama

Could you be any more unaware of the history of the politician you support?

I don't support Obama, you are confused again

 

[greentrip]

Wow!! She wrote the book on my favorite subject!- not surprising

IAC, she didn't go nuts. Did you even see the incident or the read the pap?"

I saw the video just like the cops that's why she was charged like she should of been

On March 3, a USCB Santa Barbara professor attacked a young pro-life activist, stole and destroyed her sign, and encouraged a group of students to violence, trying to incite a mob

 

[greentrip]

partial birth abortions.

"I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported – which was to say – that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born – even if it was as a consequence of an induced abortion. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade." -Obama

Complete bullshit the bill was rewritten eliminating any marginally worrisome language
he voted against it both times -typical Obama lie

 

[Dr.J20]

Let me guess. You are up to your eyeballs in student loan debt taken out to pay for a degree in mid evil French Literature, or maybe drama, and nobody will hire you. You can only discharge your student loan debts except by repaying them, so you are kinda screwed. In the grown up world a marketable skill is worth while.

A long time ago I worked for Hughes Aircraft. One of the guys on the technical staff with a degree in Computer Science was bitter because his CS degree was his second pass through college. His first degree was a BA in French. He got tired of being unemployed so he went back and got a BS CS. He was quite indignant that nobody offered to hire him with his French degree. Liberal arts degrees are meant for dilettantes. For those of us who have to earn a living, literature classes are a luxury, and why anybody would study "feminist studies" is beyond me.

It strikes me as very bad form for a college professor to assault a teenager and to violate her civil rights. I guess I am just old fashioned that way.

I'm very sorry I decided to look back into this thread. But it is completely unsurprising that you wouldn't understand why anybody might study feminism (that's the correct way to write what you meant there). I haven't paid a cent for my education because I have been fully funded, for which I am extraordinarily thankful. I did work very hard to win the academic awards I have earned. So, no, I am not up to my eyeballs in debt.

You are still equating education with job training. You are of the opinion that the dark ages were better than the Renaissance. I don't think there should be massive populations of people involved in knowledge production. To produce knowlege--the genuine purpose of the academy--requires a much more developed mind, along with a value structure that does not place material objects so highly above all else in the value hierarchy, than is commonly found in the average member of the population. But i do think it is important to set aside the brightest minds and allow them to just think about existence, reality, the world.

Just because you don't understand WHY or WHAT THE VALUE of studying something is, doesn't mean it isn't valuable. And there are more value systems than the monetary system.

 

[Dr.J20]

Let me guess. You are up to your eyeballs in student loan debt taken out to pay for a degree in mid evil French Literature, or maybe drama, and nobody will hire you. You can only discharge your student loan debts except by repaying them, so you are kinda screwed. In the grown up world a marketable skill is worth while.

A long time ago I worked for Hughes Aircraft. One of the guys on the technical staff with a degree in Computer Science was bitter because his CS degree was his second pass through college. His first degree was a BA in French. He got tired of being unemployed so he went back and got a BS CS. He was quite indignant that nobody offered to hire him with his French degree. Liberal arts degrees are meant for dilettantes. For those of us who have to earn a living, literature classes are a luxury, and why anybody would study "feminist studies" is beyond me.

It strikes me as very bad form for a college professor to assault a teenager and to violate her civil rights. I guess I am just old fashioned that way.

And, furthermore, to insinuate that I am not in the adult world because I'm pursing a doctorate, and that persons involved in the academy have no marketable skills really does display just how provincial (read: pea brained) you are.