Denial of a service ? Were you the kid in the neighborhood that never got invited to birthday parties lil Bucky? I bet you were. You may have felt bad, but you see the other kids could decide who they wanted at their birthday party, that was their right. If they crashed YOUR birthday party without an invite that would be wrong.
you're comparing the denial of service that blacks endured in the pre-civil rights south to not being invited to a child's birthday party?
there's that trademark lack of perspective that you are so infamous for.
People are harmed when there is an act against them
like the act of being denied access to the same set of services and goods based on the color of their skin?
Who is denied the use of your stuff or why does not change the fact that "your stuff" is your stuff.
we're not talking about the impressive collection of lysander spooner worship material scattered about your messy room, we're talking about businesses that are 'open to the public'.
when you advertise "your stuff" as being "available to the public" and then deny anyone who is publicly black (or gay, GO ARIZONA! amirite?), that's a different story.
for the philosopher you claim to be, you sure do suck at making distinctions, especially such simple ones.
the easiest solution to racism is to put the racist business owner out of business by going elsewhere.
you know that didn't work, right?
not only do you lack perspective entirely and are unable to make simple distinctions, but you are an unrepentant historical revisionist.
blacks were mocked and tormented by whites during the sit-ins. in some places of the south and out in tennessee, they were violently confronted and beaten.
you can attempt to revise history, you can turn a blind eye to important distinctions, you can keep your lack of perspective, and you can refuse to answer a simple straightforward question from me about whther or not the racist practices of the pre-civil rights south caused harm, but it only makes you appear even stupider than we all already know you are.
