USCB Radical feminist porn professor goes nuts

desert dude said:
Asking a woman if she approves of abortion, and then stating that you think abortion is murder is not calling a woman a murderer. As I pointed out in a previous post, more women than men disapprove of abortion, hence you are more likely than not of meeting a woman who disapproves of abortion than one who approves.
Click to expand...

If she approves of abortion, she would be a murderer according to CS. If a woman made it clear she believes I'm a murderer on a first date, I can guarantee there wouldn't be a second one, I'm sure most people would agree with that

Shouldn't it be "more women disapprove of abortions than approve of them"?
 
We have already seen that Desert dude is not only judgmental but must be a huge hit with the ladies.

You could just imagine how that date would turn out.

DD: Hi nice to meet you, do you believe in abortion

Date: Um WHAT!!!!!

DD: hey where are you going? come back..
 
UncleBuck said:
those good old libertarian "ethics" of prohibiting liberty.

at least he doesn;t join white supremacy groups and wish prison on people for their political views, like you do.
Click to expand...

I'm not prohibiting anyone. My soulmate's ethics have to be mine. Tell me who I'm doing this to? Don't even vote. You forgot to take a course in logic before you dropped out.
 
According to gallop pro choice is a minority and more Americans are pro life.
ESPECIALLY woman!

We also no that a HUGE majority support
lowering the time to under 20 weeks.
 
greentrip said:
According to gallop pro choice is a minority and more Americans are pro life.
ESPECIALLY woman!

We also no that a HUGE majority support
lowering the time to under 20 weeks.
Click to expand...

apparently you don't understand that rights are not subject to a vote.

if you did understand that simple concept, you wouldn't have wasted your time making the post you just did.

see ya later, toolwoman.

3027826d1395259500-uscb-radical-feminist-porn-professor-screenshot-2014-03-19-12.40.15
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2014-03-19 at 12.40.15 PM.jpg
    Screenshot 2014-03-19 at 12.40.15 PM.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 31
UncleBuck said:
apparently you don't understand that rights are not subject to a vote.

if you did understand that simple concept, you wouldn't have wasted your time making the post you just did.

see ya later, toolwoman.

3027826d1395259500-uscb-radical-feminist-porn-professor-screenshot-2014-03-19-12.40.15
Click to expand...

Abortion was illegal before, it will happen again once we're an enlightened society and eliminate our base desires from controlling our decisions.
 
Canna Sylvan said:
Abortion was illegal before, it will happen again once we're an enlightened society and eliminate our base desires from controlling our decisions.
Click to expand...

do you think women are just gonna stop having abortions if they're prohibited, my prohibitionist friend?

and to get it prohibited again, you'll have to find a republican candidate to make SCOTUS picks who can actually win a general election with an increasingly diverse electorate, which means you're basically hopeless and fucked on that front.

first things first, prohibitionist.
 
UncleBuck said:
do you think women are just gonna stop having abortions if they're prohibited, my prohibitionist friend?

and to get it prohibited again, you'll have to find a republican candidate to make SCOTUS picks who can actually win a general election with an increasingly diverse electorate, which means you're basically hopeless and fucked on that front.

first things first, prohibitionist.
Click to expand...

Political parties aren't part of an enlightened society. You do realize they were created for war?
 
UncleBuck said:
do you think women are just gonna stop having abortions if they're prohibited, my prohibitionist friend?

and to get it prohibited again, you'll have to find a republican candidate to make SCOTUS picks who can actually win a general election with an increasingly diverse electorate, which means you're basically hopeless and fucked on that front.

first things first, prohibitionist.
Click to expand...

speaking of elections..rend pawl made a comment..about not being "repentant" enough..doesn't he understand it is such a turnoff for those of us who don't share his belief in religion, to use biblical type words or phrases?
 
UncleBuck said:
is that where i get to cause harm to others?
Click to expand...

No. It's where all peaceful people get to use their body and their justly acquired property as they see fit as long as they don't deprive others of the use of their body or their property.

Thanks for asking though. By the way what size are those shoes? They're enormous. Why do you have a bulbous red nose?
 
Rob Roy said:
No. It's where all peaceful people get to use their body and their justly acquired property as they see fit as long as they don't deprive others of the use of their body or their property.

Thanks for asking though. By the way what size are those shoes? They're enormous. Why do you have a bulbous red nose?
Click to expand...

Rob Roy, how do you feel about a guaranteed basic income? Does it get you hot or hotter?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top