Mass Murder by Blade, you Vast Idiots

Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
You can't prove a negative, why are you asking for proof? Only someone with no common sense would do that.
Click to expand...
The person making the claim holds the burden of proof not the other way around.

NoDrama said:
I highly doubt that, unless you think repealing one amendment and adding another is easy to do.
Click to expand...
Could there not be an amendment created that defines 'keep' in the 2nd?

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Are you the person who vets the source as credible?
Click to expand...
That's the game and why I won't play it. 'All the shit is shit except their shit, which is the good shit.' George Carlin. (paraphrase)
Since we are in a Federation of States the records are State by State and they have been compiled by all sorts of jurisdictions, including the FBI. And so, the snotties, who think their stats are gold, and will crow about the limitations of fact collecting for all but their purposes.

And they sit and taunt like that is reasonable. But, when I provide the stats, these little boot lickers want to wave pecker and pee all over the messenger, to stink up the message. So, the snotties can find out, if they care, but they don't. So, nothing I can do about their immaturity, is there?

I won't play into Saganism. Master Buck taught me that one.

Thanks Buck.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Beefbisquit said:
Could there not be an amendment created that defines 'keep' in the 2nd?

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Click to expand...
Repealing the second might be possible, but repealing the ex-post facto law will not. I can't imagine what atrocities would be bandied about as possible if that were to expire.

As far as redefining "keep" that's going to be a hard sell. You will force people to BEAR them instead will you not?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Repealing the second might be possible, but repealing the ex-post facto law will not. I can't imagine what atrocities would be bandied about as possible if that were to expire.

As far as redefining "keep" that's going to be a hard sell. You will force people to BEAR them instead will you not?
Click to expand...

Burden of Proof!!! Ha Haaa. He watches too much TV and thinks we can prove anything to bird brains.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Beefbisquit said:
The person making the claim holds the burden of proof not the other way around.



Could there not be an amendment created that defines 'keep' in the 2nd?

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Click to expand...
Sure Amend away, you dolt.
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Burden of Proof!!! Ha Haaa. He watches too much TV and thinks we can prove anything to bird brains.
Click to expand...
No, I understand how a logical argument is supposed to be constructed. The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim, not on the one rejecting it.

"Take a look, it's in a book..."

[video=youtube_share;a0sU1aG7kBM]http://youtu.be/a0sU1aG7kBM[/video]

You're being an insufferable twat. You think just because you say something, it makes it true? No dice.

You have no credible source for your statements, that's why you won't share your sources. Too scared.

You're a joke.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Beefbisquit said:
No, I understand how a logical argument is supposed to be constructed. The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim, not on the one rejecting it.

"Take a look, it's in a book..."

[video=youtube_share;a0sU1aG7kBM]http://youtu.be/a0sU1aG7kBM[/video]

You're being an insufferable twat. You think just because you say something, it makes it true? No dice.

You have no credible source for your statements, that's why you won't share your sources. Too scared.

You're a joke.
Click to expand...
No...understand that, burden of proof is a legal concept. And it takes authority.

Authority takes force. Not words, boo boo. Force.

And I'm fine with your joke, berry berry punnny to me
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
guns save 7 billion lives per year.
Click to expand...
Confronting the mortality of the world around us (as well as our own mortality) can lead us to reflect more earnestly about our priorities - and provide us with a sense of urgency of purpose.
Statisticians have calculated the "mortality rate" for the world to be roughly .883 percent. This means that 1 out of every 113 people in the world died last year.

Based on this rate, here is an estimate of the incidence of death among people now living in the world:

  • 1.78 deaths per second
  • 107 deaths per minute
  • 6,390 deaths per hour
  • 153,000 deaths per day
  • 56.0 million deaths per year
  • 3.9 billion deaths per average lifetime (70 years)
 
Beefbisquit

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
http://www.hebrew4christians.com/About_HFC/Death_Rate/death_rate.html

Confronting the mortality of the world around us (as well as our own mortality) can lead us to reflect more earnestly about our priorities - and provide us with a sense of urgency of purpose.
Statisticians have calculated the "mortality rate" for the world to be roughly .883 percent. This means that 1 out of every 113 people in the world died last year.

Based on this rate, here is an estimate of the incidence of death among people now living in the world:

  • 1.78 deaths per second
  • 107 deaths per minute
  • 6,390 deaths per hour
  • 153,000 deaths per day
  • 56.0 million deaths per year
  • 3.9 billion deaths per average lifetime (70 years)
Of course, these numbers are based on inductive generalization and therefore are not infallible; however, the fact remains that people are dying all around us - and many of these people have not heard of the salvation of the LORD God of Israel through Yeshua His Son.

May these sobering thoughts spur us on to action! May they shock us out of our apathy and move our heart's affections to freely share the gospel of our LORD Jesus the Messiah to a dying and hurting world.

"O blessed Holy One of Israel, give us all a heart for the lost children of this world! Give us joyful courage to reach out to them all. Help us, LORD, to be your witnesses in the truth. In the Name of Yeshua our LORD I ask: Amen."


Is this supposed to be an example of an unreliable source? No citations, no reference to who, when, where any of these statistics have been calculated.
 
thecannacove

thecannacove

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
No...understand that, burden of proof is a legal concept. And it takes authority.

Authority takes force. Not words, boo boo. Force.

And I'm fine with your joke, berry berry punnny to me
Click to expand...
I've finally come to the conclusion you are mentally unstable. My apologies for my perhaps overzealous joking and "taunts", I don't want to wind up seeing you jump from a bridge or something someday and think it was because of me.. bless you. May you find good health again someday.
 
thecannacove

thecannacove

Well-Known Member
Beefbisquit said:
http://www.hebrew4christians.com/About_HFC/Death_Rate/death_rate.html

Confronting the mortality of the world around us (as well as our own mortality) can lead us to reflect more earnestly about our priorities - and provide us with a sense of urgency of purpose.
Statisticians have calculated the "mortality rate" for the world to be roughly .883 percent. This means that 1 out of every 113 people in the world died last year.

Based on this rate, here is an estimate of the incidence of death among people now living in the world:

  • 1.78 deaths per second
  • 107 deaths per minute
  • 6,390 deaths per hour
  • 153,000 deaths per day
  • 56.0 million deaths per year
  • 3.9 billion deaths per average lifetime (70 years)
Of course, these numbers are based on inductive generalization and therefore are not infallible; however, the fact remains that people are dying all around us - and many of these people have not heard of the salvation of the LORD God of Israel through Yeshua His Son.

May these sobering thoughts spur us on to action! May they shock us out of our apathy and move our heart's affections to freely share the gospel of our LORD Jesus the Messiah to a dying and hurting world.

"O blessed Holy One of Israel, give us all a heart for the lost children of this world! Give us joyful courage to reach out to them all. Help us, LORD, to be your witnesses in the truth. In the Name of Yeshua our LORD I ask: Amen."


Is this supposed to be an example of an unreliable source? No citations, no reference to who, when, where any of these statistics have been calculated.
Click to expand...
Lmao - oh my.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
thecannacove said:
I've finally come to the conclusion you are mentally unstable. My apologies for my perhaps overzealous joking and "taunts", I don't want to wind up seeing you jump from a bridge or something someday and think it was because of me.. bless you. May you find good health again someday.
Click to expand...
There you go, Doctor Horse Ass, have a nice day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top