you don't see the conflict of interest here?
did you miss the part where his new gig is working for nuclear energy and deforestation companies?
Where are you getting your numbers from, are you really claiming that only 3% of scientists world wide disagree with AGW?
that's the approximate number that study after study after study shows and you've never been able to provide the least bit of evidence to the contrary.
The low is just under 4%, the high is 6%. So yes, you can search for the studies yourself in a journal database. Climate Change is about as accepted as evolution since it's effects can be proven, contrary to what the business propaganda machine would try and have you believe. But you seem like the type who's already bought into the business community's propaganda.
So where are your sources for that claim?
If you're interested, pull up an academic database and search for the keywords. I'm not here to spend my time doing more work to prove to you that you're a moron. If you care about being right, as opposed to fueling your ego, then you'll figure it out for yourself. You have the same resources I do.
Just to jump start your recovery, and to refresh my memory, here you go. This is your one freebie.
teh fux is a "deforestation company" ?
pulp and paper companies that clear cut rain forests and other such places.
"We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming."
Bitch slap rep incoming.
belay that bitch slap. the citation is worthless.