well thanks for your input guys i guess it's gonna be the hans panels then. cause heat is an issue. I was thinkin a51 and some suplemental lighting but if i'm gonna do multiple lights i'm just gonna go with the hans. i'm gonna be doin a scrog so i think i'll be able to keep em down under 30". I was pretty set on that apache but after reading your input i guess it aint gonna cut it so...hans it is
if i can afford it. Cause $850 is gonna be pretty close to breaking the budget. Hmmm...gonna have to pinch pennies throughout the rest of the setup :/
The XGS and AT200 are damn near identical on paper, biggest difference I see is HOW they deliver their light (not the product itself, the light...)
From what I understand the AT120 was suggested at 2.5x3' by the Company, and the same for the AT200, but I am trying to stretch it to be another single-point 3x3' area.
I do think all four of these panels are just about as interchangeable as you can get between companies... (is it JUST ironic that they love AW and 3:2, no way jose...
) I do not personally own a 120, but my friend Grene may take a reading under one of his 3:2's for a better idea of the sgs vs. 120 thing.
If I could point something out- when you are suggesting coverage, Grenegenes, do you consider yourself talking about the well-saturated coverage of the 120 as 2x2', or is that it?
Just trying to picture it, Im sure seeing an AT120 "saturate" a 2x2' area, compared to a SS200 "saturating" a 2x2' are two completely different experiences...
Top gun- To get an idea of the AT200 in a 3x3' drop in on my Signature, been busy lately but in the first couple pages there are "bare" shots with just the Light/Tent/Screens than you can get an idea of things... personally I would steer towards x2 SGS', but I love WR soooo...
be safe everyone!
btw, get the fucking like button back.